Bug 1986003: Rebase to Kubernetes 1.22

[coreydaley]

No description provided.

[coreydaley]

/test all

[coreydaley]

/test e2e-aws

[coreydaley]

/retest
infrastructure issue

 level=info msg=Creating infrastructure resources...
level=error
level=error msg=Error: Error retrieving Target Group Attributes: TargetGroupNotFound: Target groups 'arn:aws:elasticloadbalancing:us-east-1:460538899914:targetgroup/ci-op-hnblpriv-f242d-6lbct-aext/e60484d43df1dee3' not found
level=error msg=	status code: 400, request id: 009de565-1fd9-4bd4-a38f-900cef790770
level=error
level=error msg=  on ../tmp/openshift-install-cluster-034962729/vpc/master-elb.tf line 71, in resource "aws_lb_target_group" "api_external":
level=error msg=  71: resource "aws_lb_target_group" "api_external" {
level=error
level=error
level=fatal msg=failed to fetch Cluster: failed to generate asset "Cluster": failed to create cluster: failed to apply Terraform: failed to complete the change 

[coreydaley]

/retest
unrelated test failure/flake

[coreydaley]

/retest
infrastructure issues

level=error
level=error msg=Error: Error retrieving Target Group Attributes: TargetGroupNotFound: Target groups 'arn:aws:elasticloadbalancing:us-east-1:460538899914:targetgroup/ci-op-hnblpriv-f242d-6lbct-aext/e60484d43df1dee3' not found
level=error msg=	status code: 400, request id: 009de565-1fd9-4bd4-a38f-900cef790770
level=error
level=error msg=  on ../tmp/openshift-install-cluster-034962729/vpc/master-elb.tf line 71, in resource "aws_lb_target_group" "api_external":
level=error msg=  71: resource "aws_lb_target_group" "api_external" {
level=error
level=error
level=fatal msg=failed to fetch Cluster: failed to generate asset "Cluster": failed to create cluster: failed to apply Terraform: failed to complete the change 

[coreydaley]

/retest

[coreydaley]

/retest

[coreydaley]

/retest

[coreydaley]

/assign @adambkaplan @gabemontero

[coreydaley]

/retest

[gabemontero]

well the most recent e2e-aws-image-ecosystem failure turned up an issue with the recent fix to shorten the connection timeout ... broke the retry mechanism

that fix merged 9 days ago, so it must not be frequent (I saw evidence of networking pain in various logs) but I'll be opening a new BZ for this in a few minutes and have a PR up shortly after

the cgroupsv2 e2e needs my BUILD-278 PR in this repo ... that optional job should be skipped

but I won't issue the skip yet so we can

/test e2e-aws-image-ecosystem

/lgtm

[gabemontero]

openshift/cluster-samples-operator#386 up for fixing retry on tbr check

[gabemontero]

the image eco suite failed, but if you look at the results, the actual tests passed, but an error occurred during must gather

/test e2e-aws-image-ecosystem

[gabemontero]

/test e2e-aws-image-ecosystem

[coreydaley]

/retest

[gabemontero]

yeah that cgroupv2 won't pass until BUILD-278 merges @coreydaley

I just wanted to see a clean image eco (that latest failures have been non samples flakes) before officially invoking a skip to clear out the cgroupv2 e2e

[openshift-ci]

@coreydaley: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-cgroupsv2	af83e25	link	/test e2e-aws-cgroupsv2

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[gabemontero]

ok we have a green image eco

going to

/skip

to clear out the cgroupv2 test .... it will be covered by BUILD-278 which should cover cgroupv2 and k8s v1.22 after this PR merges.

[coreydaley]

Thanks @gabemontero
Looks like i still need an approval from @adambkaplan

[adambkaplan]

/lgtm

[adambkaplan]

/label docs-approved

No documentation required for this

[adambkaplan]

/label px-approved

No PX materials required for this

[adambkaplan]

/assign @jitendar-singh

I think the CI test for this PR is sufficient. If you agree you can label this "qe-approved" and this can merge.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: adambkaplan, coreydaley, gabemontero

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [adambkaplan]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[coreydaley]

/retitle Bug 1986003: Rebase to Kubernetes 1.22

[openshift-ci]

@coreydaley: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1986003, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1986003: Rebase to Kubernetes 1.22

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[coreydaley]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci]

@coreydaley: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1986003, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[coreydaley]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci]

@coreydaley: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1986003, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @wangke19

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@coreydaley: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/api#973
• openshift/apiserver-library-go#57
• openshift/builder#262
• openshift/client-go#188
• openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator#1181
• openshift/cluster-kube-controller-manager-operator#550
• openshift/cluster-kube-descheduler-operator#204
• openshift/cluster-kube-scheduler-operator#362
• openshift/cluster-openshift-controller-manager-operator#225
• openshift/kubernetes#862
• openshift/library-go#1137
• openshift/oc#890

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

• openshift/openshift-controller-manager#195 is open

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Bugzilla bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Bugzilla bug 1986003 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1986003: Rebase to Kubernetes 1.22

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[jitendar-singh]

/qe-approved