Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why is this repo MIT when it is all contributed code? #72

Closed
samreid opened this issue Jul 24, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

Why is this repo MIT when it is all contributed code? #72

samreid opened this issue Jul 24, 2017 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@samreid
Copy link
Member

samreid commented Jul 24, 2017

phetsims/tasks#875

@samreid
Copy link
Member Author

samreid commented Jul 24, 2017

Scheduled for developer meeting to decide how to license this repo

@samreid samreid removed their assignment Jul 24, 2017
@pixelzoom
Copy link
Contributor

pixelzoom commented Jul 26, 2017

Reviewed for developer meeting. Licensing is outside of my area.

@jonathanolson
Copy link
Contributor

Presumably each item is licensed individually, and the concept of "license for the repo" may not make sense?

@jbphet
Copy link
Contributor

jbphet commented Jul 27, 2017

+1 for the suggestion that having a license doesn't make sense in this case.

@samreid
Copy link
Member Author

samreid commented Jul 27, 2017

I'll update LICENSE.md to say "See the license.json file" or equivalent.

@samreid samreid self-assigned this Jul 27, 2017
samreid added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 1, 2017
samreid added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 1, 2017
samreid added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 1, 2017
@samreid
Copy link
Member Author

samreid commented Aug 1, 2017

Updated, new version is here, closing:

https://github.com/phetsims/sherpa/blob/master/LICENSE.md

@samreid samreid closed this as completed Aug 1, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants