Fix for super() usage on "old style class" ZipFile #546
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I was experiencing an error of "TypeError: must be type, not classobj"
on the line using
super()._extract_member()
below.This error appears to be due to the
zipfile.ZipFile
class never inheriting fromobject
which is a requirement since py2.2 (2001).Since the use of
super()
inPermPreservingZipFile()
depends onobject
being somewhere in the inheritance tree, I am including it inthe class definition of
PermPreservingZipFile()
. My testing of this patchlocally has proven to solve the "TypeError" I was seeing.