Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update CH bond parameter and README #83

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 9, 2018
Merged

Update CH bond parameter and README #83

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 9, 2018

Conversation

bannanc
Copy link
Collaborator

@bannanc bannanc commented Nov 7, 2018

This PR fixes the sp carbon-hydrogen bond parameter discussed in issue #81.
I also updated the README per issue #82 including updating the zendo badge to link to version 1.0.7.

@bannanc bannanc requested a review from davidlmobley November 7, 2018 20:23
@bannanc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bannanc commented Nov 7, 2018

This isn't in a pull request, but I also set the master branch to be protected requiring at least one review before PRs can be merged. I didn't include administrators so we can override the requirement if the situation requires it.

Additionally, with ParmEd, it should be possible to convert parameterized OpenMM systems into other formats such as AMBER, CHARMM, or GROMACS, making this forcefield available in a variety of packages.

**However**, some development/testing remains to be done on `smarty.forcefield` before this should be applied widely.
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@davidlmobley I wasn't sure if we still wanted this disclaimer, I'm happy to put it back in with a link to the openforcefield issue tracker.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can remove.

Copy link
Collaborator

@davidlmobley davidlmobley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a minor suggestion relating to the paper reference; after that it should be good to go.

(For bonus points, add a link to openforcefield.org, which is now useful.)

README.md Outdated
This provides the first general-purpose implementation of a SMIRKS Native Open Force Field (SMIRNOFF) as implemented by
the [openforcefield](https://github.com/openforcefield/openforcefield) toolkit and its
its ForceField class for parameterizing small molecules for OpenMM.
Details about this new format are documented in our recent preprint ([doi:10.1101/286542](https://doi.org/10.1101/286542)).
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The paper is out; do you mind updating to give the reference/link to the paper?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@davidlmobley I had intentionally used the rxiv since anyone can download it. I'll update with the JCTC link, but I thought I would comment for the record.

Additionally, with ParmEd, it should be possible to convert parameterized OpenMM systems into other formats such as AMBER, CHARMM, or GROMACS, making this forcefield available in a variety of packages.

**However**, some development/testing remains to be done on `smarty.forcefield` before this should be applied widely.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can remove.

@bannanc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bannanc commented Nov 9, 2018

@davidlmobley I updated the README, per your review, could you double check and merge?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants