[Backport] Remove all marketing get params on Varnish to minimize the cache objects

[ihor-sviziev]

Original Pull Request

#21818

Description (*)

Right now the same page with different UTM, mailchimp, other marketing params is NOT cached. It leads to higher load than expected.
This PR removes marketing get params from URL, as result - increased returned results from cache -> Lower load on servers.

Related: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45298422/seo-and-stripping-utm-parameters-with-varnish

Fixed Issues (if relevant)

N/A

Manual testing scenarios (*)

1. Go to URL: http://magento2.local/?utm_campaign=campaign1 (FPC should be MISS)
2. Go to URL: http://magento2.local/?utm_campaign=campaign1 (FPC should be HIT)
3. Go to URL: http://magento2.local/?utm_campaign=campaign2 (FPC should be HIT)

Contribution checklist (*)

• Pull request has a meaningful description of its purpose
• All commits are accompanied by meaningful commit messages
• All new or changed code is covered with unit/integration tests (if applicable)
• All automated tests passed successfully (all builds on Travis CI are green)

[magento-engcom-team]

Hi @ihor-sviziev. Thank you for your contribution
Here is some useful tips how you can test your changes using Magento test environment.
Add the comment under your pull request to deploy test or vanilla Magento instance:

• @magento-engcom-team give me test instance - deploy test instance based on PR changes
• @magento-engcom-team give me 2.2-develop instance - deploy vanilla Magento instance

For more details, please, review the Magento Contributor Assistant documentation

[magento-engcom-team]

Hi @josefbehr, thank you for the review.
ENGCOM-4568 has been created to process this Pull Request

[VasylShvorak]

✔️ QA passed

[sivaschenko]

@ihor-sviziev @josefbehr I will put this pull request on hold, let's review it after the original pull request is merged (as code can be updated during processing activities)

[lfluvisotto]

@ihor-sviziev how about also add fbclid (facebook parameter) in a new pull request ?

[ihor-sviziev]

Hi @lfluvisotto,
Good idea, but as it’s backport - better to keep changes the same as were merged to 2.3- develop branch.

Could you create PR with changes you suggested?

[lfluvisotto]

@ihor-sviziev please check it #22226

[m2-assistant]

Hi @ihor-sviziev, thank you for your contribution!
Please, complete Contribution Survey, it will take less than a minute.
Your feedback will help us to improve contribution process.