Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove outdated comments #109406

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2023
Merged

Remove outdated comments #109406

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2023

Conversation

WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member

What the title said

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 20, 2023

r? @cuviper

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 20, 2023
@rustbot

This comment was marked as resolved.

Comment on lines -1 to -3
// This is pretty much entirely stolen from TreeSet, since BTreeMap has an identical interface
// to TreeMap

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was written while we still had TreeSet apparently, not it's just confusing.

Comment on lines -21 to -22
// FIXME(conventions): implement bounded iterators

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this refers range, which was added. Originated in #18605. Similar comment for map was removed since.

Comment on lines -15 to -21
// Future Optimization (FIXME!)
// ============================
//
// Iteration over zero sized values is a noop. There is no need
// for `bucket.val` in the case of HashSet. I suppose we would need HKT
// to get rid of it properly.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was added way before hashbrown. Now this doesn't make any sense.

@cuviper
Copy link
Member

cuviper commented Mar 23, 2023

That all looks fine, thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 23, 2023

📌 Commit c513c3b has been approved by cuviper

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 23, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#109406 (Remove outdated comments)
 - rust-lang#109433 (Return equal for two identical projections)
 - rust-lang#109495 (Implement non-const `Destruct` trait in new solver)
 - rust-lang#109519 (Link against libc++ on AIX)
 - rust-lang#109550 (Make helper functions private in fn_ctxt/adjust_fulfillment_errors)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 936377a into rust-lang:master Mar 24, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Mar 24, 2023
@WaffleLapkin WaffleLapkin deleted the 🥛 branch March 24, 2023 10:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants