-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 136
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(stmt & slowquery): ignored virtual fields #939
Conversation
05ea2ec
to
f8afa37
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great! Could you also test whether sorting works for it?
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
Yes, it works. Because it's sorted on the client. |
/merge |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: f8afa37
|
I think we need some rest and clean up some tech debt! For example, adding some tests. |
Append ignored virtual fields to table_columns api. Then plan_count came back.