Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use a small runner for msvc-ext2 job #130151

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ChrisDenton
Copy link
Member

Hopefully this should eliminate the errors from this job. The only question is how long it takes.

try-job: x86_64-msvc-ext2

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 9, 2024

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 9, 2024
@ChrisDenton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 9, 2024

⌛ Trying commit ebe4fc4 with merge e828793...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2024
Use a small runner for msvc-ext2 job

Hopefully this should eliminate the errors from this job. The only question is how long it takes.

try-job: x86_64-msvc-ext2
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 9, 2024

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: e828793 (e828793bac2057bddafd66a12563e3eca2da2133)

@ChrisDenton
Copy link
Member Author

2h 25m 34s on that run. That seems roughly in line with the other long running job. I guess it's reviewers choice on if this is ok. According to @ehuss's tests, I think this should eliminate the error on this runner. And since the errors on other runners are now much less frequent, it should be a noticeable improvement to CI success rates.

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

r=me if we still need this

@ChrisDenton
Copy link
Member Author

Looks like this is still needed

@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 15, 2024

📌 Commit ebe4fc4 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 15, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 3 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#130151 (Use a small runner for msvc-ext2 job)
 - rust-lang#130394 (const: don't ICE when encountering a mutable ref to immutable memory)
 - rust-lang#130409 (tests: more ice tests)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 21df3ff into rust-lang:master Sep 16, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.83.0 milestone Sep 16, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#130151 - ChrisDenton:slow-ci, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Use a small runner for msvc-ext2 job

Hopefully this should eliminate the errors from this job. The only question is how long it takes.

try-job: x86_64-msvc-ext2
@ChrisDenton ChrisDenton deleted the slow-ci branch September 16, 2024 11:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants