Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

drainer: fix kafka message limit problem #1039

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Oct 11, 2021

Conversation

lichunzhu
Copy link
Contributor

@lichunzhu lichunzhu commented Apr 16, 2021

What problem does this PR solve?

close #1156
When we use kafka as downstream, the transaction size exceed 1G can't to transport to downstream.

What is changed and how it works?

  1. Set grpc message limit to IntMax instead of max.Int32.
  2. Add configuration max-message-size in drainer's config.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test

Code changes

  • Has exported variable/fields change

Related changes

  • Need to cherry-pick to the release branch
  • Need to be included in the release note

Release note

  • Set grpc message limit to IntMax instead of max.Int32. Add configuration max-message-size in drainer's config.

@sre-bot
Copy link

sre-bot commented Apr 16, 2021

@lichunzhu
Copy link
Contributor Author

/rebuild

@lichunzhu
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

1 similar comment
@lichunzhu
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@lichunzhu
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@lichunzhu
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

maxMsgSize = maxKafkaMsgSize

if cfg.SyncerCfg.To.KafkaMaxMessageSize > 0 {
maxMsgSize = cfg.SyncerCfg.To.KafkaMaxMessageSize
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What if KafkaMaxMessageSize > MaxInt32 。 I think we need to do this check here

@sre-bot
Copy link

sre-bot commented Sep 14, 2021

@lichunzhu
Copy link
Contributor Author

/rebuild

@lichunzhu
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Sep 15, 2021

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • amyangfei
  • glorv

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@lichunzhu
Copy link
Contributor Author

/rebuild

@glorv
Copy link
Contributor

glorv commented Oct 11, 2021

/run-check

@glorv
Copy link
Contributor

glorv commented Oct 11, 2021

/run-all-tests

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #1077.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #1078.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #1079.

ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tidb-binlog that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2021
ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tidb-binlog that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2021
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #1080.

@niubell
Copy link

niubell commented Apr 14, 2022

close pingcap/tidb#28659

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

pump/drainer: binlog can't replicate data any more if filtered binlog exceeds 2G
6 participants