Skip to content

Conversation

GoeLin
Copy link
Member

@GoeLin GoeLin commented Oct 5, 2025

I backport this to simplify later changes.

Backport is based on push to 21.
Skipped some more files, needed further resolves:

test/jdk/tools/jpackage/linux/ReleaseTest.java
Resolved @test block

test/jdk/tools/jpackage/macosx/SigningAppImageTest.java
test/jdk/tools/jpackage/macosx/SigningPackageTest.java
Copyright

test/jdk/tools/jpackage/share/AddLauncherTest.java
Resolved @test block

test/jdk/tools/jpackage/share/AppImagePackageTest.java
Copyright

test/jdk/tools/jpackage/share/IconTest.java
Resolved @test block

test/jdk/tools/jpackage/share/LicenseTest.java
Copyright

test/jdk/tools/jpackage/share/MultiLauncherTwoPhaseTest.java
Resolved @test block


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • JDK-8343314 needs maintainer approval
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8343314: Move common properties from jpackage jtreg test declarations to TEST.properties file (Enhancement - P4 - Requested)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4016/head:pull/4016
$ git checkout pull/4016

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4016
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4016/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4016

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4016

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4016.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 5, 2025

👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 5, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title backport e1b5f3c56d02c6738726106d3d069fea7a633245 8343314: Move common properties from jpackage jtreg test declarations to TEST.properties file Oct 5, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 5, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 5, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 5, 2025

Webrevs

@GoeLin GoeLin force-pushed the goetz_backport_8343314 branch from 255253c to d71a1c2 Compare October 5, 2025 19:03
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 5, 2025

@GoeLin Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information.

Copy link
Contributor

@schmelter-sap schmelter-sap left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 9, 2025

⚠️ @GoeLin This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Oct 9, 2025

Thanks for the review!

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received label Oct 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants