-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 209
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GSoC Forum. #963
Comments
|
|
@niravasher I am currently focusing on Webworkers and WebAssembly for my proposal. Also text overlay module is already solved, so you can proceed with some other ones. @jywarren request you to include some more ideas as some of them are already solved. Thanks |
|
|
Hi! I am working on gpu.js and it won't be big change. Also is @Divy123 working on this? I didn't know that. Please clarify. This will probably be my last contribution in the next 2 yrs(i will be busy for 2 yrs) so I want to work on it myself. Thank You |
Please note that I am not participating in GSoC(im not eligible for that). |
@harshkhandeparkar I am not working on gpu.js but on webworkers and webassembly. |
And just to clarify - we are perfectly OK with pursuing multiple
optimization strategies at once -- parallel tracks will let us pick and
choose pros and cons since some will work better for some scenarios and
others for other scenarios. Thank you all so much!
…On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 4:44 PM Slytherin ***@***.***> wrote:
@harshkhandeparkar <https://github.com/HarshKhandeparkar> I am not
working on gpu.js but on webworkers and webassembly.
Also exploring various libraries that can help us in webgl.
Thanks a lot @harshkhandeparkar <https://github.com/HarshKhandeparkar>
for your outstanding contributions.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#963 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABfJ0DEm6NL7M8St0pVGD46ekdXHEkkks5vcR4SgaJpZM4cUQTl>
.
|
@jywarren do you require a switch to GPU.js just to change the speed?. I think the modules are fast enough and do not take much time to load. |
Hello @niravasher We are looking at more computationally intensive modules, specifically edge detect. In the future we might have more modules like that. |
@niravasher edge detect already times out the browser |
* when used with hysteresis. |
@harshkhandeparkar @jywarren @tech4GT correct me if I am wrong GSoC 2019 the only module to be shifted to GPGPU is edgeDetect |
In issue #849 you mentioned to change the entire pixelManipulation API to be dependent on GPU. So I thought all the modules are to be shifted to GPU @harshkhandeparkar |
All of these can benefit from gpu.js |
Btw, I am going to do this myself so try finding some other issue/idea to add to your proposal. Sorry. |
Ok, In the list of real world cases since the particle filtration module is completed, I will make blob region detection module |
Hi all - just to mention, we have in the past had multiple people working on the same project in collaboration, either breaking it into 2 parts, or supporting one another, so this is not a problem. Second, we are exploring several parallel tracks for speeding up performance across many different modules; some solutions will work better for some modules, others for different modules. So we are also OK with exploring different optimization paths at the same time -- and the new speed benchmarking code is intended to help us evaluate what speeds up by how much! Thank you! |
@niravasher do you have any other doubts or should this be closed? |
Let it remain for some more time please. |
Np. You can keep it open for as long as you like. |
Leave it. So that someone who have doubt about GSoC can ask here. |
So should we change the issue name to like GSoC forum? |
Also change the issue body? |
Yeah do it. |
I don't have time. Can you do that? Also there is no rush. We can do it later whenever we get time but if you have time right now, please do. Thanks. |
What is YPAE06? |
I don't exactly know the fullform. It was in one of the issues. I searched this on internet. I found many results like these polygonal images |
Can you please drop a link to the issue? |
The isue also links to a demo. |
It shows me WEBRTC not available. Can i do something? |
Infact all the modules show this |
It needs a webcam. Try it on ur phone. |
I am getting a blue line for all the ideas. It is not loading somehow I think. Could you post a screenshot? @harshkhandeparkar @jywarren @tech4GT |
Also how do we test the modules that are not supported for browsers??? |
Which modules are not supported for browsers? |
@niravasher I tested for text overlay module which works only in browser, #943 you can have an idea from here. |
Yeah I believe there is one, don't exactly remember which one it was.
…On Wed, Apr 3, 2019, 5:08 PM Harsh Khandeparkar ***@***.***> wrote:
Which modules are not supported for browsers?
—
You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#963 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZUPyKszzmTD9w-JURrvV2GFcGbwwUfoks5vdJKZgaJpZM4cUQTl>
.
|
Thanks @aashna27 , found what I was looking for |
There is an issue open in the image sequencer https://github.com/publiclab/image-sequencer/issues/962 . This is the regarding making the geotiff module. I don't have mapknitter installed right now and very little time left with submitting the proposal, could somenone please explain me exactly what to do tn this issue? @jywarren @harshithpabbati @harshkhandeparkar , @tech4GT you have opened the issue, can you please help me with this?? @Divy123 do you have any idea on this?? @publiclab/is-reviewers |
Hi @niravasher Actually I would be working on that pretty soon, So it is a part of this new mapknitter exporter process that we are building over at https://github.com/publiclab/image-sequencer-app If you would like to help out on that you can read more about geotiff in general and more specifically how we can make one in image sequencer. 😄 |
@tech4GT is https://github.com/publiclab/image-sequencer-app an active GSoC project this year? Looks really cool. Could you point me to the prerequisites and future roadmaps for the project? Would love to explore |
I'm not sure about gsoc. I think @jywarren might be able to clarify. |
Hello,
It's peak time for GSoC proposals. So you may have many doubts to ask and would possibly don't find any place to ask. You can ask your doubt's here!!
All the best for your proposals 😄
We hope many contributions from you.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: