Biome part 2 #621
Biome part 2 #621
Conversation
CoMPaTech
added
enhancement
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new "Biome lint" step in the GitHub Actions workflow, enhancing linting capabilities by integrating the Biome tool. Modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #621 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 20 20
Lines 3360 3360
=========================================
Hits 3360 3360 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@coderabbitai review please :) |
|
@CoMPaTech: I will review the changes. Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
scripts/tests_and_coverage.sh (1)
53-53: Consider making the echo statement conditional if needed.The echo statement provides useful information about the tool being used to process fixtures and test data. However, since it is executed unconditionally after the manual fixture crafting step, it may not always be relevant.
If the Biome processing step is not always run, consider making the echo statement conditional based on whether the Biome command is actually executed.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (39)
- .github/workflows/verify.yml (1 hunks)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- .pre-commit-config.yaml (3 hunks)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- fixtures/adam_heatpump_cooling/all_data.json (11 hunks)
- fixtures/adam_jip/all_data.json (5 hunks)
- fixtures/adam_multiple_devices_per_zone/all_data.json (5 hunks)
- fixtures/adam_onoff_cooling_fake_firmware/all_data.json (2 hunks)
- fixtures/adam_plus_anna/all_data.json (1 hunks)
- fixtures/adam_plus_anna_new/all_data.json (3 hunks)
- fixtures/adam_zone_per_device/all_data.json (5 hunks)
- fixtures/anna_elga_2/all_data.json (1 hunks)
- fixtures/anna_elga_2_cooling/all_data.json (1 hunks)
- fixtures/anna_elga_2_schedule_off/all_data.json (1 hunks)
- fixtures/anna_elga_no_cooling/all_data.json (1 hunks)
- fixtures/anna_heatpump_cooling/all_data.json (1 hunks)
- fixtures/anna_heatpump_cooling_fake_firmware/all_data.json (1 hunks)
- fixtures/anna_heatpump_heating/all_data.json (1 hunks)
- fixtures/anna_loria_cooling_active/all_data.json (2 hunks)
- fixtures/anna_loria_driessens/all_data.json (2 hunks)
- fixtures/anna_loria_heating_idle/all_data.json (2 hunks)
- fixtures/anna_v4/all_data.json (1 hunks)
- fixtures/anna_v4_dhw/all_data.json (1 hunks)
- fixtures/anna_v4_no_tag/all_data.json (1 hunks)
- fixtures/anna_without_boiler_fw441/all_data.json (1 hunks)
- fixtures/legacy_anna/all_data.json (1 hunks)
- fixtures/legacy_anna_2/all_data.json (1 hunks)
- fixtures/m_adam_cooling/all_data.json (3 hunks)
- fixtures/m_adam_heating/all_data.json (3 hunks)
- fixtures/m_adam_jip/all_data.json (5 hunks)
- fixtures/m_adam_multiple_devices_per_zone/all_data.json (5 hunks)
- fixtures/m_anna_heatpump_cooling/all_data.json (1 hunks)
- fixtures/m_anna_heatpump_idle/all_data.json (1 hunks)
- fixtures/stretch_v23/all_data.json (1 hunks)
- pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
- scripts/python-venv.sh (1 hunks)
- scripts/setup.sh (1 hunks)
- scripts/setup_test.sh (1 hunks)
- scripts/tests_and_coverage.sh (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (33)
- CHANGELOG.md
- fixtures/adam_heatpump_cooling/all_data.json
- fixtures/adam_jip/all_data.json
- fixtures/adam_multiple_devices_per_zone/all_data.json
- fixtures/adam_onoff_cooling_fake_firmware/all_data.json
- fixtures/adam_plus_anna/all_data.json
- fixtures/adam_plus_anna_new/all_data.json
- fixtures/adam_zone_per_device/all_data.json
- fixtures/anna_elga_2/all_data.json
- fixtures/anna_elga_2_cooling/all_data.json
- fixtures/anna_elga_2_schedule_off/all_data.json
- fixtures/anna_elga_no_cooling/all_data.json
- fixtures/anna_heatpump_cooling/all_data.json
- fixtures/anna_heatpump_cooling_fake_firmware/all_data.json
- fixtures/anna_heatpump_heating/all_data.json
- fixtures/anna_loria_cooling_active/all_data.json
- fixtures/anna_loria_driessens/all_data.json
- fixtures/anna_loria_heating_idle/all_data.json
- fixtures/anna_v4/all_data.json
- fixtures/anna_v4_dhw/all_data.json
- fixtures/anna_v4_no_tag/all_data.json
- fixtures/anna_without_boiler_fw441/all_data.json
- fixtures/legacy_anna/all_data.json
- fixtures/legacy_anna_2/all_data.json
- fixtures/m_adam_cooling/all_data.json
- fixtures/m_adam_heating/all_data.json
- fixtures/m_adam_jip/all_data.json
- fixtures/m_adam_multiple_devices_per_zone/all_data.json
- fixtures/m_anna_heatpump_cooling/all_data.json
- fixtures/m_anna_heatpump_idle/all_data.json
- fixtures/stretch_v23/all_data.json
- pyproject.toml
- scripts/python-venv.sh
Additional comments not posted (14)
scripts/setup.sh (2)
16-16: Verify the purpose and necessity of theuvpackage.The
uvpackage has been added to thepip installcommand along with the existingwheelpackage. Please clarify the purpose and necessity of theuvpackage in the installation process.Is it a requirement or an optional enhancement? Ensure that the addition of
uvaligns with the project's dependencies and goals.
17-17: Verify the purpose ofuvand ensure the security of external dependencies.
The installation command now uses
uv pip installinstead of justpip install. Please clarify the purpose and necessity of usinguvin the installation process. Is it a requirement or an optional enhancement? Ensure that the addition ofuvaligns with the project's dependencies and goals.The command is specifying requirements and constraints files from external URLs. While this approach provides flexibility, it could potentially introduce security risks if the URLs are not trusted or controlled. Consider using trusted and controlled URLs for these files to mitigate potential security vulnerabilities. Alternatively, consider hosting the files within the project repository itself to ensure their integrity.
scripts/setup_test.sh (5)
14-14: LGTM!The code segment correctly creates the temporary directory using the
mkdir -pcommand, which is a standard practice.
17-17: Verify the package management change.The code segment correctly installs the test requirements using the
uv pipcommand. The use ofuv pipinstead ofpipmay indicate a shift in the package management approach. Please ensure that this change is intentional and aligns with the project's package management strategy.
20-27: LGTM!The code segment correctly fetches and updates the biome CLI tool based on the system architecture. It handles the case where the architecture cannot be determined by exiting with an error message, which is a good practice.
30-30: LGTM!The code segment correctly makes the biome binary executable using the
chmod +xcommand, which is necessary for running the tool.
33-35: LGTM!The code segment correctly installs the pre-commit hook conditionally based on the number of arguments passed to the script. This adds flexibility to the script's execution, allowing the hook to be skipped if needed.
scripts/tests_and_coverage.sh (2)
46-50: LGTM!The conditional block ensures that the manual fixture crafting script is only run locally or when explicitly requested, which helps to prevent unintended overwriting of fixtures during the GitHub run of testing.
The TODO item #313 suggests that there is a plan to handle the fixture generation process more gracefully on merge using a GitHub action. This is a good idea to streamline the process and ensure consistency across different environments.
54-54: LGTM!The Biome command is a good addition to the script as it helps to maintain code quality and consistency by linting the staged files.
The flags used in the command (
--files-ignore-unknown=trueand--no-errors-on-unmatched) provide flexibility in handling unknown or unmatched files, which may be useful in certain scenarios..pre-commit-config.yaml (4)
4-4: LGTM!The addition of
setup,setup_test, andbiometo theskiplist is consistent with the introduction of new hooks with the same names later in the file. This change ensures that these hooks are not executed during pre-commit checks.
70-73: LGTM!The introduction of the
setuphook is a great addition to ensure a consistent development environment. By checking for the presence of a virtual environment and running the setup script if necessary, this hook helps maintain a standardized environment across different machines and users.
74-77: LGTM!The
setup_testhook is a valuable addition to ensure a consistent testing environment. By verifying the presence of the./tmp/biomefile and running the testing setup script if necessary, this hook helps maintain a standardized testing environment and ensures that necessary dependencies are installed before running tests.
103-105: LGTM!The introduction of the
biomehook for local linting is a positive change. By integrating Biome directly into the pre-commit workflow and using local installation, it streamlines the linting process. The command-line options used, such as--staged,--files-ignore-unknown=true, and--no-errors-on-unmatched, provide flexibility in handling unknown and unmatched files during linting..github/workflows/verify.yml (1)
160-164: Excellent addition of the Biome linting step!The new "Biome lint" step is a valuable enhancement to the GitHub Actions workflow. It ensures that the codebase adheres to the rules and best practices defined by the Biome tool, further improving code quality and maintainability.
The step is well-integrated into the existing workflow, running after the pylint step and before the markdown linting step. It activates the Python virtual environment, downloads the latest release of the Biome tool, and uses the
pre-commitframework to run the linting process on all files.Great job on adding this step to strengthen the code quality checks in the workflow!
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Style