Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add HumanWrenchWrapper and HumanWrenchRemapper #362

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 9, 2023

Conversation

lrapetti
Copy link
Member

@lrapetti lrapetti commented Sep 28, 2023

This PR adds the new devices as mentioned in #361.

In a4aebad I have also modified the HumanStateVisualizer in order to exploit this novel devices. ⚠️ this means that old applications where the wrench data were streamed on analog port will no longer be compatibile with the visualizer. In order to avoid this issue, it is requested to replace the analogServer device with the HumanWrenchWrapper device as done in https://github.com/robotology/human-dynamics-estimation/compare/add-humanwrench-wrapper-remapper?expand=1#diff-90882fd47b6c2e86b383770e476062185beb69ba0b5dceacdfb8b8280b384819L185-L194. For this reason a release will follow this PR.

@lrapetti lrapetti self-assigned this Sep 28, 2023
@traversaro
Copy link
Member

Probably we can start using nws and nwc from this new devices? Or at least avoid remapper for something that is clearly not a remapper?

@lrapetti
Copy link
Member Author

Probably we can start using nws and nwc from this new devices? Or at least avoid remapper for something that is clearly not a remapper?

I was considering it, but at this point I would prefer changing all of them together. Still if we don't have a better name, I can do that.

@lrapetti
Copy link
Member Author

lrapetti commented Oct 9, 2023

Thanks @traversaro, in the meantime #359 is starting so we will update the name soon.

@lrapetti lrapetti merged commit f6e5f94 into master Oct 9, 2023
@lrapetti lrapetti deleted the add-humanwrench-wrapper-remapper branch October 9, 2023 15:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants