Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bound MDX version on all packages #710

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

talex5
Copy link
Collaborator

@talex5 talex5 commented Mar 10, 2024

#706 only added the bound in one place, but when releasing it's needed on all packages.

@talex5 talex5 changed the title Bound MDX version on all packages. Bound MDX version on all packages Mar 10, 2024
@talex5 talex5 merged commit 15f2047 into ocaml-multicore:main Mar 11, 2024
5 checks passed
@talex5 talex5 deleted the mdx branch March 11, 2024 12:49
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
(depends
(alcotest (and (>= 1.7.0) :with-test))
(eio (= :version))
(mdx (and (>= 2.2.0) :with-test))
(mdx (and (>= 2.2.0) (< 2.4.0) :with-test))

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any reason why <2.4.0 specifically? Is there a breaking change in 2.4.0?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2.4.0 started executing code while copying it. Looks like 2.4.1 has reverted this change (https://github.com/realworldocaml/mdx/releases/tag/2.4.1).

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, got it. I guess in the future >2.4.0 <3.0.0 would also work, if they agree to stick to a semantic versioning logic.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've updated it to 2.4.1 in #712.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants