-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 139
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Tegra, Jetpack 5: add Jetson as working target #394
fix: Tegra, Jetpack 5: add Jetson as working target #394
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Marius Westgaard <marius.westgaard@1x.tech>
Signed-off-by: Marius Westgaard <marius.westgaard@1x.tech>
Signed-off-by: Marius Westgaard <marius.westgaard@1x.tech>
…A partition will be flashed with the appropriate image Signed-off-by: Iban Rodriguez <irodriguez@das-gate.com>
Signed-off-by: Iban Rodriguez <irodriguez@das-gate.com>
Signed-off-by: Marius Westgaard <marius.westgaard@1x.tech>
Signed-off-by: Marius Westgaard <marius.westgaard@1x.tech>
Signed-off-by: Iban Rodriguez <irodriguez@das-gate.com>
Signed-off-by: Carlo Kretzschmann <kretzschmann@3dvisionlabs.com>
When a rollback was started before rebooting the update capsule was still installed on the next reboot and the boot chain was switched. We want to stay on the current chain after a failed install though. Signed-off-by: Carlo Kretzschmann <kretzschmann@3dvisionlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Iban Rodriguez <irodriguez@das-gate.com>
Signed-off-by: Marius Westgaard <marius.westgaard@1x.tech>
Signed-off-by: Marius Westgaard <marius.westgaard@1x.tech>
Signed-off-by: Marius Westgaard <marius.westgaard@1x.tech>
…n tegra194 is target Signed-off-by: Marius Westgaard <marius.westgaard@1x.tech>
Signed-off-by: Iban Rodriguez <irodriguez@veridas.com>
Signed-off-by: Iban Rodriguez <irodriguez@veridas.com>
…vier Signed-off-by: Iban Rodriguez <irodriguez@veridas.com>
Signed-off-by: Carlo Kretzschmann <kretzschmann@3dvisionlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Carlo Kretzschmann <kretzschmann@3dvisionlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Marius Westgaard <marius.westgaard@1x.tech>
Signed-off-by: Marius Westgaard <marius.westgaard@1x.tech>
Signed-off-by: Marius Westgaard <marius.westgaard@1x.tech>
Signed-off-by: Carlo Kretzschmann <kretzschmann@3dvisionlabs.com> (cherry picked from commit 1e73876)
Signed-off-by: Marius Westgaard <marius.westgaard@1x.tech> (cherry picked from commit 4d49299)
The mentioned known good boards in the README file do not have corresponding links on the Mender Hub. To avoid confusion, remove the sentence suggesting to visit those non-existing links. Signed-off-by: Josef Holzmayr <jester@theyoctojester.info>
Signed-off-by: Josef Holzmayr <jester@theyoctojester.info>
5c78da8
to
34b9448
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@TheYoctoJester looks good to me!
Thanks @TheYoctoJester, yes please set me as reported by on fa468f5. I’m on vacation right now. |
Works for me, thanks! |
Reported-by: Max Ekman <max.ekman@einride.tech> Signed-off-by: Josef Holzmayr <jester@theyoctojester.info>
|
||
FILESEXTRAPATHS:prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:" | ||
|
||
SRC_URI += "file://0007-runtime-access-for-KernelCommandLine-efivar.patch;patchdir=.." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for being late to the party. I hope, you don't mind me posting my question here.
I figured that mender uses the KernelCommandLine variable for passing the machine ID to the "new" RootFS if the feature "mender-persist-systemd-machine-id" is active.
Is this feature supposed to work despite removing this patch?
Upstream, the variable is still not available to runtime:
https://github.com/NVIDIA/edk2-nvidia/blob/r36.4.0/Silicon/NVIDIA/Drivers/NvidiaConfigDxe/NvidiaConfigHii.vfr#L63
Without runtime access to this variable, the script efi_systemd_machine_id.sh
seems to fail persisting the machine ID with the message
efivar: Read-only file system
(I tested the script on a Jetpack 6.1 system, but I don't see a relevant difference to JP 5 code)
This PR is a rebased replica of OE4T#19.
It carries the last state as of OE4T#19 (comment) comment, with the following additions: