Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(tidb-client): wrong status api property #944

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 28, 2021

Conversation

shhdgit
Copy link
Member

@shhdgit shhdgit commented Jun 28, 2021

Fix the bug that tidbClient.WithStatusAPIAddress didn't work. This causes profiling and debugapi to pick an unexpected tidb instance.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • breeswish

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@breezewish
Copy link
Member

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 9e355c9

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit baf12c9 into pingcap:master Jun 28, 2021
shhdgit added a commit to shhdgit/tidb-dashboard that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2021
breezewish pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2021
* tweak(ui): support `sameWeek` format (#937)
* fix(stmt & slowquery): ignored virtual fields (#939)
* fix: Apple Silicon / Darwin arm64 compatibility (#940)
* fix(tidb-client): wrong status api property (#944)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants