V20: Scoping Issue

[p0mvn]

Background

Tentative plan for the v20 scope. Each effort is to have a design document created. Upon reviewing and accepting the design, the final decision about v20 inclusion will be made.

Need Decision

Issues that were requested and need scope decisions

Tasks

Beta Give feedback

No tasks being tracked yet.

In-Scope

The scope that is currently planned for v20

Tasks

Beta Give feedback

1. feat: add message for transferring CL position ownership #6541
   C:x/concentrated-liquidity T:triage +2
   
2. Volume Splitting Incentives Tracking Issue #6057
   39 of 39
   F: volume-splitting T:task ⚙️ +2
   

   
3. lockup: Allow rebonding of unbonding tokens #4713
   C:CLI C:x/epochs C:x/lockup V:state/breaking +4
   
4. fix: unbond and stake serialization issues #6330
   C:x/superfluid T:bug 🐛 +2
5. feat: whitelist for accounts that can create pools for non-whitelisted quote assets #6345
   F: concentrated-liquidity +1
   
6. v20: Remove OSMO 2 hop route discount #6373
   +0
   
7. IBC minor version bump for penumbra support? #6482
   +0
   
8. Fix: Fix valset pref unbonding bugs #5967
   A:backport/v20.x C:CLI C:docs V:state/breaking +4
   
9. Finish ValSet Pref Unbonding #6630
   A:no-changelog C:docs V:state/compatible/no_backport +3
   
10. IBC version bump https://github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/releases/tag/v4.5.0
11. Taker fee bypass
12. refactor(osmomath): limit pow iterations in osmomath #6627
    C:x/gamm V:state/breaking +2
13. State-exported mainnet volume-splitting test #6645
    +0
    

Non-Blocking

Efforts below will be added to the scope if they are complete prior to the current scope being complete.

Tasks

Beta Give feedback

1. [Epic] Lower Min Spot Price in CL to 10^-30 #5726
   16 of 30
   ClickUp Test F: concentrated-liquidity T:epic ⛰ +3
   
2. Exclude null address from supply queries (Proposal 551) #5606
   +0
3. Issue in PFM prevents clearing of IBC channels #5969
   +0
4. [CL]: Add query for getting underlying assets for unit of liquidity #6340
   +0
   

Not Pursuing

Efforts below are not being pursuit this release.

Tasks

Beta Give feedback

1. [Feature]: Option 1: Add After Send Hooks to TokenFactory #6390
   +0
2. [Feature]: Option 2: Add message as argument to TokenFactory send hooks #6389
   +0
   
3. [Feature]: Add hooks from staking module to keep live delegations synchronized with valsetprefs #6544
   T:triage +1

Concurrent To v20

Efforts being pursued concurrently but independently of v20 release

Tasks

Beta Give feedback

1. feat: Single-asset CL join contract for Skip/Quasar #6255
   +0
   
2. Account Abstraction #5736
   +0
   
3. Node Stability Improvements #5737
   +0
   
4. [EPIC] On-chain IBC routing #4344
   10 of 15
   F: Crosschain Swaps T:epic ⛰ +2
   

Deprioritized

Issues below were in-scope at some point but were moved out due to a lack of clarity on product priorities.

Tasks

Beta Give feedback

1. Force undelegate superfluid staking position by whitelisted address #5861
   C:docs C:x/superfluid Stale V:state/breaking +4
2. feat: governance gated permissioning system that allows breaking locks #5630
   +0
   
3. Add param to allow non lock owner to force unlock #4252
   C:x/lockup Stale +2
4. feat: AfterCosmWasmPoolCreated hook to create an internal gauge #6122
   F: CosmWasmPool Help wanted +2

[faddat]

I made a branch for v18, it started with the lint for tests pr because having that in makes the upgrade easier / safer:

• https://github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/tree/osmosis-v18-target

Actually, as long as this is reasonable to you, I realized today that it's probably possible to make a good deal of progress even in parallel with 17, so I created a target branch and I'm going to make pull requests towards that.

I'm currently working on the first PR which basically just makes sure that everything can tidy. In other upgrades that I've done, this PR tends to be really large because it's very challenging to do an upgrade of part of the code.

• deps: upgrade to sdk v0.50.x #5952

Dependencies that need upgrading:

• packet forward middleware
• Osmosis wasmd
  • use latest ibc CosmWasm/wasmd#1534 - updating to use the same ibc-go and sdk as this branch....
• IBC (this is complete enough to begin with)
  • deps: bump cosmos-sdk in v50 branch cosmos/ibc-go#4274

[p0mvn]

Cross-posting from Slack:

Hi Jacob.

Thanks for the context.

This is my first day back from vacation so I don't have the most up-to-date context on the plans for the unfork. Will share my latest state below and get back with updates once I have them.

The current plan is to focus on releasing v17 with immediate concentrated liquidity fixes and improvements.
Only after that, we will dedicate capacity on writing up a design document with plans for the unfork, including how it will relate to all the dependencies.

As part of concentrated liquidity learnings, we would like to avoid using feature branches due to branch synching overhead. So if you are able to start some smaller incremental work, please do it to main as opposed to long-lasting feature branches.
Additionally, we now have a requirement to create a document outlining all known context and development plan before starting on the actual implementation of a large feature. The reason why this is especially important for unfork is because we will need to figure out how to deal with some of the custom functionality on our fork. For SDK unfork, Adam, Nicolas and I will be working on it after v17 is out. Once it's ready, we are hoping to collaborate on the implementation with anyone interested.
That being said, if you can drive forward some of the dependency upgrades in the meantime such as wasmd etc, so that they are compatible with sdk 0.50, that would be excellent.

AFAIR, the only reason we use our custom wasmd is because we have some custom SDK fork APIs that prevent us from using the upstream. Will need to confirm this. Ideally, we should stop using Osmosis fork for wasmd as well after unforking SDK

[p0mvn]

Linking context from #ext-cosmos-tech: https://osmosis-network.slack.com/archives/C047X1T6ERK/p1692022598220689