Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add dependence arc from running rustc to its libraries. #7820

Conversation

pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

r? anyone

Fix #8057

This commit fixes some oversights in the Makefile where rustc could be
invoked without some of its dependencies yet in place. (I encountered
the problem in practice; its not just theoretical.)

As written in Makefile.in, $(STAGE$(1)T$(2)H$(3)) is the way one
writes an invocation of rustc where $(1) is the stage number $(2) is
the target triple $(3) is the host triple. (Other uses of the macro
may plug in actual values or different parameters in for those three
formal parameters.)

When you have invocations of $(STAGE...), you need to make sure that
its dependences are satisfied; otherwise, if someone is using make -jN for certain (large-ish) N, one can encounter situations where
GNU make attempts to invoke rustc before it has actually copied some
of its libraries into place, such as libmorestack.a, which causes a
link failure when the rustc invocation attempts to link in those
libraries.

In this case, the main prerequisite to add is TSREQ$(1)T$(2)H$(3),
which is described in Makefile.in as "Prerequisites for using the
stageN compiler to build target artifacts"


In addition to adding the extra dependences on TSREQ..., I also
replaced occurrences of the pattern:

TSREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3)
$$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_STDLIB_$(2))
$$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_EXTRALIB_$(2))

with:

SREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3)

which is equivalent to the above, as defined in Makefile.in


Finally, for the cases where TSREQ was missing in tests.mk, I went
ahead and put in a dependence on SREQ rather than just TSREQ, since it
was not clear to me how one could expect to compile those cases
without stdlib and extralib.

(It could well be that I should have gone ahead and done the same in
other cases where I saw TSREQ was missing, and put SREQ in those
cases as well. But this seemed like a good measure for now, without
needing to tax my understanding of the overall makefile
infrastructure much further.)

This commit fixes some oversights in the Makefile where rustc could be
invoked without some of its dependencies yet in place.  (I encountered
the problem in practice; its not just theoretical.)

As written in Makefile.in, $(STAGE$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3)) is the way one
writes an invocation of rustc where $(1) is the stage number $(2) is
the target triple $(3) is the host triple.  (Other uses of the macro
may plug in actual values or different parameters in for those three
formal parameters.)

When you have invocations of $(STAGE...), you need to make sure that
its dependences are satisfied; otherwise, if someone is using `make
-jN` for certain (large-ish) `N`, one can encounter situations where
GNU make attempts to invoke `rustc` before it has actually copied some
of its libraries into place, such as libmorestack.a, which causes a
link failure when the rustc invocation attempts to link in those
libraries.

In this case, the main prerequisite to add is TSREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3),
which is described in Makefile.in as "Prerequisites for using the
stageN compiler to build target artifacts"

----

In addition to adding the extra dependences on TSREQ..., I also
replaced occurrences of the pattern:

    TSREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3)
    $$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_STDLIB_$(2))
    $$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_EXTRALIB_$(2))

with:

    SREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3)

which is equivalent to the above, as defined in Makefile.in

----

Finally, for the cases where TSREQ was missing in tests.mk, I went
ahead and put in a dependence on SREQ rather than just TSREQ, since it
was not clear to me how one could expect to compile those cases
without stdlib and extralib.

(It could well be that I should have gone ahead and done the same in
 other cases where I saw TSREQ was missing, and put SREQ in those
 cases as well.  But this seemed like a good measure for now, without
 needing to tax my understanding of the overall makefile
 infrastructure much further.)
@emberian
Copy link
Member

I've actually run into this too, on my bench server (which uses -j4) some builds randomly fail. I just solved it by running make twice, nice to have a real fix!

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member Author

@cmr can I interpret your comment as an r+ then? :)

@emberian
Copy link
Member

@pnkfelix I considered r+'ing it, but I have no knowledge of the makefiles/buildsystem. Maybe @graydon could review it?

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member Author

formally filed as #8057

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2013
…pendences, r=graydon

r? anyone

Fix #8057

This commit fixes some oversights in the Makefile where rustc could be
invoked without some of its dependencies yet in place.  (I encountered
the problem in practice; its not just theoretical.)

As written in Makefile.in, $(STAGE$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3)) is the way one
writes an invocation of rustc where $(1) is the stage number $(2) is
the target triple $(3) is the host triple.  (Other uses of the macro
may plug in actual values or different parameters in for those three
formal parameters.)

When you have invocations of $(STAGE...), you need to make sure that
its dependences are satisfied; otherwise, if someone is using `make
-jN` for certain (large-ish) `N`, one can encounter situations where
GNU make attempts to invoke `rustc` before it has actually copied some
of its libraries into place, such as libmorestack.a, which causes a
link failure when the rustc invocation attempts to link in those
libraries.

In this case, the main prerequisite to add is TSREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3),
which is described in Makefile.in as "Prerequisites for using the
stageN compiler to build target artifacts"

----

In addition to adding the extra dependences on TSREQ..., I also
replaced occurrences of the pattern:

    TSREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3)
    $$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_STDLIB_$(2))
    $$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_EXTRALIB_$(2))

with:

    SREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3)

which is equivalent to the above, as defined in Makefile.in

----

Finally, for the cases where TSREQ was missing in tests.mk, I went
ahead and put in a dependence on SREQ rather than just TSREQ, since it
was not clear to me how one could expect to compile those cases
without stdlib and extralib.

(It could well be that I should have gone ahead and done the same in
 other cases where I saw TSREQ was missing, and put SREQ in those
 cases as well.  But this seemed like a good measure for now, without
 needing to tax my understanding of the overall makefile
 infrastructure much further.)
@bors bors closed this Jul 26, 2013
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2021
Fix `manual_map` with unsafe functions

fixes: rust-lang#7820
changelog: Fix `manual_map` suggestion when used with unsafe functions and unsafe blocks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

make: rustc invocations need to depend on the rustc libraries
4 participants