This repository has been archived by the owner on May 25, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 263
Fix kubemark issue & Add document for kubemark test #817
Merged
k8s-ci-robot
merged 3 commits into
kubernetes-retired:master
from
TommyLike:feature/fix_kubemark_issue
Apr 24, 2019
Merged
Fix kubemark issue & Add document for kubemark test #817
k8s-ci-robot
merged 3 commits into
kubernetes-retired:master
from
TommyLike:feature/fix_kubemark_issue
Apr 24, 2019
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
cncf-cla: yes
Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA.
label
Apr 22, 2019
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
size/M
Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
label
Apr 22, 2019
TommyLike
force-pushed
the
feature/fix_kubemark_issue
branch
from
April 22, 2019 08:11
86d8915
to
5846bf7
Compare
k8s-ci-robot
added
size/L
Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
and removed
size/M
Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
labels
Apr 22, 2019
TommyLike
force-pushed
the
feature/fix_kubemark_issue
branch
from
April 22, 2019 08:12
5846bf7
to
da1f1da
Compare
@k82cn @Rajadeepan please take a look. |
@Rajadeepan @asifdxtreme , please take a look; we need have benchmark result for each release. |
Rajadeepan
reviewed
Apr 22, 2019
@TommyLike Looks fine. |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: k82cn, TommyLike The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
approved
Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.
label
Apr 23, 2019
@k82cn @Rajadeepan need lgtm label. |
/lgtm |
kevin-wangzefeng
pushed a commit
to kevin-wangzefeng/scheduler
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 28, 2019
…kubemark_issue Fix kubemark issue & Add document for kubemark test
kevin-wangzefeng
pushed a commit
to kevin-wangzefeng/scheduler
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 28, 2019
…kubemark_issue Fix kubemark issue & Add document for kubemark test
kevin-wangzefeng
pushed a commit
to kevin-wangzefeng/scheduler
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 28, 2019
…kubemark_issue Fix kubemark issue & Add document for kubemark test
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
approved
Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.
cncf-cla: yes
Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA.
lgtm
Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
size/L
Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it:
Release note: