Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RawTypes no longer flags implicit raw types from lambdas #2119

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 18, 2022

Conversation

carterkozak
Copy link
Contributor

See the confusing failures with no source location on
palantir/tritium#1392 due to
assertions on Gauge values.

==COMMIT_MSG==
RawTypes no longer flags implicit raw types from lambdas
==COMMIT_MSG==

See the confusing failures with no source location on
palantir/tritium#1392 due to
assertions on Gauge values.
@changelog-app
Copy link

changelog-app bot commented Mar 18, 2022

Generate changelog in changelog/@unreleased

Type

  • Feature
  • Improvement
  • Fix
  • Break
  • Deprecation
  • Manual task
  • Migration

Description

RawTypes no longer flags implicit raw types from lambdas

Check the box to generate changelog(s)

  • Generate changelog entry

@carterkozak carterkozak requested review from fawind and xRuiAlves March 18, 2022 16:02
@bulldozer-bot bulldozer-bot bot merged commit c94b9e0 into develop Mar 18, 2022
@bulldozer-bot bulldozer-bot bot deleted the ckozak/implicit_raw_types branch March 18, 2022 16:25
@svc-autorelease
Copy link
Collaborator

Released 4.77.0

bulldozer-bot bot pushed a commit to palantir/witchcraft-api that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
###### _excavator_ is a bot for automating changes across repositories.

Changes produced by the roomba/latest-baseline-oss check.

# Release Notes
## 4.77.0
| Type | Description | Link |
| ---- | ----------- | ---- |
| Fix | RawTypes no longer flags implicit raw types from lambdas | palantir/gradle-baseline#2119 |



To enable or disable this check, please contact the maintainers of Excavator.
This was referenced Mar 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants