Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(portals-admin): Parliamentary collection #16142

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Sep 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

albinagu
Copy link
Member

@albinagu albinagu commented Sep 24, 2024

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a cancel button and confirmation modal for signature collection.
    • Added success and error notifications for the cancellation process.
    • Updated title for signature lists to reflect presidential elections.
    • Enhanced messages for handling paper signatures, including validation feedback.
    • Added a new component for downloading reports related to signature collection areas.
    • Introduced a new component for collecting paper signatures, with improved validation.
    • Made national ID and page number inputs mandatory in the paper signatures component.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling and feedback for invalid inputs during the signature process.

@albinagu albinagu requested a review from a team as a code owner September 24, 2024 16:21
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request enhance the signature collection functionality by introducing new message definitions for canceling signature collections and managing paper signatures. It also adds a new DownloadReports component for downloading reports related to signature collections and modifies the layout of existing components. Additionally, the title for presidential signature lists has been updated, and a previous title related to parliamentary lists has been removed.

Changes

File Change Summary
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts Added new message definitions for canceling signature collections and handling paper signatures; removed listTitle message.
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/DownloadReports/index.tsx Introduced a new DownloadReports component for downloading reports related to signature collections, utilizing localization and modal dialogs.
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/index.tsx Added a new PaperSignees component for collecting paper signatures, including input validation and error handling.
libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/ViewList/Signees/PaperSignees.tsx Updated existing PaperSignees component to require national ID and page number inputs for form submission.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

high priority

Suggested reviewers

  • kksteini
  • Toti91

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 12

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/identityAndCanSignLookup.graphql (1)

9-11: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.

The CanSign query is well-structured and aligns with the coding guidelines. It promotes reusability and uses proper type definition. To enhance clarity, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the signatureCollectionCanSignFromPaper field.

You could add a comment like this:

query CanSign($input: SignatureCollectionCanSignFromPaperInput!) {
  # Returns true if the signature collection can be signed from paper, false otherwise
  signatureCollectionCanSignFromPaper(input: $input)
}
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/index.tsx (2)

43-60: LGTM: Breadcrumbs component improves navigation

The addition of the Breadcrumbs component enhances the user experience by providing clear navigation. The implementation is well-structured and uses localization correctly.

Consider extracting the Breadcrumbs items into a separate constant or function to improve readability and maintainability. For example:

const getBreadcrumbItems = (list) => [
  {
    title: formatMessage('Yfirlit'),
    href: `/stjornbord${SignatureCollectionPaths.ParliamentaryRoot}`,
  },
  {
    title: list.area.name,
    href: `/stjornbord${SignatureCollectionPaths.ParliamentaryConstituency.replace(
      ':constituencyName',
      list.area.name,
    )}`,
  },
  { title: formatMessage(m.viewList) },
]

// Then in the JSX:
<Breadcrumbs items={getBreadcrumbItems(list)} />

This approach would make the component more readable and easier to maintain.


Line range hint 1-79: LGTM: Overall component structure is well-maintained

The List component's structure is well-preserved with the new additions integrated seamlessly. The use of Grid components for layout and consistent localization is commendable.

To improve TypeScript usage and make the component more robust, consider defining an interface for the component's props, even if it doesn't have any at the moment. This will make it easier to add props in the future if needed:

interface ListProps {}

const List: React.FC<ListProps> = () => {
  // ... component implementation
}

This change aligns with the guideline of using TypeScript for defining props and exporting types, enhancing the component's reusability across different NextJS apps.

libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/shared-components/signees/editPage.tsx (3)

24-26: LGTM: Effective use of hooks for state management and localization.

The component demonstrates good practices:

  • Utilizes the useLocale hook for localization, promoting consistency across the application.
  • Implements state management using React's useState hook.

Consider adding type annotations to the state variables for improved type safety:

const [newPage, setNewPage] = useState<number>(page)
const [modalIsOpen, setModalIsOpen] = useState<boolean>(false)

28-86: LGTM: Well-structured component with proper Modal implementation.

The component structure and Modal implementation demonstrate good practices:

  • Utilizes layout components from '@island.is/island-ui/core' for responsive design.
  • Implements Modal functionality correctly with proper open/close logic.
  • Form inputs are appropriately labeled and use localized messages.
  • Correct implementation of editable and read-only inputs.

To improve accessibility, consider adding an aria-label to the edit icon:

<Box 
  marginLeft={1} 
  onClick={() => setModalIsOpen(true)} 
  cursor="pointer"
  aria-label={formatMessage(m.editPaperNumber)}
>
  <Icon icon="pencil" type="outline" color="blue400" />
</Box>

90-90: LGTM: Correct component export.

The component is correctly exported as the default export, which is a common practice in React.

For better tree-shaking support, consider using a named export instead:

export const EditPage = ({ ... }) => { ... }

This can potentially improve bundling efficiency, especially if this file might contain multiple exports in the future.

libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/index.tsx (1)

44-53: LGTM: Breadcrumbs component implemented correctly

The Breadcrumbs component is well-implemented and enhances the navigation structure of the page. It adheres to the coding guidelines by:

  1. Supporting reusability across different NextJS apps.
  2. Using TypeScript for defining props (implicitly through the component usage).
  3. Integrating well with the existing code structure.

The use of formatMessage for the title supports localization, which is a good practice.

Consider extracting the hardcoded string 'Yfirlit' into a message constant for better maintainability and consistency with other localized strings in the file. For example:

// In the messages file
export const m = defineMessages({
  // ... other messages
  overviewBreadcrumb: {
    id: 'portal.admin.signature-collection.overview-breadcrumb',
    defaultMessage: 'Yfirlit',
  },
})

// In the component
title: formatMessage(m.overviewBreadcrumb),
libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/ViewList/Signees/index.tsx (1)

101-109: Improved layout, but indentation needs adjustment

The changes enhance the visual separation between the page number and the icon, which improves the overall layout. This is a good improvement to the user interface.

However, there's a minor issue with code formatting:

The indentation of the new Box component on line 103 is inconsistent with the surrounding code. Please adjust the indentation to match the parent Box component. Here's the suggested change:

 <Box display="flex">
   <Text>{s.pageNumber}</Text>
-  <Box marginLeft={1}>
+    <Box marginLeft={1}>
     <Icon
       icon="document"
       type="outline"
       color="blue400"
     />
   </Box>
 </Box>

This will maintain consistent indentation throughout the component, improving code readability.

libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/shared-components/signees/index.tsx (2)

20-20: LGTM! Consider grouping imports for better organization.

The import of the EditPage component adheres to TypeScript usage guidelines and promotes reusability. To enhance code organization, consider grouping this import with other local component imports.

 import { pageSize } from '../../lib/utils'
 import { m } from '../../lib/messages'
+import EditPage from './editPage'
 
-import EditPage from './editPage'

125-129: LGTM! Consider defining prop types for EditPage.

The addition of the EditPage component enhances functionality and adheres to TypeScript usage guidelines. The conditional rendering and prop passing look good.

To improve type safety and documentation, consider defining prop types for the EditPage component:

type EditPageProps = {
  page: number;
  name: string;
  nationalId: string;
};

const EditPage: React.FC<EditPageProps> = ({ page, name, nationalId }) => {
  // component implementation
};

This will provide better type checking and auto-completion when using the component.

libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts (3)

190-220: LGTM! Consider adding descriptions for new messages.

The new message definitions for canceling a collection are well-structured and consistent with the existing code. They are properly exported as part of the m object, which allows for effective tree-shaking.

Consider adding meaningful descriptions to the new messages. This can improve maintainability and provide context for translators. For example:

 cancelCollectionButton: {
   id: 'dmin-portal.signature-collection:cancelCollectionButton',
   defaultMessage: 'Hætta við söfnun meðmæla',
-  description: '',
+  description: 'Button text for canceling the signature collection',
 },

525-589: LGTM! Consider adding descriptions and fix a typo.

The new message definitions for handling paper signatures are well-structured and consistent with the existing code. They are properly exported as part of the m object, which allows for effective tree-shaking.

  1. Consider adding meaningful descriptions to the new messages. This can improve maintainability and provide context for translators. For example:
 paperSigneesHeader: {
   id: 'admin-portal.signature-collection:paperSigneesHeader',
   defaultMessage: 'Skrá meðmæli af blaði',
-  description: '',
+  description: 'Header for the section to register paper-based signatures',
 },
  1. There's a typo in the id field for paperSigneeCantSignMessage. Please fix it:
 paperSigneeCantSignMessage: {
-  id: 'admin-portal.signature-collection:paperSigneeCantSign',
+  id: 'admin-portal.signature-collection:paperSigneeCantSignMessage',
   defaultMessage: 'Kennitala uppfyllir ekki skilyrði fyrir að skrá meðmæli',
   description: '',
 },

Line range hint 1-589: LGTM! Consider standardizing naming conventions.

The overall structure and implementation of the file are excellent. It promotes reusability, uses TypeScript effectively, and allows for efficient tree-shaking. The grouping of messages into different objects (m, parliamentaryMessages, and createCollectionErrorMessages) is a good practice for organizing related messages.

For consistency, consider standardizing the naming convention for message groups. Currently, you have m, parliamentaryMessages, and createCollectionErrorMessages. It might be clearer to use a consistent suffix or prefix for all message groups. For example:

export const generalMessages = defineMessages({ ... })
export const parliamentaryMessages = defineMessages({ ... })
export const createCollectionErrorMessages = defineMessages({ ... })

This makes it immediately clear that all these exports are groups of messages.

libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/index.tsx (1)

25-25: Adjust useNamespaces to accept an array

The useNamespaces hook typically accepts an array of namespace strings. Passing a single string might not be sufficient and could lead to unexpected behavior.

Suggested Change:

- useNamespaces('sp.signatureCollection')
+ useNamespaces(['sp.signatureCollection'])
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx (1)

135-135: Provide a more descriptive ariaLabel for accessibility

The ariaLabel is set to 'delete', which may not be descriptive enough for assistive technologies. Consider providing a more detailed label.

For example:

ariaLabel: formatMessage(m.cancelCollectionAriaLabel, { collectionTitle: list.title }),

Add the message descriptor:

cancelCollectionAriaLabel: defineMessage({
  id: 'sp.constituency.cancelCollectionAriaLabel',
  defaultMessage: 'Cancel collection {collectionTitle}',
  description: 'Aria label for the cancel collection dialog prompt',
}),
Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e8e70b8 and 0db71ad.

Files selected for processing (11)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts (2 hunks)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/navigation.ts (1 hunks)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx (4 hunks)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/index.tsx (3 hunks)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/identityAndCanSignLookup.graphql (1 hunks)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/uploadPaperSignee.graphql (1 hunks)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/index.tsx (2 hunks)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/shared-components/signees/editPage.tsx (1 hunks)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/shared-components/signees/index.tsx (3 hunks)
  • libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/ViewList/Signees/index.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (11)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/navigation.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/Constituency/index.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/index.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/identityAndCanSignLookup.graphql (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/index.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/uploadPaperSignee.graphql (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/index.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/shared-components/signees/editPage.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/shared-components/signees/index.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/ViewList/Signees/index.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Additional comments not posted (12)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/uploadPaperSignee.graphql (1)

1-8: Well-structured GraphQL mutation for paper signature upload

This new GraphQL mutation is well-designed and adheres to best practices:

  1. The mutation name SignatureCollectionUploadPaperSignature is clear and descriptive.
  2. It uses a single input parameter of type SignatureCollectionUploadPaperSignatureInput, which is good for maintainability and future extensibility.
  3. The return value includes both a success flag and reasons, facilitating robust error handling and user feedback.
  4. The mutation is self-contained, which is beneficial for tree-shaking and bundling in the context of the larger application.

This implementation aligns well with the coding guidelines for the libs directory, particularly in terms of potential reusability across different NextJS apps dealing with parliamentary processes.

libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/identityAndCanSignLookup.graphql (2)

1-7: LGTM! Query adheres to guidelines and best practices.

The Identity query is well-structured and follows GraphQL syntax. It uses proper type definition with IdentityInput and returns relevant identity information. This query aligns with the coding guidelines by promoting reusability across different NextJS apps within the portals admin module.


1-11: File adheres to coding guidelines and PR objectives.

This GraphQL file successfully introduces two queries (Identity and CanSign) that are reusable across different NextJS apps within the portals admin module. The use of TypeScript-like input types (IdentityInput and SignatureCollectionCanSignFromPaperInput) aligns with the coding guidelines. These queries effectively support the Parliamentary collection functionality mentioned in the PR objectives.

libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/navigation.ts (1)

14-14: LGTM! Consider verifying translation consistency.

The change from parliamentaryMessages.listTitle to parliamentaryMessages.signatureListsTitle appears to be a refinement of the navigation item label, likely making it more specific or accurate. This change adheres to the coding guidelines for files in the libs directory:

  1. It maintains the reusability of the navigation structure across different NextJS apps.
  2. It continues to use TypeScript effectively with imported types.
  3. The use of named imports supports effective tree-shaking.

To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script:

This will help ensure that the change has been applied consistently and that the new translation key exists in the relevant files.

libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/index.tsx (2)

1-15: LGTM: Import statements are correctly updated

The new import statements for Box, Breadcrumbs, PaperSignees, and SignatureCollectionPaths are correctly added and align with the new components and functionality introduced in this file.


69-69: LGTM: PaperSignees component added

The PaperSignees component is correctly integrated into the List component, using the listId prop. Its placement between Signees and ActionReviewComplete seems appropriate for the signature collection workflow.

To ensure the PaperSignees component is implemented correctly, could you provide more information about its functionality? Additionally, let's verify its implementation:

libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/shared-components/signees/editPage.tsx (1)

1-23: LGTM: Imports and component declaration adhere to guidelines.

The imports and component declaration follow best practices:

  • Appropriate UI components are imported from '@island.is/island-ui/core'.
  • Localization is handled using '@island.is/localization'.
  • TypeScript is used to define props, enhancing type safety.
  • The component structure suggests reusability across different NextJS apps.

These aspects align well with the coding guidelines for files in the libs directory.

libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/index.tsx (1)

9-9: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly

The addition of the Breadcrumbs component to the import statement is correct and consistent with the existing code style. This change supports the reusability of components across different NextJS apps, as per the coding guidelines.

libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/shared-components/signees/index.tsx (3)

58-58: Approved. Please clarify the design decision.

The change from "white" to "blue" for the FilterInput background is noted. While this doesn't affect functionality, it would be helpful to understand the reasoning behind this design change. Was this requested by the design team or is it part of a larger UI update?


Line range hint 1-168: Overall, the changes look good and adhere to the coding guidelines.

The modifications in this file improve functionality while maintaining good coding practices. The changes adhere to the guidelines for libs/**/* files, including:

  • Reusability of components (EditPage)
  • TypeScript usage for prop passing
  • Effective component structure for potential tree-shaking

To further improve the code:

  1. Consider grouping imports for better organization.
  2. Define prop types for the EditPage component to enhance type safety.
  3. Verify that the layout changes (removal of Box wrapper for Icon) don't negatively impact the UI.

These improvements will further enhance the code quality and maintainability of the component.


120-124: LGTM! Verify layout impact.

Removing the wrapping Box for the Icon component simplifies the structure, which is good. However, please ensure that this change doesn't negatively impact the layout or alignment of the icon within its parent container.

Run the following script to check for any other instances where this icon might be used:

libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/index.tsx (1)

137-138: Ensure numeric input for the page field

The page input field should strictly accept numeric values to prevent invalid data submission.

Verification Script:

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.63%. Comparing base (5828cef) to head (fd522e2).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16142      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.69%   36.63%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files        6776     6769       -7     
  Lines      139578   139359     -219     
  Branches    39678    39607      -71     
==========================================
- Hits        51222    51060     -162     
+ Misses      88356    88299      -57     
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.39% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 41.64% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules 23.71% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 64 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5828cef...fd522e2. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs 2460287 🔗

3 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 3 Passed
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 9 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 3.06s 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 111 2 3m 0.58s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 109 0 1m 40.22s 1 no change Link

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-presidential/AllLists/index.tsx (2)

128-128: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.

The change from m.signatureListsTitle to m.signatureListsTitlePresidential looks good and aligns with the purpose of making the title more specific to presidential signature lists. This update doesn't affect the component's reusability or impact tree-shaking and bundling practices.

Consider adding a brief comment above this line to explain why a presidential-specific title is used here. This would improve code readability and maintainability. For example:

// Use presidential-specific title for this collection
title={formatMessage(m.signatureListsTitlePresidential)}

Line range hint 1-385: Consider refactoring for improved maintainability and performance.

While the component generally follows good practices, there are a few areas where it could be improved:

  1. The component is quite large and handles multiple responsibilities. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused components for better maintainability.

  2. Some of the state management and side effects could be optimized. For example, the useEffect hook that sets the candidates could be memoized to prevent unnecessary re-renders.

  3. The filtering logic could potentially be moved to a custom hook for better reusability and separation of concerns.

Here's a high-level suggestion for refactoring:

  1. Extract the filter logic into a custom hook, e.g., useListFilters.
  2. Create separate components for ListHeader, ListFilters, and ListItems.
  3. Use useMemo for expensive computations, like filtering lists.

Example of a custom hook:

function useListFilters(allLists: SignatureCollectionList[]) {
  const [filters, setFilters] = useState<Filters>({
    area: [],
    candidate: [],
    input: '',
  });

  const filteredLists = useMemo(() => {
    // Your filtering logic here
  }, [allLists, filters]);

  return { filters, setFilters, filteredLists };
}

This refactoring would improve the component's structure, making it more maintainable and potentially more performant.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0db71ad and cf185a2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts (3 hunks)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-presidential/AllLists/index.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-presidential/AllLists/index.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/DownloadReports/index.tsx (2)

1-15: Imports and component declaration look good.

The imports and component declaration are well-structured and follow best practices. The use of TypeScript for prop definition is commendable.

Consider extracting the prop type to improve reusability:

type DownloadReportsProps = {
  areas: SignatureCollectionArea[]
}

export const DownloadReports = ({ areas }: DownloadReportsProps) => {
  // ...
}

28-38: Modal implementation is correct, but consider improving accessibility.

The Modal component is well-implemented and properly localized. However, the closeButtonLabel prop is empty, which may impact accessibility.

Consider adding a localized label for the close button:

closeButtonLabel={formatMessage(m.closeModalLabel)}

Ensure that you add the corresponding message to your localization file.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cf185a2 and db01640.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts (4 hunks)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/DownloadReports/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/index.tsx (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/index.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/DownloadReports/index.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Biome
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/DownloadReports/index.tsx

[error] 42-54: Missing key property for this element in iterable.

The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.

(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)

🔇 Additional comments not posted (1)
libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/DownloadReports/index.tsx (1)

19-27: Button implementation is correct and localized.

The Button component is well-implemented, using the appropriate props from the UI library. The use of formatMessage for localization is correct.

@albinagu albinagu added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Sep 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/ViewList/Signees/PaperSignees.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-195: Enhance compliance with coding guidelines

While the component generally adheres to the coding guidelines, consider the following improvements:

  1. Explicitly define prop types for the PaperSignees component using TypeScript interfaces or types.
  2. Consider extracting some of the complex logic (e.g., national ID validation, paper signature upload) into custom hooks. This would enhance reusability across different NextJS apps and improve the overall structure of the component.
  3. Ensure that all exported types (if any) are properly defined and exported for use in other components or apps.

These changes will further align the component with the coding guidelines for libs/**/* files, improving reusability and type safety.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 64a1019 and 3d818ad.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts (4 hunks)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/DownloadReports/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/ViewList/Signees/PaperSignees.tsx (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/lib/messages.ts
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/DownloadReports/index.tsx
  • libs/portals/admin/signature-collection/src/screens-parliamentary/List/paperSignees/index.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/ViewList/Signees/PaperSignees.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (2)
libs/service-portal/signature-collection/src/screens/Parliamentary/OwnerView/ViewList/Signees/PaperSignees.tsx (2)

124-124: LGTM: Enhanced form validation for national ID

Adding the required attribute to the national ID input field improves data integrity by ensuring this crucial information is always provided. This change aligns well with the component's purpose and enhances the overall user experience.


139-139: LGTM: Consistent form validation for page number

Adding the required attribute to the page number input field is consistent with the national ID field change. This ensures that all necessary information is collected before form submission, improving data completeness and reliability.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants