Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dunai-test: Reduce number of ways of defining past-time predicates #385

Closed
ivanperez-keera opened this issue Oct 22, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@ivanperez-keera
Copy link
Owner

ivanperez-keera commented Oct 22, 2023

The FRP.Dunai.LTLPast module provides multiple ways of defining past-time predicates.

In comparison, Yampa only had some of those commented out, and they were eventually removed: ivanperez-keera/Yampa@b0c0846

For consistency, only one way should be provided in Dunai, unless the other one can be properly justified.

@ivanperez-keera ivanperez-keera self-assigned this Oct 22, 2023
ivanperez-keera added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 22, 2023
The FRP.Dunai.LTLPast module provides multiple ways of defining
past-time predicates.

In comparison, Yampa only had those commented out, and they were
eventually removed.

This commit deprecates the way of writing past-time LTL predicates that
does not match what we have in Yampa.
ivanperez-keera added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 22, 2023
The FRP.Dunai.LTLPast module provides multiple ways of defining
past-time predicates.

In comparison, Yampa only had the second set of combinators commented
out, and they were eventually removed.

This commit deprecates the way of writing past-time LTL predicates that
does not match what we have in Yampa.
@ivanperez-keera ivanperez-keera added this to the Dunai 0.12.0 milestone Oct 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant