Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to fixed rust-cache action. #21589

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 30, 2024

Conversation

benjyw
Copy link
Contributor

@benjyw benjyw commented Oct 30, 2024

The previous one had a regression in the compiled .js files.

@benjyw benjyw added needs-cherrypick category:internal CI, fixes for not-yet-released features, etc. labels Oct 30, 2024
@benjyw benjyw added this to the 2.21.x milestone Oct 30, 2024
@benjyw benjyw requested a review from huonw October 30, 2024 00:35
Copy link
Contributor

@huonw huonw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks.

Preserving the slack discussion for context: https://pantsbuild.slack.com/archives/C0D7TNJHL/p1730098922404299

when I rebased my patch onto a later version of the upstream action, I screwed up handling the compiled js, so it had basically reverted to the pre-patch state. Now I have regenerated it from scratch (which is what I should have done all along)

@benjyw benjyw removed this from the 2.21.x milestone Oct 30, 2024
@benjyw
Copy link
Contributor Author

benjyw commented Oct 30, 2024

I will add a README to my patch, so we know how to build the .js in the future.

Also, I have submitted this as a PR upstream, which would be even better: Swatinem/rust-cache#216

@benjyw benjyw merged commit a48ba7e into pantsbuild:main Oct 30, 2024
24 checks passed
@benjyw benjyw deleted the fix_rust_cache_reference branch October 30, 2024 00:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category:internal CI, fixes for not-yet-released features, etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants