-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unsized rvalues: implement boxed closure impls. (2nd try) #59500
Conversation
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
I don't know if i have this permission: |
@crlf0710: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: not in try users |
r? @cramertj |
r? @rust-lang/compiler I'll start the try build for you. @bors try |
⌛ Trying commit 3701ed0a3e5f68535ef49c80e1bfeb1175229d46 with merge 1867821893967fb2b71b2b79ac370fddf4de3b96... |
r? @cramertj |
☀️ Try build successful - checks-travis |
It seems bors try doesn't cover gnux32 arch? How can i run a test build that covers one? |
I'm not sure if there's a way to do that-- maybe @alexcrichton or someone on @rust-lang/infra knows? |
You could edit |
OK, temporarily enabled |
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
:( it seems the bug is still there. I'll try to seek for some help or some hint for investigation, but i don't think this will be in time for 1.35. |
Blocked on #59674 |
Also ping @pnkfelix for additional help. |
It seems there's a nll-compare-mode on this specific runner (x86_64-gnu-nopt). Let me see if i can update the expected output for this mode. |
Seems the test can pass now: https://travis-ci.com/rust-lang/rust/builds/107171751 |
30af9d6
to
812d89c
Compare
@cramertj Could you review the new changes and approve it again if there's no problem? Sorry for the inconvenience! |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 812d89c has been approved by |
…mertj Unsized rvalues: implement boxed closure impls. (2nd try) This is a rebase of S-blocked-closed PR rust-lang#55431 to current master. LLVM has moved forward since then, so maybe we can check whether the new LLVM 8.0 version unblocked this work.
Unsized rvalues: implement boxed closure impls. (2nd try) This is a rebase of S-blocked-closed PR #55431 to current master. LLVM has moved forward since then, so maybe we can check whether the new LLVM 8.0 version unblocked this work.
☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor |
Version 1.35.0 (2019-05-23) ========================== Language -------- - [`FnOnce`, `FnMut`, and the `Fn` traits are now implemented for `Box<FnOnce>`, `Box<FnMut>`, and `Box<Fn>` respectively.][59500] - [You can now coerce closures into unsafe function pointers.][59580] e.g. ```rust unsafe fn call_unsafe(func: unsafe fn()) { func() } pub fn main() { unsafe { call_unsafe(|| {}); } } ``` Compiler -------- - [Added the `armv6-unknown-freebsd-gnueabihf` and `armv7-unknown-freebsd-gnueabihf` targets.][58080] - [Added the `wasm32-unknown-wasi` target.][59464] Libraries --------- - [`Thread` will now show its ID in `Debug` output.][59460] - [`StdinLock`, `StdoutLock`, and `StderrLock` now implement `AsRawFd`.][59512] - [`alloc::System` now implements `Default`.][59451] - [Expanded `Debug` output (`{:#?}`) for structs now has a trailing comma on the last field.][59076] - [`char::{ToLowercase, ToUppercase}` now implement `ExactSizeIterator`.][58778] - [All `NonZero` numeric types now implement `FromStr`.][58717] - [Removed the `Read` trait bounds on the `BufReader::{get_ref, get_mut, into_inner}` methods.][58423] - [You can now call the `dbg!` macro without any parameters to print the file and line where it is called.][57847] - [In place ASCII case conversions are now up to 4× faster.][59283] e.g. `str::make_ascii_lowercase` - [`hash_map::{OccupiedEntry, VacantEntry}` now implement `Sync` and `Send`.][58369] Stabilized APIs --------------- - [`f32::copysign`] - [`f64::copysign`] - [`RefCell::replace_with`] - [`RefCell::map_split`] - [`ptr::hash`] - [`Range::contains`] - [`RangeFrom::contains`] - [`RangeTo::contains`] - [`RangeInclusive::contains`] - [`RangeToInclusive::contains`] - [`Option::copied`] Cargo ----- - [You can now set `cargo:rustc-cdylib-link-arg` at build time to pass custom linker arguments when building a `cdylib`.][cargo/6298] Its usage is highly platform specific. Misc ---- - [The Rust toolchain is now available natively for musl based distros.][58575] [59460]: rust-lang/rust#59460 [59464]: rust-lang/rust#59464 [59500]: rust-lang/rust#59500 [59512]: rust-lang/rust#59512 [59580]: rust-lang/rust#59580 [59283]: rust-lang/rust#59283 [59451]: rust-lang/rust#59451 [59076]: rust-lang/rust#59076 [58778]: rust-lang/rust#58778 [58717]: rust-lang/rust#58717 [58369]: rust-lang/rust#58369 [58423]: rust-lang/rust#58423 [58080]: rust-lang/rust#58080 [57847]: rust-lang/rust#57847 [58575]: rust-lang/rust#58575 [cargo/6298]: rust-lang/cargo#6298 [`f32::copysign`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.f32.html#method.copysign [`f64::copysign`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.f64.html#method.copysign [`RefCell::replace_with`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/cell/struct.RefCell.html#method.replace_with [`RefCell::map_split`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/cell/struct.RefCell.html#method.map_split [`ptr::hash`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/ptr/fn.hash.html [`Range::contains`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ops/struct.Range.html#method.contains [`RangeFrom::contains`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ops/struct.RangeFrom.html#method.contains [`RangeTo::contains`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ops/struct.RangeTo.html#method.contains [`RangeInclusive::contains`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ops/struct.RangeInclusive.html#method.contains [`RangeToInclusive::contains`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ops/struct.RangeToInclusive.html#method.contains [`Option::copied`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/option/enum.Option.html#method.copied
This is a rebase of S-blocked-closed PR #55431 to current master. LLVM has moved forward since then, so maybe we can check whether the new LLVM 8.0 version unblocked this work.