Add the ability to allow users to customize status checks

[XiongKezhi]

Add the ability to allow users to customize status checks like name or disable the status checks feature.

The new added interface StatusChecksProperties share common properties between SCM implementations. Thus, the SCM implementations (like Git SCM or Branch Source SCM) can add behaviors that implement this interface to change properties of status checks.

• Add implementations
  • See Add GitHub scm source implementation for status checks properties github-checks-plugin#66

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #31 into master will decrease coverage by 6.17%.
The diff coverage is 46.15%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master      #31      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     91.20%   85.03%   -6.18%     
  Complexity       69       69              
============================================
  Files            11       12       +1     
  Lines           273      294      +21     
  Branches          6        9       +3     
============================================
+ Hits            249      250       +1     
- Misses           22       42      +20     
  Partials          2        2              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
...gins/checks/status/BuildStatusChecksPublisher.java	34.04% <45.45%> (ø)	2.00 <2.00> (?)
.../plugins/checks/status/StatusChecksProperties.java	50.00% <50.00%> (ø)	0.00 <0.00> (?)
...ins/plugins/checks/api/ChecksPublisherFactory.java	84.21% <0.00%> (-5.27%)	8.00% <0.00%> (-1.00%)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 04f5ddc...59e556e. Read the comment docs.

[XiongKezhi]

Added test for the implementation (jenkinsci/github-checks-plugin#66), not necessary here IMO.

[timja]

How does this allow users to suppress the log message when no checks api installation is in use?

[XiongKezhi]

How does this allow users to suppress the log message when no checks api installation is in use?

em... How about changing the default value of skip to be true?

[timja]

How does this allow users to suppress the log message when no checks api installation is in use?

em... How about changing the default value of skip to be true?

yeah I think that would fix it for the null publisher 👍,
as long as it doesn't skip others by default

[XiongKezhi]

I'll update the implementation guide tomorrow.