fix(j-s): Disable ServiceRequirement rather then hiding it when sent to public prosecutor #15850
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new boolean constant Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant UI
participant CaseLogic
User->>UI: Interacts with form
UI->>CaseLogic: Check indictment ruling decision
CaseLogic-->>UI: Return ruling decision
UI->>UI: Set isRuling based on decision
alt Ruling is true
UI->>UI: Render service requirements
end
alt Ruling or fine
UI->>UI: Render criminal record update section
end
User->>UI: Select service requirement
UI->>UI: Disable options if sentToPublicProsecutor is true
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (4)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Completed/Completed.tsx (4)
117-119: Approve the introduction ofisRulingconstant with a minor suggestion.The introduction of the
isRulingconstant improves code readability and maintainability. It's a good practice to extract complex conditions into named boolean variables.For consistency with the existing
isRulingOrFineconstant, consider using an explicit boolean conversion:- const isRuling = - workingCase.indictmentRulingDecision === CaseIndictmentRulingDecision.RULING + const isRuling = Boolean( + workingCase.indictmentRulingDecision === CaseIndictmentRulingDecision.RULING + )This aligns with the learning from PR #15406 about retaining explicit boolean conversion for clarity.
156-176: Approve the updated conditional rendering with a suggestion for readability.The changes improve the conditional rendering logic for the criminal record update section, making it more specific and consistent with the component's purpose.
To improve readability, consider extracting the complex condition into a separate constant:
const shouldShowCriminalRecordUpdate = !sentToPublicProsecutor && isRulingOrFine; {shouldShowCriminalRecordUpdate && ( <Box marginBottom={isRuling ? 5 : 10} component="section"> {/* ... existing content ... */} </Box> )}This change would make the JSX more readable and the condition's purpose more explicit.
208-208: Approve the addition of thedisabledattribute with a suggestion for consistency.The addition of the
disabledattribute to the radio buttons, based on thesentToPublicProsecutorstate, prevents user interaction when the case has been sent to the public prosecutor. This change aligns with the PR objectives and improves the user experience.For consistency and to avoid repetition, consider extracting the
disabledlogic into a constant:const isServiceRequirementDisabled = sentToPublicProsecutor; // Then use it in each RadioButton component: disabled={isServiceRequirementDisabled}This change would make the code more maintainable and reduce the risk of inconsistencies if the disabling logic needs to be updated in the future.
Also applies to: 235-235, 258-258
Line range hint
1-321: Approve the overall implementation with a suggestion for documentation.The changes successfully implement the requirement to disable the ServiceRequirement section rather than hiding it when the case is sent to the public prosecutor. This improves transparency for court users while maintaining the integrity of the case management process, aligning well with the PR objectives.
Consider adding a brief comment above the
sentToPublicProsecutorconstant to explain its purpose and impact on the component's behavior. For example:// Determines if the case has been sent to the public prosecutor. // When true, it disables user interaction with the ServiceRequirement section. const sentToPublicProsecutor = workingCase.eventLogs?.some( (log) => log.eventType === EventType.INDICTMENT_SENT_TO_PUBLIC_PROSECUTOR, )This would improve the code's self-documentation and help future developers understand the component's behavior more quickly.
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Completed/Completed.tsx (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Completed/Completed.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Learnings (2)
Common learnings
Learnt from: gudjong PR: island-is/island.is#15406 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/CourtArrangements/CourtArrangements.tsx:69-85 Timestamp: 2024-07-02T10:26:14.812Z Learning: When working on the `CourtArrangements` component, retain explicit boolean conversion for clarity, even if it seems unnecessary.apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Completed/Completed.tsx (3)
Learnt from: unakb PR: island-is/island.is#15378 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100 Timestamp: 2024-06-27T14:37:07.823Z Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.Learnt from: gudjong PR: island-is/island.is#15406 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/CourtArrangements/CourtArrangements.tsx:69-85 Timestamp: 2024-07-02T10:26:14.812Z Learning: When working on the `CourtArrangements` component, retain explicit boolean conversion for clarity, even if it seems unnecessary.Learnt from: oddsson PR: island-is/island.is#14673 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Tables/CasesForReview.tsx:79-79 Timestamp: 2024-05-06T23:16:04.892Z Learning: The implementation of `mapIndictmentCaseStateToTagVariant` in `TagCaseState.tsx`, which maps only `CaseState.ACCEPTED` to a specific tag and defaults others to an "unknown" status, is intentional as per the application's requirements.
Additional comments not posted (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Completed/Completed.tsx (1)
177-276: Approve the updated service requirement section with a suggestion for verification.The changes ensure that the service requirement section is only rendered when the case has a ruling decision, which is consistent with the PR objectives. The implementation looks correct and includes radio buttons for each defendant.
To ensure there are no edge cases where this change might hide important information, please verify:
- Are there any scenarios where
isRulingmight be false, but the service requirement information should still be displayed?- Does this change affect any other parts of the application that might expect the service requirement section to be always visible?
You can use the following script to check for any other usages of the
ServiceRequirementenum in the codebase:This will help ensure that the change doesn't have unintended consequences in other parts of the application.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #15850 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 36.93% 36.90% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 6681 6680 -1
Lines 136457 136381 -76
Branches 38748 38732 -16
==========================================
- Hits 50401 50338 -63
+ Misses 86056 86043 -13
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 19 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ 0 Failed, 338 Passed, 0 Skipped, 1m 6.83s Total Time |
…to public prosecutor (#15850) Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Disable ServiceRequirement rather then hiding it when sent to public prosecutor
Asana
What
Today, when a case is sent to public prosecutor, we hide the ServiceRequirement section from court users. We should rather disable the section so that court users can see what ServiceRequirement was selected.
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes