Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[experiment] Try reverting the MSVC workarounds #134150

Draft
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

[experiment] Try reverting the MSVC workarounds #134150

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

@tgross35 tgross35 commented Dec 10, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Get a fresh set of runs with the following workarounds reverted:

try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: x86_64-msvc-ext

r? @ghost

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 10, 2024
@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors try

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2024
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#134150 - tgross35:test-msvc-revert, r=<try>
4d49ddc 
[experiment] Try reverting the MSVC workarounds

Get a fresh set of runs with the following workarounds reverted:

- rust-lang#130151
- rust-lang#130072
- rust-lang#133248

try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: x86_64-msvc-ext
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 10, 2024

⌛ Trying commit d328ccf with merge 4d49ddc...

@tgross35 tgross35 mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2024
Closed
13 tasks
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-msvc-ext failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) 
Updating files:  99% (50176/50682)
Updating files:  99% (50333/50682)
Updating files: 100% (50682/50682)
Updating files: 100% (50682/50682), done.
branch 'try' set up to track 'origin/try'.
Switched to a new branch 'try'
[command]"C:\Program Files\Git\bin\git.exe" log -1 --format=%H
4d49ddc2cc96747903735e7607f78dea19cce7ae
##[group]Run src/ci/scripts/setup-environment.sh
src/ci/scripts/setup-environment.sh
---
file:.git/config remote.origin.url=https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust
file:.git/config remote.origin.fetch=+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
file:.git/config gc.auto=0
file:.git/config http.https://github.com/.extraheader=AUTHORIZATION: basic ***
file:.git/config branch.try.remote=origin
file:.git/config branch.try.merge=refs/heads/try
file:.git/config remote.upstream.fetch=+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/upstream/*
file:.git/config submodule.library/backtrace.active=true
file:.git/config submodule.library/backtrace.url=https://github.com/rust-lang/backtrace-rs.git
file:.git/config submodule.library/stdarch.active=true
---
[RUSTC-TIMING] miri test:false 5.337
error: failed to remove file `C:\a\rust\rust\build\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\stage1-tools\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\release\miri.exe`

Caused by:
  Access is denied. (os error 5)
Command has failed. Rerun with -v to see more details.
  local time: Wed, Dec 11, 2024  1:13:57 AM
  network time: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 01:13:58 GMT
##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
Post job cleanup.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 11, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 11, 2024
@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented Dec 11, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Like clockwork. 😆

@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor Author

Like clockwork 😢 I just tested again since we heard back from GH at actions/runner-images#10483.

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented Dec 11, 2024 •
edited
Loading

@tgross35 btw, im also throwing random things at the problem and hoping something sticks or at least mitigates the failure rate. For example, trying a NTFS dev-drive... #134056

(running into some compiletest bugs features, but yeah)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@tgross35 @bors @rust-log-analyzer @jieyouxu @rustbot