You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, if one runs the inmemory provider in combination with a real source (ingress/services etc), the inmemory provider crashes because it tries to insert a record into an empty zone map.
We should give users the ability to specify initial zones for the inmemory provider to insert records into, or provide a default zone (all-accepting zone) so that the run-time behaviour is more or less in line with other providers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ffledgling
added a commit
to ffledgling/external-dns
that referenced
this issue
Oct 24, 2017
- Add `--inmemory-zone flag`
- Implement `InMemoryZoneInit` function to setup initial zones for
inmemory provider
- Make "" the default zone for the inmemory provider instead of
nil/none when no initial zones are specified
- Update config/flag parsing tests to accept new flag
- Add `--inmemory-zone flag`
- Implement `InMemoryZoneInit` function to setup initial zones for
inmemory provider
- Make "" the default zone for the inmemory provider instead of
nil/none when no initial zones are specified
- Update config/flag parsing tests to accept new flag
Currently, if one runs the inmemory provider in combination with a real source (ingress/services etc), the inmemory provider crashes because it tries to insert a record into an empty zone map.
We should give users the ability to specify initial zones for the inmemory provider to insert records into, or provide a default zone (all-accepting zone) so that the run-time behaviour is more or less in line with other providers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: