Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Finish conversion to .NET Core #4

Closed
jrbriggs opened this issue Aug 8, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Finish conversion to .NET Core #4

jrbriggs opened this issue Aug 8, 2019 · 4 comments
Assignees
@mjcheetham
Labels
engineering

Comments

@jrbriggs
Copy link
Member

jrbriggs commented Aug 8, 2019

We'll fully embrace the new project model and drop remaining support for .NET Framework.
@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-activity Stale issue or PR that will be automatically closed soon. label Aug 16, 2019
@derrickstolee derrickstolee removed the no-activity Stale issue or PR that will be automatically closed soon. label Aug 16, 2019
@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-activity Stale issue or PR that will be automatically closed soon. label Aug 17, 2019
@jrbriggs jrbriggs removed the no-activity Stale issue or PR that will be automatically closed soon. label Aug 17, 2019
@microsoft microsoft deleted a comment from github-actions bot Aug 21, 2019
@microsoft microsoft deleted a comment from github-actions bot Aug 21, 2019
@mjcheetham
Copy link
Member

FYI, looks like .NET Core 3.0 preview 7 has a 'go live' licence too...

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/announcing-net-core-3-0-preview-7

@github-actions
Copy link

Labeling this issue as stale. There has been no activity for 30 days. Remove stale label or comment or this issue will be closed in 7 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-activity Stale issue or PR that will be automatically closed soon. label Sep 20, 2019
@mjcheetham mjcheetham removed the no-activity Stale issue or PR that will be automatically closed soon. label Sep 23, 2019
@derrickstolee derrickstolee mentioned this issue Oct 3, 2019
Merged
derrickstolee added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 4, 2019
@derrickstolee
Merge pull request #122: Use GVFS Helper transport instead of read ob…
a8b0b08 
…ject hook

See microsoft/git#191 for the Git code regarding the GVFS transport layer. This can work in tandem with the read-object hook, but it _should_ make the read-object hook irrelevant.

* Delete all references to the read-object hook in the product code. This unblocks #4 and the [Mount Removal] tasks #15,  #132, #133, #135, #136, and possible others.

* Delete the Sparse Verb in favor of `git sparse-checkout set`.

* Delete the `BlobPrefetcher` and all references to `--files` or `--folders` prefetching.

Resolves #6, #7, #36.
@wilbaker wilbaker mentioned this issue Oct 4, 2019
Closed
@github-actions
Copy link

Labeling this issue as stale. There has been no activity for 30 days. Remove stale label or comment or this issue will be closed in 7 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-activity Stale issue or PR that will be automatically closed soon. label Oct 23, 2019
@mjcheetham mjcheetham removed the no-activity Stale issue or PR that will be automatically closed soon. label Oct 28, 2019
@derrickstolee
Copy link
Contributor

Looks done as of #201.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mjcheetham mjcheetham

Labels
engineering
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@derrickstolee @jrbriggs @mjcheetham