fix(marriage-conditions): mock payment #16334
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
libs/application/templates/marriage-conditions/src/forms/application.ts (2)
91-91: LGTM! Consider applying this pattern consistently.The replacement of a hardcoded string with
m.informationDescriptionimproves code maintainability and supports easier localization. This change aligns with best practices for internationalization.To further improve consistency, consider reviewing the entire file for any remaining hardcoded strings that could be replaced with message constants.
Line range hint
1-524: Consider refactoring for improved maintainability.While the current implementation is functional, the
getApplicationfunction is quite large and complex. This could potentially make it difficult to maintain and test in the future.Consider the following improvements:
- Break down the
getApplicationfunction into smaller, more focused functions for each section of the form.- Extract repeated patterns (like building text fields) into reusable helper functions.
- Use composition to build up the form structure, which could make it easier to modify and extend in the future.
These changes could significantly improve the readability and maintainability of the code.
libs/application/templates/marriage-conditions/src/lib/messages.ts (1)
99-103: LGTM! Consider a minor improvement for consistency.The new
informationDescriptionmessage is well-structured and provides crucial information about the electronic signature requirement. It follows the existing pattern and uses proper TypeScript typing.For consistency with other messages in the file, consider adding a brief description of the message's purpose in the
descriptionfield.You could update the description as follows:
informationDescription: { id: 'mac.application:informationDescription', defaultMessage: 'Beiðni um könnun hjónavígsluskilyrða mun ekki hljóta efnismeðeferð fyrr en hjónaefni hafa bæði veitt rafræna undirskrift. Vinsamlegast gangið því úr skugga um að símanúmer og netföng séu rétt rituð.', - description: 'Information section title', + description: 'Description of electronic signature requirement for marriage application', },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- libs/application/templates/marriage-conditions/src/forms/application.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/marriage-conditions/src/lib/messages.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
libs/application/templates/marriage-conditions/src/forms/application.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/marriage-conditions/src/lib/messages.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (2)
libs/application/templates/marriage-conditions/src/forms/application.ts (1)
76-76: Verify the intended use of mock payment.The addition of
enableMockPayment: truealigns with the PR objective to implement mock payment functionality. This change will enable testing or demonstration of payment flows without actual transactions.Please confirm:
- Is this feature intended for development/testing environments only?
- Are there any configuration flags to disable this in production?
Run the following script to check for any mock payment related configuration:
✅ Verification successful
Run a revised script to check for mock payment configurations.
The previous script failed to recognize the
typescriptfile type. Please execute the following updated script to search for mock payment-related configurations:
Run a targeted script to search for
enableMockPaymentin TypeScript files.To ensure that
enableMockPaymentis used correctly and to verify its scope, please execute the following script:
Mock payment configuration verified successfully.
The addition of
enableMockPayment: trueis consistently used across multiple forms in the codebase, aligning with the intended implementation of mock payment functionality for testing or development environments.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for mock payment configuration # Test: Search for mock payment related configuration rg --type typescript "mock.*payment" -g '!*test*'Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for mock payment configuration # Test: Search for mock payment related configuration in TypeScript files rg "mock.*payment" --glob "*.ts" -g '!*test*'Length of output: 47
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for 'enableMockPayment' in TypeScript files excluding test files rg "enableMockPayment" --glob "*.ts" -g '!*test*'Length of output: 689
libs/application/templates/marriage-conditions/src/lib/messages.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-103: Overall, the file adheres to coding guidelines and best practices.This file follows the required standards for
libs/**/*files:
- It uses TypeScript for defining message types, which enhances type safety.
- The messages are structured in a way that promotes reusability across different NextJS apps.
- The file structure and naming conventions are consistent, which aids in maintainability.
The addition of the new
informationDescriptionmessage integrates well with the existing code and provides valuable information to users.
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 16 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 16 Passed Test ServicesThis report shows up to 10 services
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16334 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 36.78% 36.83% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 6805 6804 -1
Lines 140839 140679 -160
Branches 40025 39989 -36
==========================================
Hits 51814 51814
+ Misses 89025 88865 -160
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 11 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
* fix(marriage-conditions): mock payment * chore: nx format:write update dirty files --------- Co-authored-by: andes-it <builders@andes.is> Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements