Agree on simultaneous executable graph submission wording #9
Assignees
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Graph Specification
Extension Specification related
Spec Revision 2
Targetting the second revision of the specification
Comments
|
For revision 1 of the spec, we have decided to ban this behaviour intel#5626 (comment) |
EwanC
added
the
Spec Revision 2
Bensuo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 7, 2023
This reverts commit 0e63f1a. clang-format started to crash with contents like: a.h: ``` ``` $ clang-format a.h ``` PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: ../llvm/build/bin/clang-format a.h #0 0x0000560b689fe177 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:723:13 #1 0x0000560b689fbfbe llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:106:18 #2 0x0000560b689feaca SignalHandler(int) /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:413:1 #3 0x00007f030405a540 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x3c540) #4 0x0000560b68a9a980 is /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/include/clang/Lex/Token.h:98:44 #5 0x0000560b68a9a980 is /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/FormatToken.h:562:51 #6 0x0000560b68a9a980 startsSequenceInternal<clang::tok::TokenKind, clang::tok::TokenKind> /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/FormatToken.h:831:9 #7 0x0000560b68a9a980 startsSequence<clang::tok::TokenKind, clang::tok::TokenKind> /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/FormatToken.h:600:12 #8 0x0000560b68a9a980 getFunctionName /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp:3131:17 #9 0x0000560b68a9a980 clang::format::TokenAnnotator::annotate(clang::format::AnnotatedLine&) /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp:3191:17 Segmentation fault ```
mfrancepillois
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 27, 2023
Recent changes to add _BitInt support have caused our internal random testing to fail. This change just avoids a readability magic numbers check for now if a _BitInt. The crash seen (edited for clarity) is shown below. <src-root>/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:1488: uint64_t llvm::APInt::getZExtValue() const: Assertion `getActiveBits() <= 64 && "Too many bits for uint64_t"' failed. ... #9 <address> llvm::APInt::getZExtValue() const <src-root>/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:1488:5 clang::IntegerLiteral const*) const <src-root>/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/MagicNumbersCheck.cpp:198:47 <clang::IntegerLiteral>(clang::ast_matchers::MatchFinder::MatchResult const&, char const*) <src-root>/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/MagicNumbersCheck.h:67:5 clang::ast_matchers::MatchFinder::MatchResult const&) <src-root>/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/MagicNumbersCheck.cpp:152:35 ... Reviewed By: donat.nagy
mfrancepillois
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 27, 2023
evalIntegralCast was using makeIntVal, and when _BitInt() types were introduced this exposed a crash in evalIntegralCast as a result. Improve evalIntegralCast to use makeIntVal more efficiently to avoid the crash exposed by use of _BitInt. This was caught with our internal randomized testing. <src-root>/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:1510: int64_t llvm::APInt::getSExtValue() const: Assertion `getSignificantBits() <= 64 && "Too many bits for int64_t"' failed.a ... #9 <address> llvm::APInt::getSExtValue() const <src-root>/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:1510:5 llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::SVal, clang::QualType, clang::QualType) <src-root>/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SValBuilder.cpp:607:24 clang::Expr const*, clang::ento::ExplodedNode*, clang::ento::ExplodedNodeSet&) <src-root>/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp:413:61 ... Fixes: llvm/llvm-project#61960 Reviewed By: donat.nagy
mfrancepillois
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 27, 2023
This crash was exposed recently in our randomized testing. _BitInts were not being handled properly during IntegerLiteral visitation. This patch addresses the problem for now. The BitIntType has no getKind() method, so the FoldingSetID is taken from the APInt value representing the _BitInt(), similar to other methods in StmtProfile.cpp. Crash seen (summary form): clang-tidy: <src-root>/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Casting.h:566: decltype(auto) llvm::cast(const From&) [with To = clang::BuiltinType; From = clang::QualType]: Assertion `isa<To>(Val) && "cast<Ty>() argument of incompatible type!"' failed ``` #9 <address> decltype(auto) llvm::cast<clang::BuiltinType, clang::QualType>(clang::QualType const&) <src-root>/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Casting.h:566:3 #10 <address> clang::BuiltinType const* clang::Type::castAs<clang::BuiltinType>() const <bin-root>/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/TypeNodes.inc:86:1 #11 <address> (anonymous namespace)::StmtProfiler::VisitIntegerLiteral( clang::IntegerLiteral const*) <src-root>/clang/lib/AST/StmtProfile.cpp:1362:64 #12 <address> clang::StmtVisitorBase<llvm::make_const_ptr, (anonymous namespace)::StmtProfiler, void>::Visit(clang::Stmt const*) <src-root>/clang/include/clang/AST/StmtNodes.inc:1225:1 ``` Reviewed By: donat.nagy
mfrancepillois
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 27, 2023
evalIntegralCast was using makeIntVal, and when _BitInt() types were introduced this exposed a crash in evalIntegralCast as a result. This is a reapply of a previous patch that failed post merge on the arm buildbots, because arm cannot handle large BitInts. Pinning the triple for the testcase solves that problem. Improve evalIntegralCast to use makeIntVal more efficiently to avoid the crash exposed by use of _BitInt. This was caught with our internal randomized testing. <src-root>/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:1510: int64_t llvm::APInt::getSExtValue() const: Assertion `getSignificantBits() <= 64 && "Too many bits for int64_t"' failed.a ... #9 <address> llvm::APInt::getSExtValue() const <src-root>/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:1510:5 llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::SVal, clang::QualType, clang::QualType) <src-root>/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SValBuilder.cpp:607:24 clang::Expr const*, clang::ento::ExplodedNode*, clang::ento::ExplodedNodeSet&) <src-root>/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp:413:61 ... Fixes: llvm/llvm-project#61960 Reviewed By: donat.nagy
reble
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 10, 2023
…fine.parallel verifier
This patch updates AffineParallelOp::verify() to check each result type matches
its corresponding reduction op (i.e, the result type must be a `FloatType` if
the reduction attribute is `addf`)
affine.parallel will crash on --lower-affine if the corresponding result type
cannot match the reduction attribute.
```
%128 = affine.parallel (%arg2, %arg3) = (0, 0) to (8, 7) reduce ("maxf") -> (memref<8x7xf32>) {
%alloc_33 = memref.alloc() : memref<8x7xf32>
affine.yield %alloc_33 : memref<8x7xf32>
}
```
This will crash and report a type conversion issue when we run `mlir-opt --lower-affine`
```
Assertion failed: (isa<To>(Val) && "cast<Ty>() argument of incompatible type!"), function cast, file Casting.h, line 572.
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace.
Stack dump:
0. Program arguments: mlir-opt --lower-affine temp.mlir
#0 0x0000000102a18f18 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x1002f8f18)
#1 0x0000000102a171b4 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x1002f71b4)
#2 0x0000000102a195c4 SignalHandler(int) (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x1002f95c4)
#3 0x00000001be7894c4 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_platform.dylib+0x1803414c4)
#4 0x00000001be771ee0 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_pthread.dylib+0x180329ee0)
#5 0x00000001be6ac340 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib+0x180264340)
#6 0x00000001be6ab754 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib+0x180263754)
#7 0x0000000106864790 mlir::arith::getIdentityValueAttr(mlir::arith::AtomicRMWKind, mlir::Type, mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location) (.cold.4) (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x104144790)
#8 0x0000000102ba66ac mlir::arith::getIdentityValueAttr(mlir::arith::AtomicRMWKind, mlir::Type, mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location) (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x1004866ac)
#9 0x0000000102ba6910 mlir::arith::getIdentityValue(mlir::arith::AtomicRMWKind, mlir::Type, mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location) (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x100486910)
...
```
Fixes #64068
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157985
reble
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 10, 2023
…s (#67212) This change avoids a crash in BasicValueFactory by checking the bit width of an APSInt to avoid calling getZExtValue if greater than 64-bits. This was caught by our internal, randomized test generator. Clang invocation clang -cc1 -analyzer-checker=optin.portability.UnixAPI case.c <src-root>/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:1488: uint64_t llvm::APInt::getZExtValue() const: Assertion `getActiveBits() <= 64 && "Too many bits for uint64_t"' failed. ... #9 <address> llvm::APInt::getZExtValue() const <src-root>/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:1488:5 clang::BinaryOperatorKind, llvm::APSInt const&, llvm::APSInt const&) <src-root>/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BasicValueFactory.cpp:307:37 llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::BinaryOperatorKind, clang::ento::NonLoc, clang::ento::NonLoc, clang::QualType) <src-root>/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SimpleSValBuilder.cpp:531:31 llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::BinaryOperatorKind, clang::ento::SVal, clang::ento::SVal, clang::QualType) <src-root>/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SValBuilder.cpp:532:26 ...
EwanC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2023
…tePluginObject After llvm/llvm-project#68052 this function changed from returning a nullptr with `return {};` to returning Expected and hitting `llvm_unreachable` before it could do so. I gather that we're never supposed to call this function, but on Windows we actually do call this function because `interpreter->CreateScriptedProcessInterface()` returns `ScriptedProcessInterface` not `ScriptedProcessPythonInterface`. Likely because `target_sp->GetDebugger().GetScriptInterpreter()` also does not return a Python related class. The previously XFAILed test crashed with: ``` # .---command stderr------------ # | PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. # | Stack dump: # | 0. Program arguments: c:\\users\\tcwg\\david.spickett\\build-llvm\\bin\\lldb-test.exe ir-memory-map C:\\Users\\tcwg\\david.spickett\\build-llvm\\tools\\lldb\\test\\Shell\\Expr\\Output\\TestIRMemoryMapWindows.test.tmp C:\\Users\\tcwg\\david.spickett\\llvm-project\\lldb\\test\\Shell\\Expr/Inputs/ir-memory-map-basic # | 1. HandleCommand(command = "run") # | Exception Code: 0xC000001D # | #0 0x00007ff696b5f588 lldb_private::ScriptedProcessInterface::CreatePluginObject(class llvm::StringRef, class lldb_private::ExecutionContext &, class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::StructuredData::Dictionary>, class lldb_private::StructuredData::Generic *) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\include\lldb\Interpreter\Interfaces\ScriptedProcessInterface.h:28:0 # | #1 0x00007ff696b1d808 llvm::Expected<std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::StructuredData::Generic> >::operator bool C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\llvm\include\llvm\Support\Error.h:567:0 # | #2 0x00007ff696b1d808 lldb_private::ScriptedProcess::ScriptedProcess(class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Target>, class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Listener>, class lldb_private::ScriptedMetadata const &, class lldb_private::Status &) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Plugins\Process\scripted\ScriptedProcess.cpp:115:0 # | #3 0x00007ff696b1d124 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::ScriptedProcess>::shared_ptr C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1478:0 # | #4 0x00007ff696b1d124 lldb_private::ScriptedProcess::CreateInstance(class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Target>, class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Listener>, class lldb_private::FileSpec const *, bool) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Plugins\Process\scripted\ScriptedProcess.cpp:61:0 # | #5 0x00007ff69699c8f4 std::_Ptr_base<lldb_private::Process>::_Move_construct_from C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1237:0 # | #6 0x00007ff69699c8f4 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::shared_ptr C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1534:0 # | #7 0x00007ff69699c8f4 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::operator= C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1594:0 # | #8 0x00007ff69699c8f4 lldb_private::Process::FindPlugin(class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Target>, class llvm::StringRef, class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Listener>, class lldb_private::FileSpec const *, bool) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Target\Process.cpp:396:0 # | #9 0x00007ff6969bd708 std::_Ptr_base<lldb_private::Process>::_Move_construct_from C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1237:0 # | #10 0x00007ff6969bd708 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::shared_ptr C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1534:0 # | #11 0x00007ff6969bd708 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::operator= C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1594:0 # | #12 0x00007ff6969bd708 lldb_private::Target::CreateProcess(class std::shared_ptr<class lldb_private::Listener>, class llvm::StringRef, class lldb_private::FileSpec const *, bool) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Target\Target.cpp:215:0 # | #13 0x00007ff696b13af0 std::_Ptr_base<lldb_private::Process>::_Ptr_base C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1230:0 # | #14 0x00007ff696b13af0 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::shared_ptr C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1524:0 # | #15 0x00007ff696b13af0 lldb_private::PlatformWindows::DebugProcess(class lldb_private::ProcessLaunchInfo &, class lldb_private::Debugger &, class lldb_private::Target &, class lldb_private::Status &) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Plugins\Platform\Windows\PlatformWindows.cpp:495:0 # | #16 0x00007ff6969cf590 std::_Ptr_base<lldb_private::Process>::_Move_construct_from C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1237:0 # | #17 0x00007ff6969cf590 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::shared_ptr C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1534:0 # | #18 0x00007ff6969cf590 std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>::operator= C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32124\include\memory:1594:0 # | #19 0x00007ff6969cf590 lldb_private::Target::Launch(class lldb_private::ProcessLaunchInfo &, class lldb_private::Stream *) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Target\Target.cpp:3274:0 # | #20 0x00007ff696fff82c CommandObjectProcessLaunch::DoExecute(class lldb_private::Args &, class lldb_private::CommandReturnObject &) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Commands\CommandObjectProcess.cpp:258:0 # | #21 0x00007ff696fab6c0 lldb_private::CommandObjectParsed::Execute(char const *, class lldb_private::CommandReturnObject &) C:\Users\tcwg\david.spickett\llvm-project\lldb\source\Interpreter\CommandObject.cpp:751:0 # `----------------------------- # error: command failed with exit status: 0xc000001d ``` That might be a bug on the Windows side, or an artifact of how our build is setup, but whatever it is, having `CreatePluginObject` return an error and the caller check it, fixes the failing test. The built lldb can run the script command to use Python, but I'm not sure if that means anything.
mfrancepillois
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 24, 2023
…ooking options for a custom subcommand (#71975) …ooking options for a custom subcommand. (#71776)" This reverts commit b88308b. The build-bot is unhappy (https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/186/builds/13096), `GroupingAndPrefix` fails after `TopLevelOptInSubcommand` (the newly added test). Revert while I look into this (might be related with test sharding but not sure) ``` [----------] 3 tests from CommandLineTest [ RUN ] CommandLineTest.TokenizeWindowsCommandLine2 [ OK ] CommandLineTest.TokenizeWindowsCommandLine2 (0 ms) [ RUN ] CommandLineTest.TopLevelOptInSubcommand [ OK ] CommandLineTest.TopLevelOptInSubcommand (0 ms) [ RUN ] CommandLineTest.GroupingAndPrefix #0 0x00ba8118 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x594118) #1 0x00ba5914 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x591914) #2 0x00ba89c4 SignalHandler(int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5949c4) #3 0xf7828530 __default_sa_restorer /build/glibc-9MGTF6/glibc-2.31/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/sigrestorer.S:67:0 #4 0x00af91f0 (anonymous namespace)::CommandLineParser::ResetAllOptionOccurrences() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x4e51f0) #5 0x00af8e1c llvm::cl::ResetCommandLineParser() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x4e4e1c) #6 0x0077cda0 (anonymous namespace)::CommandLineTest_GroupingAndPrefix_Test::TestBody() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x168da0) #7 0x00bc5adc testing::Test::Run() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5b1adc) #8 0x00bc6cc0 testing::TestInfo::Run() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5b2cc0) #9 0x00bc7880 testing::TestSuite::Run() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5b3880) #10 0x00bd7974 testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5c3974) #11 0x00bd6ebc testing::UnitTest::Run() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x5c2ebc) #12 0x00bb1058 main (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-armv7-global-isel/stage1/unittests/Support/./SupportTests+0x59d058) #13 0xf78185a4 __libc_start_main /build/glibc-9MGTF6/glibc-2.31/csu/libc-start.c:342:3 ```
EwanC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 3, 2024
This has been flaky for a while, for example https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/96/builds/50350 ``` Command Output (stdout): -- lldb version 18.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git revision 3974d89) clang revision 3974d89 llvm revision 3974d89 "can't evaluate expressions when the process is running." ``` ``` PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. #0 0x0000ffffa46191a0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x529a1a0) #1 0x0000ffffa4617144 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x5298144) #2 0x0000ffffa46198d0 SignalHandler(int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x529a8d0) #3 0x0000ffffab25b7dc (linux-vdso.so.1+0x7dc) #4 0x0000ffffab13d050 /build/glibc-Q8DG8B/glibc-2.31/string/../sysdeps/aarch64/multiarch/memcpy_advsimd.S:92:0 #5 0x0000ffffa446f420 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteRegisterContext::PrivateSetRegisterValue(unsigned int, llvm::ArrayRef<unsigned char>) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x50f0420) #6 0x0000ffffa446f7b8 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteRegisterContext::GetPrimordialRegister(lldb_private::RegisterInfo const*, lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunicationClient&) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x50f07b8) #7 0x0000ffffa446f308 lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteRegisterContext::ReadRegisterBytes(lldb_private::RegisterInfo const*) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x50f0308) #8 0x0000ffffa446ec1c lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteRegisterContext::ReadRegister(lldb_private::RegisterInfo const*, lldb_private::RegisterValue&) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x50efc1c) #9 0x0000ffffa412eaa4 lldb_private::RegisterContext::ReadRegisterAsUnsigned(lldb_private::RegisterInfo const*, unsigned long) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x4dafaa4) #10 0x0000ffffa420861c ReadLinuxProcessAddressMask(std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Process>, llvm::StringRef) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x4e8961c) #11 0x0000ffffa4208430 ABISysV_arm64::FixCodeAddress(unsigned long) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/build/lib/python3.8/site-packages/lldb/_lldb.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so+0x4e89430) ``` Judging by the backtrace something is trying to read the pointer authentication address/code mask registers. This explains why I've not seen this issue locally, as the buildbot runs on Graviton 3 with has the pointer authentication extension. I will try to reproduce, fix and re-enable the test.
EwanC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 27, 2024
…(#80904)" This reverts commit b1ac052. This commit breaks coroutine splitting for non-swift calling convention functions. In this example: ```ll ; ModuleID = 'repro.ll' source_filename = "stdlib/test/runtime/test_llcl.mojo" target datalayout = "e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" @0 = internal constant { i32, i32 } { i32 trunc (i64 sub (i64 ptrtoint (ptr @craSH to i64), i64 ptrtoint (ptr getelementptr inbounds ({ i32, i32 }, ptr @0, i32 0, i32 1) to i64)) to i32), i32 64 } define dso_local void @af_suspend_fn(ptr %0, i64 %1, ptr %2) #0 { ret void } define dso_local void @craSH(ptr %0) #0 { %2 = call token @llvm.coro.id.async(i32 64, i32 8, i32 0, ptr @0) %3 = call ptr @llvm.coro.begin(token %2, ptr null) %4 = getelementptr inbounds { ptr, { ptr, ptr }, i64, { ptr, i1 }, i64, i64 }, ptr poison, i32 0, i32 0 %5 = call ptr @llvm.coro.async.resume() store ptr %5, ptr %4, align 8 %6 = call { ptr, ptr, ptr } (i32, ptr, ptr, ...) @llvm.coro.suspend.async.sl_p0p0p0s(i32 0, ptr %5, ptr @ctxt_proj_fn, ptr @af_suspend_fn, ptr poison, i64 -1, ptr poison) ret void } define dso_local ptr @ctxt_proj_fn(ptr %0) #0 { ret ptr %0 } ; Function Attrs: nomerge nounwind declare { ptr, ptr, ptr } @llvm.coro.suspend.async.sl_p0p0p0s(i32, ptr, ptr, ...) #1 ; Function Attrs: nounwind declare token @llvm.coro.id.async(i32, i32, i32, ptr) #2 ; Function Attrs: nounwind declare ptr @llvm.coro.begin(token, ptr writeonly) #2 ; Function Attrs: nomerge nounwind declare ptr @llvm.coro.async.resume() #1 attributes #0 = { "target-features"="+adx,+aes,+avx,+avx2,+bmi,+bmi2,+clflushopt,+clwb,+clzero,+crc32,+cx16,+cx8,+f16c,+fma,+fsgsbase,+fxsr,+invpcid,+lzcnt,+mmx,+movbe,+mwaitx,+pclmul,+pku,+popcnt,+prfchw,+rdpid,+rdpru,+rdrnd,+rdseed,+sahf,+sha,+sse,+sse2,+sse3,+sse4.1,+sse4.2,+sse4a,+ssse3,+vaes,+vpclmulqdq,+wbnoinvd,+x87,+xsave,+xsavec,+xsaveopt,+xsaves" } attributes #1 = { nomerge nounwind } attributes #2 = { nounwind } ``` This verifier crashes after the `coro-split` pass with ``` cannot guarantee tail call due to mismatched parameter counts musttail call void @af_suspend_fn(ptr poison, i64 -1, ptr poison) LLVM ERROR: Broken function PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: opt ../../../reduced.ll -O0 #0 0x00007f1d89645c0e __interceptor_backtrace.part.0 /build/gcc-11-XeT9lY/gcc-11-11.4.0/build/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsanitizer/asan/../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:4193:28 #1 0x0000556d94d254f7 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:723:22 #2 0x0000556d94d19a2f llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:105:20 #3 0x0000556d94d1aa42 SignalHandler(int) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:371:36 #4 0x00007f1d88e42520 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x42520) #5 0x00007f1d88e969fc __pthread_kill_implementation ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44:76 #6 0x00007f1d88e969fc __pthread_kill_internal ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:78:10 #7 0x00007f1d88e969fc pthread_kill ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:89:10 #8 0x00007f1d88e42476 gsignal ./signal/../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:27:6 #9 0x00007f1d88e287f3 abort ./stdlib/abort.c:81:7 #10 0x0000556d8944be01 std::vector<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>>::size() const /usr/include/c++/11/bits/stl_vector.h:919:40 #11 0x0000556d8944be01 bool std::operator==<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>>(std::vector<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>> const&, std::vector<llvm::json::Value, std::allocator<llvm::json::Value>> const&) /usr/include/c++/11/bits/stl_vector.h:1893:23 #12 0x0000556d8944be01 llvm::json::operator==(llvm::json::Array const&, llvm::json::Array const&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/JSON.h:572:69 #13 0x0000556d8944be01 llvm::json::operator==(llvm::json::Value const&, llvm::json::Value const&) (.cold) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/JSON.cpp:204:28 #14 0x0000556d949ed2bd llvm::report_fatal_error(char const*, bool) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/ErrorHandling.cpp:82:70 #15 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::SmallVectorBase<unsigned int>::size() const /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:91:32 #16 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::SmallVectorTemplateCommon<llvm::DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase::Argument, void>::end() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:282:41 #17 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::SmallVector<llvm::DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase::Argument, 4u>::~SmallVector() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:1215:24 #18 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase::~DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h:413:7 #19 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::DiagnosticInfoIROptimization::~DiagnosticInfoIROptimization() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h:622:7 #20 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::OptimizationRemark::~OptimizationRemark() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h:689:7 #21 0x0000556d8e37e876 operator() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroSplit.cpp:2213:14 #22 0x0000556d8e37e876 emit<llvm::CoroSplitPass::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::CGSCCAnalysisManager&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&)::<lambda()> > /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/OptimizationRemarkEmitter.h:83:12 #23 0x0000556d8e37e876 llvm::CoroSplitPass::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroSplit.cpp:2212:13 #24 0x0000556d8c36ecb1 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::CoroSplitPass, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3 #25 0x0000556d91c1a84f llvm::PassManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp:90:12 #26 0x0000556d8c3690d1 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::PassManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&>::run(llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::LazyCallGraph::SCC, llvm::LazyCallGraph&>&, llvm::LazyCallGraph&, llvm::CGSCCUpdateResult&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3 #27 0x0000556d91c2162d llvm::ModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp:278:18 #28 0x0000556d8c369035 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::Module, llvm::ModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3 #29 0x0000556d9457abc5 llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h:247:20 #30 0x0000556d8e30979e llvm::CoroConditionalWrapper::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Coroutines/CoroConditionalWrapper.cpp:19:74 #31 0x0000556d8c365755 llvm::detail::PassModel<llvm::Module, llvm::CoroConditionalWrapper, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManagerInternal.h:91:3 #32 0x0000556d9457abc5 llvm::PassManager<llvm::Module, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>>::run(llvm::Module&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Module>&) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h:247:20 #33 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSetImplBase::isSmall() const /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:196:33 #34 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSetImplBase::~SmallPtrSetImplBase() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:84:17 #35 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSetImpl<llvm::AnalysisKey*>::~SmallPtrSetImpl() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:321:7 #36 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::SmallPtrSet<llvm::AnalysisKey*, 2u>::~SmallPtrSet() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h:427:7 #37 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::PreservedAnalyses::~PreservedAnalyses() /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Analysis.h:109:7 #38 0x0000556d89818556 llvm::runPassPipeline(llvm::StringRef, llvm::Module&, llvm::TargetMachine*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfoImpl*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::ToolOutputFile*, llvm::StringRef, llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::PassPlugin>, llvm::ArrayRef<std::function<void (llvm::PassBuilder&)>>, llvm::opt_tool::OutputKind, llvm::opt_tool::VerifierKind, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool) /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/NewPMDriver.cpp:532:10 #39 0x0000556d897e3939 optMain /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/optdriver.cpp:737:27 #40 0x0000556d89455461 main /home/ubuntu/modular/third-party/llvm-project/llvm/tools/opt/opt.cpp:25:33 #41 0x00007f1d88e29d90 __libc_start_call_main ./csu/../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58:16 #42 0x00007f1d88e29e40 call_init ./csu/../csu/libc-start.c:128:20 #43 0x00007f1d88e29e40 __libc_start_main ./csu/../csu/libc-start.c:379:5 #44 0x0000556d897b6335 _start (/home/ubuntu/modular/.derived/third-party/llvm-project/build-relwithdebinfo-asan/bin/opt+0x150c335) Aborted (core dumped)
EwanC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2024
TestCases/Misc/Linux/sigaction.cpp fails because dlsym() may call malloc on failure. And then the wrapped malloc appears to access thread local storage using global dynamic accesses, thus calling ___interceptor___tls_get_addr, before REAL(__tls_get_addr) has been set, so we get a crash inside ___interceptor___tls_get_addr. For example, this can happen when looking up __isoc23_scanf which might not exist in some libcs. Fix this by marking the thread local variable accessed inside the debug checks as "initial-exec", which does not require __tls_get_addr. This is probably a better alternative to llvm/llvm-project#83886. This fixes a different crash but is related to llvm/llvm-project#46204. Backtrace: ``` #0 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #1 0x00007ffff6a9d89e in ___interceptor___tls_get_addr (arg=0x7ffff6b27be8) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:2759 #2 0x00007ffff6a46bc6 in __sanitizer::CheckedMutex::LockImpl (this=0x7ffff6b27be8, pc=140737331846066) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.cpp:218 #3 0x00007ffff6a448b2 in __sanitizer::CheckedMutex::Lock (this=0x7ffff6b27be8, this@entry=0x730000000580) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:129 #4 __sanitizer::Mutex::Lock (this=0x7ffff6b27be8, this@entry=0x730000000580) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:167 #5 0x00007ffff6abdbb2 in __sanitizer::GenericScopedLock<__sanitizer::Mutex>::GenericScopedLock (mu=0x730000000580, this=<optimized out>) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:383 #6 __sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<__tsan::AP64>::GetFromAllocator (this=0x7ffff7487dc0 <__tsan::allocator_placeholder>, stat=stat@entry=0x7ffff570db68, class_id=11, chunks=chunks@entry=0x7ffff5702cc8, n_chunks=n_chunks@entry=128) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator_primary64.h:207 #7 0x00007ffff6abdaa0 in __sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64LocalCache<__sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<__tsan::AP64> >::Refill (this=<optimized out>, c=c@entry=0x7ffff5702cb8, allocator=<optimized out>, class_id=<optimized out>) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator_local_cache.h:103 #8 0x00007ffff6abd731 in __sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64LocalCache<__sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<__tsan::AP64> >::Allocate (this=0x7ffff6b27be8, allocator=0x7ffff5702cc8, class_id=140737311157448) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator_local_cache.h:39 #9 0x00007ffff6abc397 in __sanitizer::CombinedAllocator<__sanitizer::SizeClassAllocator64<__tsan::AP64>, __sanitizer::LargeMmapAllocatorPtrArrayDynamic>::Allocate (this=0x7ffff5702cc8, cache=0x7ffff6b27be8, size=<optimized out>, size@entry=175, alignment=alignment@entry=16) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator_combined.h:69 #10 0x00007ffff6abaa6a in __tsan::user_alloc_internal (thr=0x7ffff7ebd980, pc=140737331499943, sz=sz@entry=175, align=align@entry=16, signal=true) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_mman.cpp:198 #11 0x00007ffff6abb0d1 in __tsan::user_alloc (thr=0x7ffff6b27be8, pc=140737331846066, sz=11, sz@entry=175) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_mman.cpp:223 #12 0x00007ffff6a693b5 in ___interceptor_malloc (size=175) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:666 #13 0x00007ffff7fce7f2 in malloc (size=175) at ../include/rtld-malloc.h:56 #14 __GI__dl_exception_create_format (exception=exception@entry=0x7fffffffd0d0, objname=0x7ffff7fc3550 "/path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/cmake-build-all-sanitizers/lib/linux/libclang_rt.tsan-x86_64.so", fmt=fmt@entry=0x7ffff7ff2db9 "undefined symbol: %s%s%s") at ./elf/dl-exception.c:157 #15 0x00007ffff7fd50e8 in _dl_lookup_symbol_x (undef_name=0x7ffff6af868b "__isoc23_scanf", undef_map=<optimized out>, ref=0x7fffffffd148, symbol_scope=<optimized out>, version=<optimized out>, type_class=0, flags=2, skip_map=0x7ffff7fc35e0) at ./elf/dl-lookup.c:793 --Type <RET> for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging-- #16 0x00007ffff656d6ed in do_sym (handle=<optimized out>, name=0x7ffff6af868b "__isoc23_scanf", who=0x7ffff6a3bb84 <__interception::InterceptFunction(char const*, unsigned long*, unsigned long, unsigned long)+36>, vers=vers@entry=0x0, flags=flags@entry=2) at ./elf/dl-sym.c:146 #17 0x00007ffff656d9dd in _dl_sym (handle=<optimized out>, name=<optimized out>, who=<optimized out>) at ./elf/dl-sym.c:195 #18 0x00007ffff64a2854 in dlsym_doit (a=a@entry=0x7fffffffd3b0) at ./dlfcn/dlsym.c:40 #19 0x00007ffff7fcc489 in __GI__dl_catch_exception (exception=exception@entry=0x7fffffffd310, operate=0x7ffff64a2840 <dlsym_doit>, args=0x7fffffffd3b0) at ./elf/dl-catch.c:237 #20 0x00007ffff7fcc5af in _dl_catch_error (objname=0x7fffffffd368, errstring=0x7fffffffd370, mallocedp=0x7fffffffd367, operate=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>) at ./elf/dl-catch.c:256 #21 0x00007ffff64a2257 in _dlerror_run (operate=operate@entry=0x7ffff64a2840 <dlsym_doit>, args=args@entry=0x7fffffffd3b0) at ./dlfcn/dlerror.c:138 #22 0x00007ffff64a28e5 in dlsym_implementation (dl_caller=<optimized out>, name=<optimized out>, handle=<optimized out>) at ./dlfcn/dlsym.c:54 #23 ___dlsym (handle=<optimized out>, name=<optimized out>) at ./dlfcn/dlsym.c:68 #24 0x00007ffff6a3bb84 in __interception::GetFuncAddr (name=0x7ffff6af868b "__isoc23_scanf", trampoline=140737311157448) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_linux.cpp:42 #25 __interception::InterceptFunction (name=0x7ffff6af868b "__isoc23_scanf", ptr_to_real=0x7ffff74850e8 <__interception::real___isoc23_scanf>, func=11, trampoline=140737311157448) at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_linux.cpp:61 #26 0x00007ffff6a9f2d9 in InitializeCommonInterceptors () at /path/to/llvm/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/../../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:10315 ``` Reviewed By: vitalybuka, MaskRay Pull Request: llvm/llvm-project#83890
reble
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 17, 2024
Random testing found that the Z3 wrapper does not support UnarySymExpr, which was added recently and not included in the original Z3 wrapper. For now, just avoid submitting expressions to Z3 to avoid compiler crashes. Some crash context ... clang -cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core z3-unarysymexpr.c -analyzer-constraints=z3 Unsupported expression to reason about! UNREACHABLE executed at clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/SMTConstraintManager.h:297! Stack dump: 3. <root>/clang/test/Analysis/z3-unarysymexpr.c:13:7: Error evaluating branch #0 <addr> llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) #1 <addr> llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() #8 <addr> clang::ento::SimpleConstraintManager::assumeAux( llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::NonLoc, bool) #9 <addr> clang::ento::SimpleConstraintManager::assume( llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>, clang::ento::NonLoc, bool) Co-authored-by: einvbri <vince.a.bridgers@ericsson.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Decide on wording for submitting an executable graph while another instance of the same executable graph is still executing.
The current SYCL_EXT_ONEAPI_GRAPH wording is
While SYCL_EXT_CODEPLAY_GRAPHS wording is
With the current specified behaviour it is hard for the user to know if the runtime will throw an error or not when they write application code attempting this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: