-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: Jabberwocky: an ontology-aware toolkit for manipulating text #2140
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
|
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Thanks! Previously I submitted Jabberwocky with a single command, which allowed users to retrieve key elements from a text corpus using an ontology’s terms. Jabberwocky is the first tool to use an ontology directly. However, I understand the feedback that Jabberwocky was a minor-utility package and so I significantly expanded to include more functionality that demonstrates its utility in developing and maintaining ontologies, as well as querying text. This updated version of Jabberwocky includes two new subcommands, which together combine to make a workflow for users. Jabberwocky can now perform a tf-idf analysis on textual data to select key terms, and annotate those key terms in the ontology. Users can iteratively use these commands to identify and incrementally add new synonyms to expand their ontology. |
Dear authors and reviewers We wanted to notify you that in light of the current COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS has decided to suspend submission of new manuscripts and to handle existing manuscripts (such as this one) on a "best efforts basis". We understand that you may need to attend to more pressing issues than completing a review or updating a repository in response to a review. If this is the case, a quick note indicating that you need to put a "pause" on your involvement with a review would be appreciated but is not required. Thanks in advance for your understanding. Arfon Smith, Editor in Chief, on behalf of the JOSS editorial team. |
@majensen has been invited to edit this submission. |
OK, the editor is @majensen |
@wdduncan -- would you be willing to review this software for JOSS? Information about reviewing is available here. Please let me know here or via other channels - thanks for considering! --@majensen |
@majensen |
@majensen |
@wdduncan great thought- will give it a shot |
OK, @wdduncan is now a reviewer |
@cmungall - would you have time and inclination to review this software for JOSS? Reviewing information is available here. Let me know here or at maj.fortinbras@gmail.com if you have any questions. Thanks for considering! --@majensen |
Other people you might consider: Jim Balhoff - balhoff |
@balhoff - would you have time and inclination to review this software for JOSS? Reviewing information is available here. Let me know here or at maj.fortinbras@gmail.com if you have any questions. Thanks for considering! --@majensen |
To all - JOSS is operating under a very relaxed schedule during these days of COVID-19. @sap218, @wdduncan , please just drop a note here if you need to pause the review process to attend to more pressing matters. |
@majensen I can review. I like the idea of a relaxed schedule—I may not be able to begin this week. |
@majensen |
OK, @balhoff is now a reviewer |
Ok everyone - we're are dialed in for a review. I will create that now- this issue will close and we'll continue the discussion in the new one. |
@whedon start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #2168. |
Review @ #2168 |
Submitting author: @sap218 (Samantha Pendleton)
Repository: https://github.com/sap218/jabberwocky
Version: v0.5.0.1
Editor: @majensen
Reviewers: @wdduncan, @balhoff
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @sap218. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@sap218 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: