Fix: Overflow for switchers in sidebar, Avatar size in notes tab, Textbox expansion in Add Facility #10005
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Rishith25 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 57 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces localization updates and UI improvements across multiple components. The changes focus on adding internationalization support to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Rishith25
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/components/Common/Avatar.tsx (2)
69-69: Consider adding size constraints for consistency.Removing
h-full w-fullwhile keeping onlyaspect-square object-covermight lead to inconsistent avatar sizes. The image will maintain its aspect ratio but could expand beyond intended bounds.Consider adding specific size classes or ensuring parent components provide proper constraints:
- className="aspect-square object-cover" + className="aspect-square object-cover max-w-full max-h-full"
77-77: Add viewBox-based sizing for SVG fallback.The SVG fallback uses the same className changes as the image, but SVGs might need more explicit sizing control to maintain consistency with image avatars.
Consider preserving the viewBox proportions:
- className="aspect-square object-cover" + className="aspect-square object-cover w-full h-full" + preserveAspectRatio="xMidYMid meet"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/components/Common/Avatar.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Facility/CreateFacilityForm.tsx(0 hunks)src/components/ui/sidebar/facility-switcher.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/ui/sidebar/organization-switcher.tsx(5 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/components/Facility/CreateFacilityForm.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- src/components/ui/sidebar/organization-switcher.tsx
- src/components/ui/sidebar/facility-switcher.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Check linked issues
- GitHub Check: cypress-run (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/Common/Avatar.tsx (1)
60-60: Verify sizing behavior with flex layout.The removal of explicit size classes (
w-full h-full) in favor of flex layout could affect how the avatar sizes within its parent container. Ensure this change aligns with the PR's goal of reducing avatar size.Run this script to find avatar usage patterns:
✅ Verification successful
Avatar sizing is properly controlled through explicit size classes.
The removal of
w-full h-fullclasses in favor of flex layout is safe as all avatar instances across the codebase use explicit size classes (e.g.,h-6 w-6,h-12 w-12) to control their dimensions. The new flex layout only improves content centering without affecting the sizing behavior.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find avatar size definitions in parent components rg -l 'Avatar' | xargs rg -A 3 -B 3 'className.*(?i)(width|height|size|w-\d+|h-\d+)'Length of output: 108420
Rishith25
changed the title
Rishith25
changed the title
|
@Rishith25 Your efforts have helped advance digital healthcare and TeleICU systems. 🚀 Thank you for taking the time out to make CARE better. We hope you continue to innovate and contribute; your impact is immense! 🙌 |
|
@Jacobjeevan @rithviknishad Can you assign story points for this |
Proposed Changes
@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers
Merge Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
Localization
UI Improvements
User Experience