Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-2.5] 🐛 fix: self hosted e2e test #5295

Conversation

k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #5288

/assign richardcase

Fix self hosted e2e test caused by disk pressure.

The self hosted e2e was failing as the control plane node was
encountering disk pressure. This caused CAPA to be evicted and the CAPA
images on the original node where deleted to reclaim disk space. When
CAPA moved back to the node the image couldn't be found.

Signed-off-by: Richard Case <richard.case@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Case <richard.case@outlook.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. label Jan 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jan 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-priority size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 21, 2025
@AndiDog
Copy link
Contributor

AndiDog commented Jan 21, 2025

/lgtm
/approve
/hold

@richardcase please unhold when you think it's fine.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AndiDog
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from richardcase. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@richardcase
Copy link
Member

Re-creating manually to look at the issue with permissions

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@richardcase: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Re-creating manually to look at the issue with permissions

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants