Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

InputPin instead of OutputPin for compatibility shim #199

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

AdminXVII
Copy link

The OldInputPin required OutputPin instead of InputPin for the new impl. Fix the trait bound.

The OldInputPin required OutputPin instead of InputPin for the new impl. Fix the trait bound.
@AdminXVII AdminXVII requested review from ilya-epifanov, thejpster and a team as code owners April 7, 2020 00:11
@rust-highfive
Copy link

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @thejpster (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive
Copy link

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

  • Pull requests are usually filed against the master branch for this repo, but this one is against v0.2.x. Please double check that you specified the right target!

Copy link
Contributor

@ryankurte ryankurte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, thanks

bors r+

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2020
199: InputPin instead of OutputPin for compatibility shim r=ryankurte a=AdminXVII

The OldInputPin required OutputPin instead of InputPin for the new impl. Fix the trait bound.

Co-authored-by: Xavier L'Heureux <dev.xlheureux@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan <ryankurte@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@therealprof therealprof left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Apr 7, 2020

Timed out

@ryankurte
Copy link
Contributor

bors retry

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2020
199: InputPin instead of OutputPin for compatibility shim r=ryankurte a=AdminXVII

The OldInputPin required OutputPin instead of InputPin for the new impl. Fix the trait bound.

Co-authored-by: Xavier L'Heureux <dev.xlheureux@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan <ryankurte@users.noreply.github.com>
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Apr 8, 2020

Build failed

@ryankurte
Copy link
Contributor

Failed due to dyn keyword requirement that is / was fixed in 961dfb8, i need to update v0.2.x to the latest non-breaking change (rather than a mirror of 0.2.3)

@ryankurte ryankurte mentioned this pull request Apr 19, 2020
eldruin added a commit to eldruin/embedded-hal that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2020
eldruin added a commit to eldruin/embedded-hal that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2020
bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2020
220: [0.2.x] Fixes to digital compatibility shim r=ryankurte a=eldruin

I cherry-picked #138 and some improvements to docs and included #199.

Co-authored-by: Roma Sokolov <sokolov.r.v@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Kurte <ryankurte@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Diego Barrios Romero <eldruin@gmail.com>
@ryankurte
Copy link
Contributor

cherry-picked into #220, thanks @AdminXVII!

@ryankurte ryankurte closed this Jun 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Review is incomplete T-hal
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants