chore(j-s): Hide laws broken #16477
chore(j-s): Hide laws broken #16477
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to several Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (2)
114-122: Approved: Temporary hiding of incomplete "laws broken" sectionThe change aligns with the PR objectives by commenting out the rendering of the
IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItem. The explanatory comment is clear and helpful for other developers.Consider the following suggestions:
- Update any related unit tests to account for this temporary change.
- Add a TODO comment with a ticket number (if applicable) to track when this section should be re-enabled.
- Ensure that any documentation mentioning this feature is updated to reflect its temporary removal.
Line range hint
1-185: Approved: Overall structure and NextJS/TypeScript usageThe component adheres to NextJS best practices and makes good use of TypeScript for type safety. The structure is well-organized and follows React best practices.
For improved type safety, consider adding explicit return types to the component and any internal functions, e.g.:
const IndictmentOverview: React.FC = (): JSX.Element => { // ... } const handleNavigationTo = useCallback( async (destination: string): Promise<void> => { // ... }, [router, updateDefendant, workingCase.defendants, workingCase.id], )apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)
161-169: Approved: Temporary hiding of IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItemThe change aligns with the PR objective to hide the "laws broken" accordion section. The explanatory comment is clear and helpful.
Consider adding a TODO comment with a ticket number or date for when this should be revisited, to ensure it's not forgotten. For example:
// TODO(TICKET-123): Re-enable this section once the list of laws broken is completeapps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Completed/Completed.tsx (1)
156-162: LGTM! Consider adding a TODO comment for future reference.The change aligns with the PR objectives to hide the "laws broken" accordion section. The explanatory comment is clear and helpful. To improve maintainability, consider adding a TODO comment with a ticket number or date for when this should be revisited.
You could add a TODO comment like this:
// TODO: Uncomment this section once the list of laws broken is complete for indictment cases (TICKET-123)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Completed/Completed.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview/IndictmentOverview.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Completed/Completed.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview/IndictmentOverview.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (4)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (2)
Learnt from: unakb PR: island-is/island.is#15378 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100 Timestamp: 2024-06-27T14:37:07.823Z Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.Learnt from: unakb PR: island-is/island.is#15378 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:39:04.351Z Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (3)
Learnt from: unakb PR: island-is/island.is#14712 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/IndictmentOverview.tsx:0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:39:04.351Z Learning: The judicial system application uses a toaster notification system to handle errors globally.Learnt from: unakb PR: island-is/island.is#15378 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100 Timestamp: 2024-06-27T14:37:07.823Z Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.Learnt from: unakb PR: island-is/island.is#15378 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:39:04.351Z Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)
Learnt from: unakb PR: island-is/island.is#14712 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/IndictmentOverview.tsx:0-0 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:39:04.351Z Learning: The judicial system application uses a toaster notification system to handle errors globally.apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview/IndictmentOverview.tsx (2)
Learnt from: unakb PR: island-is/island.is#15378 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100 Timestamp: 2024-06-27T14:37:07.823Z Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.Learnt from: unakb PR: island-is/island.is#15378 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:39:04.351Z Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview/IndictmentOverview.tsx (1)
157-163: Approved: Hiding of "laws broken" section aligns with PR objectives.The commented-out section effectively hides the
IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItemas intended. The explanatory comment provides clear context for this change.Suggestions for improvement:
- Consider removing the
hasLawsBrokencalculation (line 146) if it's not used elsewhere in the component.- Adjust the surrounding conditional logic (line 156) to remove
hasLawsBroken:{hasMergeCases && ( <Box marginBottom={5}> <Accordion> {/* ... */} </Accordion> </Box> )}To ensure this change doesn't impact other parts of the component, please run:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Hiding of the "laws broken" section is correctly implemented.
The
IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItemcomponent has been successfully commented out as intended. However, thehasLawsBrokenvariable remains in use within conditional statements, which may no longer be necessary.Suggestions for improvement:
- Remove the
hasLawsBrokenvariable if it isn't used elsewhere in the component.- Adjust the surrounding conditional logic to exclude
hasLawsBroken:{hasMergeCases && ( <Box marginBottom={5}> <Accordion> {/* ... */} </Accordion> </Box> )}🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify usage of hasLawsBroken and IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItem rg --type typescript 'hasLawsBroken|IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItem' apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview/Length of output: 171
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify usage of hasLawsBroken and IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItem rg --type ts --type tsx 'hasLawsBroken|IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItem' apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview/Length of output: 167
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify usage of hasLawsBroken and IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItem rg 'hasLawsBroken|IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItem' apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview/ --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 812
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (2)
Line range hint
89-100: Verify the condition for displaying the verdict buttonThe new condition
workingCase.indictmentRulingDecision === CaseIndictmentRulingDecision.RULINGfor showing the defendantInfoActionButton looks good. It adds more specificity to when the verdict can be displayed.Please confirm that this is the intended behavior:
- The verdict display button should only be shown when the indictment ruling decision is specifically set to RULING.
- For other indictment ruling decisions, the button should not be displayed.
If this is correct, the implementation looks good. If not, please clarify the intended behavior.
Line range hint
1-247: Overall implementation follows best practicesThe component structure, use of React hooks, and TypeScript implementation align well with NextJS best practices and coding guidelines. The code demonstrates:
- Effective use of TypeScript for type safety.
- Proper use of React hooks for state management and side effects.
- Correct usage of Next.js's useRouter for navigation.
The overall architecture and implementation of this component are sound and maintainable.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Completed/Completed.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-385: Great job adhering to NextJS and TypeScript best practices!The component demonstrates excellent use of NextJS conventions and TypeScript for type safety. It follows modern React patterns with functional components and hooks, and efficiently manages state using React hooks and context. The code structure is clean and well-organized.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)
232-238: Approve change and suggest minor improvementsThe change aligns with the PR objective of hiding the "laws broken" accordion section. Good job on commenting out the code instead of removing it, as it preserves the implementation for future use.
Consider the following improvements:
- Remove the conditional rendering to clean up the code:
- {/* - NOTE: Temporarily hidden while list of laws broken is not complete in - indictment cases - - {hasLawsBroken && ( - <IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItem workingCase={workingCase} /> - )} */} + {/* + TODO: Uncomment and implement when the list of laws broken is complete in indictment cases + <IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItem workingCase={workingCase} /> + */}
- Verify if any imports related to the
IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItemcomponent are now unused and remove them if necessary.✅ Verification successful
Approve change and suggest minor improvements
The change aligns with the PR objective of hiding the "laws broken" accordion section. Good job on commenting out the code instead of removing it, as it preserves the implementation for future use.
Consider the following improvement:
- Remove the conditional rendering to clean up the code:
- {/* - NOTE: Temporarily hidden while list of laws broken is not complete in - indictment cases - - {hasLawsBroken && ( - <IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItem workingCase={workingCase} /> - )} */} + {/* + TODO: Uncomment and implement when the list of laws broken is complete in indictment cases + <IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItem workingCase={workingCase} /> + */}🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for unused imports rg --type typescript "import.*IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItem" apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsxLength of output: 183
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for unused imports of IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItem using ast-grep ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern ' import $_ from ".*IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItem.*"; if (!$_) { // IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItem is imported but not used }' apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsxLength of output: 815
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for import of IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItem rg "import .*IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItem" apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx # Check for usage of IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItem rg "IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItem" apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsxLength of output: 369
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16477 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 36.76% 36.76% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 6838 6835 -3
Lines 141611 141476 -135
Branches 40345 40290 -55
==========================================
- Hits 52069 52017 -52
+ Misses 89542 89459 -83
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 14 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 101 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 98 Passed Test ServicesThis report shows up to 10 services
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (2) |
Hide laws broken
Asana
What
Hide laws broken accordion from indictment cases
Why
The list of laws broken is not complete and does not serve a purpose at the moment. We do however want to keep the code as the list will be complete in the coming days / weeks
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
IndictmentsLawsBrokenAccordionItemcomponent across various overview routes to indicate incomplete functionality.InfoCardClosedIndictmentcomponent in thePublicProsecutorroute.Bug Fixes