Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Follow up to #753. Explicitly cast config to regconfig. #838

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2019

Conversation

rwasef1830
Copy link
Contributor

Follow up to #753
CC @austindrenski @CornedBee

@austindrenski
Copy link
Contributor

@rwasef1830 Can you rebase to pick up 0d99ac5?

@rwasef1830 rwasef1830 force-pushed the regconfig-explicit-cast-followup branch from ecdc6a9 to eb20a9e Compare March 1, 2019 17:13
@rwasef1830
Copy link
Contributor Author

@austindrenski done.

@rwasef1830
Copy link
Contributor Author

So, should I just rebase and merge this ? @roji @austindrenski @YohDeadfall

Copy link
Contributor

@YohDeadfall YohDeadfall left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, but let's wait for @roji.

Copy link
Member

@roji roji left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for taking so long with this.

@smitpatel (and others), this is a somewhat interesting case where the type inference planned for 3.0 could be helpful. Rather than an explicit SQL cast, the full text functions would be known to accept the regconfig type, and the correct type mapping will be automatically selected.

@rwasef1830 rwasef1830 force-pushed the regconfig-explicit-cast-followup branch from eb20a9e to 7bdc0c4 Compare March 14, 2019 19:27
@rwasef1830 rwasef1830 merged commit 576e1db into npgsql:dev Mar 14, 2019
@rwasef1830 rwasef1830 deleted the regconfig-explicit-cast-followup branch March 14, 2019 19:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants