-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
re-enable all node flaky test, move node performance test to new job #23147
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ periodics: | |
- --deployment=node | ||
- --gcp-project-type=node-e2e-project | ||
- --gcp-zone=us-west1-b | ||
- --node-args=--image-config-file=/workspace/test-infra/jobs/e2e_node/perf-image-config.yaml | ||
- --node-args=--image-config-file=/workspace/test-infra/jobs/e2e_node/image-config.yaml | ||
- --node-test-args= --kubelet-flags="--cgroups-per-qos=true --cgroup-root=/" --server-start-timeout=420s | ||
- --node-tests=true | ||
- --provider=gce | ||
|
@@ -531,3 +531,33 @@ periodics: | |
testgrid-tab-name: kubelet-gce-e2e-swap-fedora | ||
testgrid-alert-email: ehashman@redhat.com, ikema@google.com | ||
description: Executes E2E suite with swap enabled on Fedora | ||
|
||
- name: ci-kubernetes-node-kubelet-performance-test | ||
interval: 12h | ||
labels: | ||
preset-service-account: "true" | ||
preset-k8s-ssh: "true" | ||
spec: | ||
containers: | ||
- image: gcr.io/k8s-testimages/kubekins-e2e:v20210721-2b77449-master | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Updated the image; compared to previous PR |
||
args: | ||
- --repo=k8s.io/kubernetes=master | ||
- --timeout=90 | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Do these timeouts make sense? These tests are failing consistently but I don't know if that has anything to do with the runtime. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Should we not have timeouts when tests start passing to make sure that they do not take forever. I think it might be better to let them fail after a time regardless, I do not know what the correct value is though. |
||
- --root=/go/src | ||
- --scenario=kubernetes_e2e | ||
- -- | ||
- --deployment=node | ||
- --gcp-project-type=node-e2e-project | ||
- --gcp-zone=us-west1-b | ||
- --node-args=--image-config-file=/workspace/test-infra/jobs/e2e_node/perf-image-config.yaml | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. If we use the perf-image-config do we need to specify the focus below? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. No we do not, thanks for catching that. |
||
- --node-test-args= --kubelet-flags="--cgroups-per-qos=true --cgroup-root=/" --server-start-timeout=420s | ||
- --node-tests=true | ||
- --provider=gce | ||
- --test_args=--nodes=1 | ||
- --timeout=60m | ||
env: | ||
- name: GOPATH | ||
value: /go | ||
annotations: | ||
testgrid-dashboards: sig-node-kubelet | ||
testgrid-tab-name: node-performance-test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
btw, this is why perf tests were executing:
test-infra/jobs/e2e_node/perf-image-config.yaml
Lines 8 to 9 in caeaace
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh got it! thanks a lot.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is very illogical.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, the internal config pointed to
Node Performance Testing
. Something that I should have gone down a level deeper.