Update api version for internal apis to v1alpha1

[VaishnaviHire]

Description

This PR introduces following changes:

• API versions updated to v1alpha1
• Updated apigroup for components and services to *.platform.opendatahub.io

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshot or short clip

Merge criteria

• You have read the contributors guide.
• Commit messages are meaningful - have a clear and concise summary and detailed explanation of what was changed and why.
• Pull Request contains a description of the solution, a link to the JIRA issue, and to any dependent or related Pull Request.
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from vaishnavihire. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[VaishnaviHire]

@lburgazzoli @zdtsw @ykaliuta Addressed comments from #1411

[lburgazzoli]

wonder if we want to have an additional level i.e components.platform.opendatahub.io, services.platform.opendatahub.io, and so on.

no strong opinion though

[zdtsw]

so we might have different version on component and service later? v1alpha1 v1beta10

[lburgazzoli]

Mainly for discovering:

to know what components are shipped as part of the platform:

kubectl api-resources --api-group components.platform.opendatahub.io

to know what services are shipped as part of the platform:

kubectl api-resources --api-group services.platform.opendatahub.io

etc

[VaishnaviHire]

Yeah we probably can have different versions. And yes I remember we wanted to have easy discovery, so having this 2 groups makes sense.

[VaishnaviHire]

/test opendatahub-operator-e2e

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 11.11111% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (feature-operator-refactor@2aff8dc). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...atasciencecluster/datasciencecluster_controller.go	0.00%	14 Missing ⚠️
pkg/controller/reconciler/reconciler.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
pkg/controller/reconciler/reconciler_support.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                     Coverage Diff                      @@
##             feature-operator-refactor    #1416   +/-   ##
============================================================
  Coverage                             ?   26.84%           
============================================================
  Files                                ?       65           
  Lines                                ?     5160           
  Branches                             ?        0           
============================================================
  Hits                                 ?     1385           
  Misses                               ?     3613           
  Partials                             ?      162           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[zdtsw]

LGTM

[lburgazzoli]

/lgtm