Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(admin): sc - lista læst tag #16494

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 21, 2024
Merged

fix(admin): sc - lista læst tag #16494

merged 6 commits into from
Oct 21, 2024

Conversation

albinagu
Copy link
Member

@albinagu albinagu commented Oct 21, 2024

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new localized message for indicating when a list is locked.
    • Enhanced the Constituency component to improve the logic for canceling collections, including new rendering conditions and a confirmation dialog.
    • Updated the List component to streamline the handling of the allowedToProcess prop for improved rendering logic.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Streamlined the removal process for candidates and lists to improve clarity and functionality.
  • Documentation

    • Updated message definitions to enhance localization capabilities.

@albinagu albinagu requested a review from a team as a code owner October 21, 2024 14:40
@albinagu albinagu added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Oct 21, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request introduce a new message definition for localization in the messages.ts file and modify the rendering logic of the Constituency component in index.tsx. The new message listLocked enhances the application's localization capabilities. The Constituency component's action card tag rendering logic has been updated to conditionally display cancellation options based on the active status of the list and user permissions, streamlining the removal process for candidates and lists. Additionally, the List component has been adjusted to simplify the handling of the allowedToProcess prop.

Changes

File Change Summary
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts Added new message listLocked with properties: id: 'admin-portal.signature-collection:listLocked', defaultMessage: 'Lista læst', description: ''.
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx Updated Constituency component to modify action card tag rendering logic, checking for allowedToProcess and list.active. Simplified candidate removal logic and expanded tag rendering for various states.
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/index.tsx Adjusted logic for allowedToProcess prop and its impact on rendering components, streamlining conditions for rendering Signees, PaperSignees, and ActionReviewComplete.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

high priority

Suggested reviewers

  • kksteini

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 62eadf0 and 7684257.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx (1)

Line range hint 60-63: Define a Props interface for the Constituency component

Currently, the props for the Constituency component are typed inline. For better reusability and adherence to TypeScript best practices, consider defining a separate interface for the props.

Apply this diff to define an interface for the props:

-export const Constituency = ({
-  allowedToProcess,
-}: {
-  allowedToProcess: boolean
-}) => {
+interface ConstituencyProps {
+  allowedToProcess: boolean
+}
+
+export const Constituency = ({ allowedToProcess }: ConstituencyProps) => {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f031834 and ce57482.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts (1 hunks)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (1)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts (1)

488-492: LGTM! The new message adheres to the existing structure.

The addition of the listLocked message is consistent with the file's purpose and follows the established pattern for message definitions. This change enhances the localization capabilities of the application.

To ensure reusability across different NextJS apps as per the coding guidelines, let's verify the usage of this new message:

✅ Verification successful

Verification Successful! The listLocked message is properly reused across the codebase.

  • Found usage in libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of the new 'listLocked' message across the codebase
rg -g '!**/messages.ts' "listLocked" ./libs

Length of output: 198

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/index.tsx (2)

97-100: LGTM: Simplified conditional rendering

The updated logic for rendering the Signees component improves readability and maintainability while maintaining the same functionality.

Consider using parentheses for better readability:

{((allowedToProcess && !list.active) || !allowedToProcess) && (
  <Signees numberOfSignatures={list.numberOfSignatures ?? 0} />
)}

Line range hint 101-106: LGTM: Improved conditional rendering structure

The updated structure for rendering PaperSignees and ActionReviewComplete components improves readability and maintains proper TypeScript usage.

For consistency with the previous change, consider using the logical AND operator instead of a block:

{allowedToProcess && (
  <>
    {!list.active && <PaperSignees listId={list.id} />}
    <ActionReviewComplete listId={list.id} listStatus={listStatus} />
  </>
)}

This change would make the conditional rendering style consistent throughout the component.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ce57482 and 2bc81b8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/index.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/index.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (2)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/index.tsx (2)

95-95: LGTM: Simplified prop passing

The direct passing of allowedToProcess to ActionExtendDeadline improves component reusability and adheres to TypeScript best practices.


Line range hint 1-124: Overall: Improved component structure and reusability

The changes in this file have significantly improved the List component:

  1. Simplified prop passing and conditional rendering logic.
  2. Enhanced reusability across different NextJS apps.
  3. Maintained proper TypeScript usage for prop types.
  4. Improved readability and maintainability.

These improvements align well with the coding guidelines for files in the libs directory, ensuring effective tree-shaking and bundling practices.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.78%. Comparing base (c8adcef) to head (7684257).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #16494   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   36.78%   36.78%           
=======================================
  Files        6845     6845           
  Lines      141749   141749           
  Branches    40381    40381           
=======================================
  Hits        52140    52140           
  Misses      89609    89609           
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.37% <ø> (ø)
application-api-files 56.86% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 41.36% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules 27.80% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
application-templates-accident-notification 29.27% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-car-recycling 3.12% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-driving-license 18.32% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-estate 12.32% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-financial-aid 15.50% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-general-petition 23.44% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-inheritance-report 6.49% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-marriage-conditions 15.17% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-mortgage-certificate 43.82% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-parental-leave 29.96% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-components 1.28% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-shell 21.36% <ø> (ø)
shared-form-fields 31.60% <ø> (ø)
web 1.81% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c8adcef...7684257. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs cdc7a53 🔗

16 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 15 Passed
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 77 no change

Test Services
This report shows up to 10 services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 2.69s 1 no change Link
application-api-files 0 0 0 12 0 5.69s 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 120 2 3m 43.74s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 123 0 2m 22.88s 1 no change Link
application-templates-accident-notification 0 0 0 148 0 18.3s 1 no change Link
application-templates-driving-license 0 0 0 13 0 15.01s 1 no change Link
application-templates-financial-aid 0 0 0 11 0 14.13s 1 no change Link
application-templates-general-petition 0 0 0 5 0 12.28s 1 no change Link
application-templates-health-insurance 0 0 0 0 0 566.45ms 1 no change Link
application-templates-mortgage-certificate 0 0 0 3 0 21.35s 1 no change Link

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 6cc38e6 into main Oct 21, 2024
78 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the admin_locked_tag branch October 21, 2024 16:08
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 22, 2024
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants