rustc_resolve: get rid of unused rustdoc::span_of_fragments_with_expansion #144334
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…nsion This function can cause false negatives if used incorrectly (usually "do any of the doc fragments come from a macro" is the wrong question to ask), and thus it is unused.
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
GuillaumeGomez
approved these changes
Jul 23, 2025
|
I love when code gets removed, thanks! @bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
fmease
added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 23, 2025
…ents-revert, r=GuillaumeGomez rustc_resolve: get rid of unused rustdoc::span_of_fragments_with_expansion This function can cause false negatives if used incorrectly (usually "do any of the doc fragments come from a macro" is the wrong question to ask), and thus it is unused. r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
fmease
added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 23, 2025
…ents-revert, r=GuillaumeGomez rustc_resolve: get rid of unused rustdoc::span_of_fragments_with_expansion This function can cause false negatives if used incorrectly (usually "do any of the doc fragments come from a macro" is the wrong question to ask), and thus it is unused. r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
fmease
added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2025
…ents-revert, r=GuillaumeGomez rustc_resolve: get rid of unused rustdoc::span_of_fragments_with_expansion This function can cause false negatives if used incorrectly (usually "do any of the doc fragments come from a macro" is the wrong question to ask), and thus it is unused. r? ```@GuillaumeGomez```
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2025
Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - #132748 (get rid of some false negatives in rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links) - #143374 (Unquerify extern_mod_stmt_cnum.) - #143838 (std: net: uefi: Add support to query connection data) - #144014 (don't link to the nightly version of the Edition Guide in stable lints) - #144094 (Ensure we codegen the main fn) - #144218 (Use serde for target spec json deserialize) - #144221 (generate elf symbol version in raw-dylib) - #144240 (Add more test case to check if the false note related to sealed trait suppressed) - #144247 (coretests/num: use ldexp instead of hard-coding a power of 2) - #144276 (Use less HIR in check_private_in_public.) - #144317 (pass build.npm from bootstrap to tidy and use it for npm install) - #144320 (rustdoc: avoid allocating a temp String for aliases in search index) - #144334 (rustc_resolve: get rid of unused rustdoc::span_of_fragments_with_expansion) - #144335 (Don't suggest assoc ty bound on non-angle-bracketed problematic assoc ty binding) - #144358 (Stop using the old `validate_attr` logic for stability attributes) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
fmease
added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2025
…ents-revert, r=GuillaumeGomez rustc_resolve: get rid of unused rustdoc::span_of_fragments_with_expansion This function can cause false negatives if used incorrectly (usually "do any of the doc fragments come from a macro" is the wrong question to ask), and thus it is unused. r? ````@GuillaumeGomez````
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2025
Rollup of 16 pull requests Successful merges: - #143374 (Unquerify extern_mod_stmt_cnum.) - #143838 (std: net: uefi: Add support to query connection data) - #144014 (don't link to the nightly version of the Edition Guide in stable lints) - #144094 (Ensure we codegen the main fn) - #144218 (Use serde for target spec json deserialize) - #144221 (generate elf symbol version in raw-dylib) - #144232 (Implement support for `become` and explicit tail call codegen for the LLVM backend) - #144240 (Add more test case to check if the false note related to sealed trait suppressed) - #144247 (coretests/num: use ldexp instead of hard-coding a power of 2) - #144276 (Use less HIR in check_private_in_public.) - #144278 (add Rev::into_inner) - #144317 (pass build.npm from bootstrap to tidy and use it for npm install) - #144320 (rustdoc: avoid allocating a temp String for aliases in search index) - #144334 (rustc_resolve: get rid of unused rustdoc::span_of_fragments_with_expansion) - #144335 (Don't suggest assoc ty bound on non-angle-bracketed problematic assoc ty binding) - #144358 (Stop using the old `validate_attr` logic for stability attributes) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2025
Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - #143374 (Unquerify extern_mod_stmt_cnum.) - #143838 (std: net: uefi: Add support to query connection data) - #144014 (don't link to the nightly version of the Edition Guide in stable lints) - #144094 (Ensure we codegen the main fn) - #144218 (Use serde for target spec json deserialize) - #144221 (generate elf symbol version in raw-dylib) - #144240 (Add more test case to check if the false note related to sealed trait suppressed) - #144247 (coretests/num: use ldexp instead of hard-coding a power of 2) - #144276 (Use less HIR in check_private_in_public.) - #144278 (add Rev::into_inner) - #144317 (pass build.npm from bootstrap to tidy and use it for npm install) - #144320 (rustdoc: avoid allocating a temp String for aliases in search index) - #144334 (rustc_resolve: get rid of unused rustdoc::span_of_fragments_with_expansion) - #144335 (Don't suggest assoc ty bound on non-angle-bracketed problematic assoc ty binding) - #144358 (Stop using the old `validate_attr` logic for stability attributes) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2025
Rollup merge of #144334 - lolbinarycat:rustdoc-span_of_fragments-revert, r=GuillaumeGomez rustc_resolve: get rid of unused rustdoc::span_of_fragments_with_expansion This function can cause false negatives if used incorrectly (usually "do any of the doc fragments come from a macro" is the wrong question to ask), and thus it is unused. r? `````@GuillaumeGomez`````
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This function can cause false negatives if used incorrectly (usually "do any of the doc fragments come from a macro" is the wrong question to ask), and thus it is unused.
r? @GuillaumeGomez