Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test early placement of unevaluatedItems|Properties with $ref #706

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 4, 2024

Conversation

marksparkza
Copy link
Contributor

Follows on from 8ba1c90, which produced test failures in my implementation. I had the same problem with the changes in this PR, which puts unevaluated* before $ref.

@marksparkza marksparkza requested a review from a team as a code owner November 18, 2023 22:35
@gregsdennis
Copy link
Member

Instead of reordering existing tests, should we create separate tests to cover specifically this issue? If someone else has had problems with the current ordering, you're removing their sanity tests.

@marksparkza
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fair point. I'm happy to redo as separate tests.

@marksparkza marksparkza force-pushed the unevaluated-before-ref branch from 84ef2c2 to 4a2c61e Compare November 19, 2023 08:16
Copy link
Member

@gregsdennis gregsdennis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These pass for me.

Copy link
Member

@jdesrosiers jdesrosiers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works for me

@Julian
Copy link
Member

Julian commented Jan 4, 2024

Is there anything this PR was waiting on that made it not be merged? I'm going to assume "no" and merge it given it's been sitting here and has multiple approvals.

@Julian Julian merged commit 589a085 into json-schema-org:main Jan 4, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants