-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-108963: using random to generate unique string in sys.intern test #109491
Conversation
aisk
commented
Sep 16, 2023
•
edited by bedevere-app
bot
Loading
edited by bedevere-app
bot
- Issue: test_sys.test_intern() fails if run more than once in the same process #108963
This change hides the issue that the test actually leaks memory: intern a string which is then only released at Python exit. Can we add a private deintern() function in _testcapi? Or run the test in a subprocess? Well, i don't know that it's a big deal, this change is ooookay-ish. |
Lib/test/test_sys.py
Outdated
self.assertRaises(TypeError, sys.intern) | ||
s = "never interned before" + str(INTERN_NUMRUNS) | ||
s = "never interned before" + str(random.random()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would prefer using random.randint(), for example 10**9 to have 9 random digits. I prefer to avoid float when possible 😁 Same below.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But this increases the probability of random failure from 1/253 (about 1/1016) to 1/(9*10**8). If run the test every second, there will be a failure every 30 years in average.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On my machine, the random.random()
returns something like 0.35934878814573135
, which have 18 digits (with the first zero). So can we just increase the max range to 10 ** 18
to keep the random resolution almost like as the random.random()
?
Lib/test/test_sys.py
Outdated
@@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ def test_43581(self): | |||
|
|||
def test_intern(self): | |||
self.assertRaises(TypeError, sys.intern) | |||
s = "never interned before" + str(random.int(10**8, 10**9)) | |||
s = "never interned before" + str(random.randint(10**8, 10**9)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the intention is to generate random 9-digit numbers, use randrange()
instead of randint()
.
Lib/test/test_sys.py
Outdated
@@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ def test_43581(self): | |||
|
|||
def test_intern(self): | |||
self.assertRaises(TypeError, sys.intern) | |||
s = "never interned before" + str(random.random()) | |||
s = "never interned before" + str(random.int(10**8, 10**9)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
random.int doesn't exist. What's the point of putting a minimum at 10**8? Why not 0?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a more recent commit in the PR fixed the bug. The minimal start is for ensure the random parts have 9 digits, I think it's more consistent.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i don't think that the string length (number of random int digits) matters here, does it?
Lib/test/test_sys.py
Outdated
self.assertRaises(TypeError, sys.intern) | ||
s = "never interned before" + str(INTERN_NUMRUNS) | ||
s = "never interned before" + str(random.randrange(0, 10**18)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, for me 9 digits was already way enough. 18 digits is just too much 😁 You can just pass the max value:
s = "never interned before" + str(random.randrange(0, 10**18)) | |
s = "never interned before" + str(random.randrange(10**9)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
It makes me sad to leak memory. But I'm not sure about a private API to de-intern a string. I'm not sure of the consequences.
Sorry, @aisk and @vstinner, I could not cleanly backport this to
|
… test (python#109491) (cherry picked from commit 44b1e4e)
GH-110216 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch. |