Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update installer action to match the latest cli behavior #8

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 23, 2023

Conversation

LucilleH
Copy link
Contributor

@LucilleH LucilleH commented Jun 22, 2023

Summary

  • Update test version to 0.5.5
  • Update macos test to use cache for speed
  • Add new nix installation location for caching, where this logic was introduced in https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/5588/files and it uses XDG directory

@LucilleH LucilleH force-pushed the lucille--fix-cache branch 3 times, most recently from d6ecd41 to 881ec0f Compare June 22, 2023 02:15
@LucilleH LucilleH marked this pull request as ready for review June 22, 2023 02:18
@LucilleH LucilleH requested a review from Lagoja June 22, 2023 02:18
@LucilleH LucilleH force-pushed the lucille--fix-cache branch 4 times, most recently from 249d659 to c192d07 Compare June 22, 2023 02:35
@LucilleH LucilleH requested a review from loreto June 22, 2023 02:39
@LucilleH LucilleH force-pushed the lucille--fix-cache branch from c192d07 to caa9928 Compare June 22, 2023 02:44
@LucilleH
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @mdwn I will make a new release once this goes in

@mdwn
Copy link
Contributor

mdwn commented Jun 22, 2023

cc @mdwn I will make a new release once this goes in

Sorry about the fixes needed here. Thank you!

@LucilleH LucilleH enabled auto-merge June 22, 2023 17:33
@LucilleH LucilleH added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 23, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit e190e7b Jun 23, 2023
@LucilleH LucilleH deleted the lucille--fix-cache branch September 19, 2023 18:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants