feat(social-insurance-administration): Add e2e tests #16397
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces multiple end-to-end test suites for application processes related to additional support for the elderly, the Pension Supplement, and the Old Age Pension, utilizing Playwright for browser automation. It adds several asynchronous mock functions for the National Registry, parental leave, and Social Insurance Administration services. The Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16397 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 36.78% 36.69% -0.09%
==========================================
Files 6833 6812 -21
Lines 141431 141442 +11
Branches 40278 40337 +59
==========================================
- Hits 52024 51905 -119
- Misses 89407 89537 +130
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 210 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 4 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 4 Passed Test Services
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (5)
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (5)
6-37: LGTM: Currency list mock is well-implemented.The mock for the currency list endpoint is correctly set up using
addXroadMock. The response includes a comprehensive list of currency codes, which is appropriate for testing purposes.Consider extracting the currency list to a separate constant for better maintainability and reusability. This would make it easier to update the list in the future if needed.
38-52: LGTM: Applicant information mock is well-structured.The mock for the applicant information endpoint is correctly set up. The response includes realistic-looking data for email and bank account details, which is suitable for testing purposes.
Consider adding a comment explaining why the phone number is set to null. This could help other developers understand if this is intentional for specific test scenarios.
53-63: LGTM: Eligibility check mock is correctly implemented.The mock for the old age pension eligibility endpoint is well-structured. The response includes all necessary fields with appropriate values for testing a positive eligibility scenario.
Consider adding a function parameter to
loadSocialInsuranceAdministrationXroadMocksthat allows toggling between eligible and ineligible scenarios. This would enhance the flexibility of your tests, allowing you to cover both positive and negative cases easily.
64-74: LGTM: Application submission mock is correctly implemented.The mock for the old age pension application submission endpoint is well-structured. It correctly uses the POST method and returns an appropriate response with an application line ID.
Consider adding a
Content-Typeheader to the response to explicitly set it asapplication/json. While many clients can infer the content type, setting it explicitly can prevent potential issues:response: new Response() .withJSONBody({ applicationLineId: 1234567, }) .withHeader('Content-Type', 'application/json'),
1-74: Overall, excellent implementation of Social Insurance Administration API mocks.This file successfully implements mock responses for various endpoints of the Social Insurance Administration API, which aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of adding e2e tests for the social insurance administration module. The mocks cover essential scenarios such as currency list retrieval, applicant information, eligibility check, and application submission.
The code is well-structured, follows TypeScript best practices, and maintains consistency throughout. These mocks will greatly facilitate the implementation of comprehensive e2e tests for the Old Age Pension application process.
To further enhance the testing capabilities, consider implementing the following:
- Add more edge cases and error scenarios in the mocks to ensure robust testing.
- Implement a configuration system that allows easy switching between different mock responses for various test scenarios.
- Document the purpose and usage of these mocks in a README file within the mocks directory to aid other developers in understanding and extending the test suite.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mocks.ts (3)
6-85: LGTM: Comprehensive mock setup for "Gervimaður Afríka".The mock responses for "Gervimaður Afríka" are well-structured and cover various aspects of the National Registry API. The data seems realistic and comprehensive.
Consider extracting the kennitala "0101303019" into a constant at the top of the file for easier maintenance and readability, as it's used multiple times.
87-149: LGTM: Comprehensive mock setup for "Gervimaður útlönd".The mock responses for "Gervimaður útlönd" are well-structured and consistent with the previous mock setup. The data covers all necessary aspects of the National Registry API.
Similar to the previous suggestion, consider extracting the kennitala "0101307789" into a constant at the top of the file for easier maintenance and readability.
1-162: Overall, excellent mock setup with room for minor improvements.The file successfully sets up comprehensive mock responses for the National Registry service, adhering to NextJS best practices and making efficient use of TypeScript. The mock data is well-structured and covers various scenarios, which will be valuable for testing purposes.
To further improve the code organization and maintainability, consider the following suggestions:
- Extract frequently used values (like kennitala numbers) into constants at the top of the file.
- Group related mock setups into separate functions (e.g.,
setupPersonalInfoMocks,setupMaritalStatusMocks, etc.) to improve readability and make the main function more concise.- Use a configuration object or array to define the mock data, which could then be iterated over to set up the mocks. This would make it easier to add or modify mock data in the future.
Example refactoring:
const PERSON_1_KENNITALA = '0101303019'; const PERSON_2_KENNITALA = '0101307789'; const setupPersonalInfoMocks = async (kennitala: string, personalInfo: PersonalInfo) => { await addXroadMock({ config: NationalRegistry, prefix: 'XROAD_NATIONAL_REGISTRY_SERVICE_PATH', apiPath: `/api/v1/einstaklingar/${kennitala}`, prefixType: 'only-base-path', response: new Response().withJSONBody(personalInfo), }); // ... other related mocks }; export const loadNationalRegistryXroadMocks = async () => { await setupPersonalInfoMocks(PERSON_1_KENNITALA, person1Data); await setupPersonalInfoMocks(PERSON_2_KENNITALA, person2Data); // ... other mock setups };These refactoring suggestions would make the code more maintainable and easier to extend in the future.
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/forms/OldAgePensionForm.ts (1)
295-295: Approve: Enhanced testability with dataTestIdThe addition of the
dataTestIdproperty to thepaymentInfo.personalAllowanceUsagefield is a positive change. It improves the testability of the component by providing a reliable selector for automated tests.Consider adding similar
dataTestIdproperties to other important fields in the form for consistency and to further improve test coverage. This would make it easier to write comprehensive and maintainable tests for the entire form.apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts (2)
104-105: Use constants for test data to enhance readability.The phone number '6555555' is hardcoded within the test. Defining it as a constant at the beginning of your test improves readability and makes future updates easier.
Apply this diff to define and use a constant:
+ const testPhoneNumber = '6555555' ... await phoneNumber.selectText() - await phoneNumber.fill('6555555') + await phoneNumber.fill(testPhoneNumber)
228-238: Optimize the comment input by using shorter placeholder text.Filling a lengthy comment may not be necessary unless testing input limits. Using shorter text can speed up test execution and simplify maintenance.
Apply this diff:
- await page - .getByPlaceholder( - label( - socialInsuranceAdministrationMessage.additionalInfo.commentPlaceholder, - ), - ) - .fill( - 'Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. In vehicula malesuada augue, sit amet pulvinar tortor pellentesque at. Nulla facilisi. Nunc vel mi ac mi commodo rhoncus sit amet ut neque.', - ) + const testComment = 'This is a test comment.' + await page + .getByPlaceholder( + label( + socialInsuranceAdministrationMessage.additionalInfo.commentPlaceholder, + ), + ) + .fill(testComment)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mocks.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/setup-xroad.mocks.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/forms/OldAgePensionForm.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/forms/Prerequisites.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (7)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mocks.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/setup-xroad.mocks.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/forms/OldAgePensionForm.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/forms/Prerequisites.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (10)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (1)
1-5: LGTM: Imports and function declaration are well-structured.The imports are appropriate for the task, and the exported async function is well-named, following the camelCase convention. This setup provides a clear entry point for loading the Social Insurance Administration X-Road mocks.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mocks.ts (2)
1-5: LGTM: Imports and function declaration are appropriate.The imports and the async function declaration are well-structured and appropriate for the task of setting up mock responses for the National Registry service.
151-161: LGTM: Appropriate mock setup for marital status key.The mock response for the marital status key is well-structured and consistent with the previous mock setups. The data structure is appropriate for a key-value pair response.
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/forms/Prerequisites.ts (4)
64-64: Excellent addition ofdataTestIdfor improved testability!The addition of the
dataTestIdproperty enhances the testability of the component. The descriptive value 'old-age-pension' follows a consistent naming convention, making it easier to target this specific option in end-to-end tests.
72-72: Consistent addition ofdataTestIdfor HALF_OLD_AGE_PENSION option.The
dataTestIdproperty has been added consistently with the previous option. The value 'half-old-age-pension' follows the same naming convention, ensuring a uniform approach to test identifiers across the form options.
82-82: Comprehensive test coverage with consistentdataTestIdadditions.The addition of the
dataTestIdproperty to the SAILOR_PENSION option completes the set of test identifiers for all radio field options. This change, along with the previous two, ensures comprehensive test coverage for the application type selection, following a consistent naming convention.
Line range hint
1-265: Overall assessment: Well-structured form with improved testability.The changes made to this file are minimal but impactful, focusing on enhancing the testability of the form by adding
dataTestIdproperties to radio field options. These additions align well with the coding guidelines for library files:
- Reusability: The form structure uses modular, reusable components and builder functions, promoting reusability across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage: The file demonstrates proper use of TypeScript for defining props and types throughout the form structure.
- Effective practices: The changes don't introduce any issues with tree-shaking or bundling practices.
The overall structure of the form remains well-organized and maintainable. The additions improve the ability to write and maintain end-to-end tests without affecting the form's functionality.
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/forms/OldAgePensionForm.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-1024: Commend: Adherence to coding guidelinesThe overall structure of the
OldAgePensionFormadheres well to the coding guidelines forlibs/**/*files:
- The form definition appears to be reusable across different NextJS applications.
- TypeScript is used effectively throughout the file, with proper type imports and usage.
- The code structure supports effective tree-shaking and bundling practices.
These practices contribute to maintainable and efficient code.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/setup-xroad.mocks.ts (1)
14-17: Modularization enhances maintainability and readabilityThe refactoring to use dedicated functions for loading Xroad mocks:
await loadParentalLeaveXroadMocks()await loadSocialInsuranceAdministrationXroadMocks()await loadNationalRegistryXroadMocks()improves the modularity of the code by encapsulating related mock setups. This aligns with best practices for maintainability and readability in large codebases.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts (1)
17-21: Verify the appropriateness of the test user's phone number and data.The
phoneNumberis set to '0103019' for 'Gervimaður Afríka'. Ensure that this test data complies with data protection policies and does not conflict with any real user data.Run the following script to check if '0103019' is used elsewhere:
✅ Verification successful
Phone number '0103019' is appropriately used exclusively in test data across the codebase. No conflicts with real user data detected.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that '0103019' is only used in test data # Search for occurrences of '0103019' in the codebase rg '0103019' --type js --type tsLength of output: 1436
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/setup-xroad.mocks.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/setup-xroad.mocks.ts (1)
13-17: LGTM: Improved modularity in mock setup.The refactoring of the
setupXroadMocksfunction improves code modularity and maintainability by delegating mock setup to separate functions. This aligns well with NextJS best practices and makes the code more readable.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of each mock loading function to enhance code documentation.
You could add comments like this:
/* Xroad mocks */ // Setup mocks for parental leave services await loadParentalLeaveXroadMocks() // Setup mocks for social insurance administration services await loadSocialInsuranceAdministrationXroadMocks() // Setup mocks for national registry services await loadNationalRegistryXroadMocks()apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (4)
6-37: LGTM: Currency list mock is well-implemented, but consider using a constant for the currency array.The mock setup for the currency list is clear and concise. It correctly uses
addXroadMockwith appropriate configuration. However, to improve maintainability and reusability, consider extracting the currency array into a separate constant.You could refactor this by adding a constant at the top of the file:
const CURRENCY_CODES = [ 'ZAR', 'AUD', 'CAD', 'CHF', 'DKK', 'EUR', 'GBP', 'NOK', 'PLN', 'SEK', 'USD', 'LVL', 'CZK', 'SKK', 'IKR', 'LTL', 'VND', 'BGN', 'RUB', 'CNY', 'ALL', 'LEI', 'UAH', 'HUF' ];Then use it in the mock setup:
response: new Response().withJSONBody(CURRENCY_CODES),This would make it easier to update the currency list in the future if needed.
54-65: LGTM: Old-age pension eligibility mock is well-implemented, but consider adding explanatory comments.The mock setup for old-age pension eligibility is clear and concise. It correctly uses
addXroadMockwith appropriate configuration. The response structure includes all necessary fields for testing eligibility scenarios.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this mock and potential variations. For example:
/* Old-age pension eligibility mock * This mock represents a positive eligibility scenario. * TODO: Add variations for different eligibility scenarios (e.g., not eligible, different reason codes) */This would provide context for other developers and remind the team to implement additional test scenarios in the future.
77-89: LGTM: Additional support for the elderly eligibility mock is well-implemented, but consider adding explanatory comments.The mock setup for additional support for the elderly eligibility is clear and concise. It correctly uses
addXroadMockwith appropriate configuration. The response structure is consistent with the old-age pension eligibility mock, which is good for maintaining consistency across similar endpoints.Similar to the old-age pension eligibility mock, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this mock and potential variations. For example:
/* Additional support for the elderly eligibility mock * This mock represents a positive eligibility scenario. * TODO: Add variations for different eligibility scenarios (e.g., not eligible, different reason codes) */This would provide context for other developers and remind the team to implement additional test scenarios in the future.
1-100: Overall, excellent implementation of mock setups for social insurance administration e2e tests.This file successfully sets up multiple mocks for different endpoints related to social insurance administration, covering various scenarios including eligibility checks and application submissions. The code is well-structured, follows TypeScript and NextJS best practices, and maintains consistency across similar endpoints.
To further improve the file:
- Consider extracting repeated response structures (like eligibility checks) into reusable constants or functions to reduce duplication and improve maintainability.
- Add more comprehensive comments explaining the purpose of each mock and potential variations that might be needed in the future.
- Consider implementing a helper function to reduce boilerplate in
addXroadMockcalls, as many parameters are repeated across mocks.These improvements would enhance the maintainability and readability of the code, making it easier for other developers to understand and extend the mocks in the future.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts (3)
6-85: LGTM: Comprehensive mock setup for individual '0101303019'.The mock responses for the individual with kennitala '0101303019' are well-structured and cover various aspects of personal information. The data consistency across different API paths is commendable.
Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of each mock setup, especially for less obvious fields like
bannmerkingorhjuskaparkodi. This would enhance code readability and maintainability.
87-149: LGTM: Consistent mock setup for individual '0101307789'.The mock responses for the individual with kennitala '0101307789' maintain consistency with the previous setup while introducing new elements like place of birth. This variety in test data is beneficial for comprehensive testing.
To further enhance the test coverage, consider adding mock responses for edge cases or error scenarios. For example, you could include a mock for an individual with incomplete or missing data.
1-162: LGTM: Well-structured and comprehensive mock setup.The overall structure of the file is clean and well-organized. Having a single exported function to set up all mocks makes it easy to use in tests. The mock data is comprehensive and covers various scenarios, which is excellent for thorough testing.
To further improve the maintainability and flexibility of this mock setup:
Consider extracting the mock data into separate constants or a configuration file. This would make it easier to update the mock data without changing the logic.
Implement a factory function for creating mock responses. This would reduce repetition and make it easier to create consistent mock data across different API paths.
Example:
const createPersonMock = (kennitala: string, name: string) => ({ kennitala, nafn: name, // ... other common fields }) const person1 = createPersonMock('0101303019', 'Gervimaður Afríka') const person2 = createPersonMock('0101307789', 'Gervimaður útlönd') // Use these in your mock setups await addXroadMock({ // ... other config response: new Response().withJSONBody(person1), })This approach would make the code more DRY and easier to maintain.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts (4)
19-19: Translate inline comment to English for consistencyThe comment
// Gervimaður Afríkais in Icelandic. For consistency and to ensure all team members understand the code, it's recommended to use English for inline comments.Apply this diff to update the comment:
phoneNumber: '0103019', // Gervimaður Afríka + phoneNumber: '0103019', // Dummy person Africa
78-78: Ensure phone numbers used in tests are clearly fictitiousThe phone number
'6555555'may resemble a valid number. To avoid any potential confusion or misuse, consider using a clearly fictitious number format.Apply this diff to update the phone number:
await phoneNumber.fill('6555555') + await phoneNumber.fill('0000000') // Example fictitious number
92-92: Use clearly fictitious bank account numbers in testsThe bank account number
'051226054678'might resemble a real account number. It's important to use obviously fictitious data to prevent any accidental use of real information.Apply this diff to update the bank account number:
await paymentBank.fill('051226054678') + await paymentBank.fill('000000000000') // Example fictitious account number
41-44: Destructure helpers directly for cleaner codeYou can destructure the
proceedhelper directly from the importedhelpersmodule to simplify the code.Apply this diff to refactor:
async ({ applicationPage }) => { - const page = applicationPage - const { proceed } = helpers(page) + const { proceed } = helpers(applicationPage) const page = applicationPage
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/setup-xroad.mocks.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly/src/forms/AdditionalSupportForTheElderlyForm.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/setup-xroad.mocks.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly/src/forms/AdditionalSupportForTheElderlyForm.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (12)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/setup-xroad.mocks.ts (2)
6-8: LGTM: New imports for mock loading functions.The new import statements for mock loading functions are well-structured and consistent with the existing code style. They align with the changes in the
setupXroadMocksfunction, promoting modularity and separation of concerns.
Line range hint
1-30: Great job on improving the mock setup structure!The changes in this file significantly enhance the modularity and maintainability of the XRoad mock setup for e2e tests. By introducing separate mock loading functions for different services, the code becomes more organized and easier to manage. This refactoring aligns well with NextJS best practices and the PR objectives of enhancing the e2e testing framework.
The new structure will make it easier to add or modify mocks for specific services in the future, contributing to a more robust and flexible testing environment.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (5)
1-3: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate and follow best practices.The import statements are well-structured and follow NextJS best practices by using relative paths for local imports. They provide the necessary dependencies for setting up mock responses.
5-5: LGTM: Function declaration is clear and follows best practices.The async function
loadSocialInsuranceAdministrationXroadMocksis well-named and exported, making it easy to understand its purpose and use in other parts of the application. The use of async/await is appropriate for setting up multiple mocks sequentially.
38-52: LGTM: Applicant information mock is well-structured and provides realistic test data.The mock setup for applicant information is clear and concise. It correctly uses
addXroadMockwith appropriate configuration. The response includes realistic test data for email and bank account details, and appropriately uses null for the optional phoneNumber field. This setup will be useful for testing various scenarios in the application.
66-75: LGTM: Old-age pension application submission mock is well-implemented.The mock setup for old-age pension application submission is clear and concise. It correctly uses
addXroadMockwith appropriate configuration, including the correct HTTP method (POST). The response structure is simple and appropriate, providing an applicationLineId for a successful submission scenario. This setup will be useful for testing the application submission process in the e2e tests.
90-100: LGTM: Additional support for the elderly application submission mock is well-implemented.The mock setup for additional support for the elderly application submission is clear and concise. It correctly uses
addXroadMockwith appropriate configuration, including the correct HTTP method (POST). The response structure is consistent with the old-age pension application submission mock, which is good for maintaining consistency across similar endpoints. This setup will be useful for testing the application submission process in the e2e tests.apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts (1)
1-5: LGTM: Imports and function declaration are appropriate.The imports and the main function declaration look good. The use of async for the main function is appropriate given the nature of setting up multiple mocks.
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly/src/forms/AdditionalSupportForTheElderlyForm.ts (2)
290-290: Improved testability with dataTestIdThe addition of
dataTestId: 'personal-allowance-usage'to thebuildTextFieldforpaymentInfo.personalAllowanceUsageis a good practice. It enhances the testability of the component by providing a specific identifier for automated tests. This change maintains the reusability of the component and adheres to TypeScript standards.
Line range hint
315-321: Enhanced conditional rendering for spouse allowance alertThe addition of a condition to the
buildAlertMessageFieldforpayment.spouseAllowance.alertis a positive change. It improves the form's logic by displaying the spouse allowance alert only when the user has a spouse, based on external data. This enhancement increases the reusability of the component across different scenarios and improves the user experience by showing relevant information only when needed. The TypeScript usage in the condition function is correct and type-safe.apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts (2)
14-36: Good use of Playwright's test extension for custom fixturesThe custom extension of the base test to include
applicationPageis well-implemented, enhancing code reusability and readability.
38-212: Test steps are well-organized and readableThe use of
applicationTest.stepto organize the test into discrete, descriptive steps enhances readability and maintainability of the test code.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement/src/index.ts (1)
9-9: LGTM! Consider using named exports for better clarity.The new export statement enhances the module's interface and follows the existing pattern in the file. It complies with the coding guidelines for
libs/**/*by potentially increasing reusability and following effective tree-shaking practices.For better clarity and to make imports more explicit for consumers, consider using named exports instead of a wildcard export. This approach would make it clearer which specific entities are being exported from the
messagesmodule. For example:export { message1, message2, ... } from './lib/messages'This suggestion is optional and depends on the specific contents and usage of the
messagesmodule.apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (4)
5-37: Function declaration and currency list mock are well-implemented.The async function declaration and use of
addXroadMockfollow NextJS best practices for API mocking. However, consider refactoring the currency list into a separate constant for better maintainability:const CURRENCY_LIST = ['ZAR', 'AUD', 'CAD', /* ... */]; // Then in the mock: response: new Response().withJSONBody(CURRENCY_LIST),This change would improve readability and make updates to the currency list easier in the future.
38-52: Applicant information mock is well-structured.The mock for applicant information is comprehensive and follows good practices. To further enhance type safety, consider defining an interface for the applicant information:
interface ApplicantInfo { emailAddress: string; phoneNumber: string | null; bankAccount: { bank: string; ledger: string; accountNumber: string; }; } // Then use it in the mock: response: new Response().withJSONBody<ApplicantInfo>({ // ... existing mock data }),This change would improve type checking and documentation of the expected response structure.
77-99: Additional support for the elderly mocks are well-implemented and consistent.The mocks for additional support for the elderly follow the same well-structured pattern as the old-age pension mocks, which is excellent for consistency and maintainability. The API paths are descriptive and follow a clear naming convention.
To further improve the code, consider refactoring the common mock structure into a reusable function:
function createApplicationMocks(benefitType: string) { return [ addXroadMock({ // ... common properties apiPath: `/api/protected/v1/Applicant/${benefitType}/eligible`, // ... eligibility response }), addXroadMock({ // ... common properties apiPath: `/api/protected/v1/Application/${benefitType}`, method: HttpMethod.POST, // ... application response }), ]; } // Usage: await Promise.all(createApplicationMocks('additionalsupportfortheelderly'));This refactoring would reduce code duplication and make it easier to add new benefit types in the future.
101-123: Pension supplement mocks maintain consistency and are well-implemented.The mocks for pension supplement eligibility and application submission follow the established pattern, which is excellent for maintaining consistency across different benefit types. The response structures and HTTP methods are appropriate for their respective endpoints.
To improve code maintainability and reduce duplication, I strongly recommend applying the refactoring suggestion from the previous comment to this section as well. This would result in a more scalable and easier-to-maintain codebase, especially if more benefit types are added in the future.
Example implementation using the suggested refactoring:
const benefitTypes = ['oldagepension', 'additionalsupportfortheelderly', 'pensionsupplement']; await Promise.all( benefitTypes.flatMap(createApplicationMocks) );This change would significantly reduce code duplication while maintaining the functionality and improving the overall structure of the mock setup.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/pension-supplement.spec.ts (1)
147-165: Optimize the length of the comment input to improve test performanceThe test fills in a very long Lorem Ipsum text into the comment field. While this simulates a user entering a lengthy comment, it may not be necessary for the test scenario and could slightly increase test execution time. Consider using a shorter text to streamline the test.
Apply this diff to shorten the comment:
await page .getByPlaceholder( label( socialInsuranceAdministrationMessage.additionalInfo .commentPlaceholder, ), ) .fill( - 'Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. In vehicula malesuada augue, sit amet pulvinar tortor pellentesque at. Nulla facilisi. Nunc vel mi ac mi commodo rhoncus sit amet ut neque.', + 'Test comment for additional information.' )
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/pension-supplement.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/pension-supplement.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement/src/index.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
📓 Learnings (1)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/pension-supplement.spec.ts (1)
Learnt from: veronikasif PR: island-is/island.is#16397 File: apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts:175-193 Timestamp: 2024-10-15T12:30:02.921Z Learning: In 'apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts', the e2e test already includes an assertion to verify successful application submission in the 'Check that conclusion screen header is visible' step after 'Submit application'.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement/src/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-9: Overall assessment: Well-structured and compliant with coding guidelines.This index file maintains a clean structure and follows consistent patterns for exporting functionality. The new export enhances the module's interface without disrupting existing exports. The file adheres to the coding guidelines for the
libsdirectory by promoting reusability, likely using TypeScript, and following effective tree-shaking practices.apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (3)
1-3: Imports look good and follow TypeScript best practices.The imports are appropriate for the file's purpose, utilizing TypeScript types for enhanced type safety. This adheres to the coding guideline of optimal use of TypeScript for utility type safety.
54-75: Old-age pension mocks are correctly implemented.The mocks for old-age pension eligibility check and application submission are well-structured and follow best practices:
- Separate mocks for GET (eligibility check) and POST (application submission) requests.
- Appropriate use of
HttpMethod.POSTfor the application submission.- Response structures are suitable for each endpoint.
This implementation adheres to NextJS best practices for API route mocking and provides a solid foundation for e2e testing of the old-age pension application process.
1-124: Overall, excellent implementation of Social Insurance Administration API mocks.This file demonstrates a strong adherence to NextJS best practices and efficient use of TypeScript for type safety. The mocks are well-structured, consistent across different benefit types, and provide a solid foundation for e2e testing of the social insurance administration module.
Key strengths:
- Consistent use of
addXroadMockfor setting up API mocks.- Proper handling of different HTTP methods (GET for eligibility, POST for applications).
- Well-structured response objects that mirror expected API responses.
Suggestions for improvement:
- Refactor the currency list into a separate constant.
- Define interfaces for complex response types to enhance type safety.
- Create a reusable function for generating application mocks to reduce code duplication.
Implementing these suggestions will further improve the maintainability and scalability of the code, making it easier to add or modify benefit types in the future.
Great job on creating a comprehensive mock setup for the Social Insurance Administration API!
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/pension-supplement.spec.ts (1)
20-20: Verify the test phone number validityThe phone number
'0103019'used for testing may not conform to the expected phone number format, which could lead to test failures or inaccurate simulation of user behavior. Please ensure that the phone number used is valid and matches the format accepted by the application.To confirm the accepted phone number formats in the codebase, you can run the following script:
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/pension-supplement.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/pension-supplement.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/pension-supplement.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement/src/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
3-4: Consider adding explicit return types for imported functions.While the file structure promotes reusability and effective tree-shaking, we could further enhance TypeScript usage. Consider adding explicit return types for the imported functions:
export const getDataProviders = (): Promise<typeof import('./dataProviders')> => import('./dataProviders') export const getFields = (): Promise<typeof import('./fields')> => import('./fields')This change would improve type safety and make the exported API more clear to consumers of this module.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (4)
6-37: Consider adding a comment for the currency list.The mock for the currency list endpoint is well-structured. However, it would be beneficial to add a brief comment explaining the purpose or source of this currency list. This would improve code readability and maintainability.
38-52: LGTM: Applicant information mock is well-structured.The mock for the applicant information endpoint is correctly implemented and follows the established pattern. The use of
nullforphoneNumberis appropriate if it's an optional field.Consider adding a comment explaining the structure of the bank account object, especially if it follows a specific format required by the system.
54-75: LGTM: Old-age pension mocks are well-implemented.The mocks for old-age pension (eligibility check and application submission) are correctly implemented and follow the established pattern. The use of comments to separate different mock groups enhances readability.
Suggestion: Consider adding mocks for error scenarios (e.g., ineligible applicants or failed submissions) to ensure the system can handle various responses effectively.
77-123: LGTM: Additional support and pension supplement mocks are consistent.The mocks for additional support for the elderly and pension supplement are well-implemented and maintain consistency with the old-age pension mocks. The use of comments to separate different mock groups continues to enhance readability.
Suggestions for potential improvements:
- Consider extracting common mock response structures (e.g., eligibility check, application submission) into reusable functions to reduce code duplication.
- If these mocks are used in multiple test scenarios, consider parameterizing the responses (e.g., isEligible, applicationLineId) to allow for testing different outcomes easily.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/pension-supplement.spec.ts (3)
77-77: Consider parameterizing the test phone numberThe phone number
'6555555'is hard-coded. To enhance maintainability and flexibility, consider parameterizing the test data or using a configuration file for test inputs.
91-91: Avoid hard-coding sensitive test dataThe bank account number
'051226054678'is hard-coded. Even in test environments, it's good practice to parameterize such data to prevent potential exposure of sensitive information and to facilitate easier updates.
164-165: Use meaningful text for comments in testsCurrently, the comment field is filled with placeholder text (
'Lorem ipsum...'). Using meaningful test data that reflects real user input can enhance the relevance of the test and potentially uncover issues related to text handling.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/pension-supplement.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/pension-supplement.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement/src/index.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
📓 Learnings (1)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/pension-supplement.spec.ts (1)
Learnt from: veronikasif PR: island-is/island.is#16397 File: apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts:175-193 Timestamp: 2024-10-15T12:30:02.921Z Learning: In 'apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts', the e2e test already includes an assertion to verify successful application submission in the 'Check that conclusion screen header is visible' step after 'Submit application'.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement/src/index.ts (1)
9-9: LGTM! Enhances module export capabilities.The addition of
export * from './lib/messages'improves the reusability of the module by making all exports from the messages module available. This aligns well with the guideline of promoting reusability across different NextJS apps.The overall file structure, including this new export, supports effective tree-shaking and bundling practices. The separate imports for data providers and fields (
getDataProvidersandgetFields) allow for lazy loading, which is beneficial for performance optimization.apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (1)
1-5: LGTM: Imports and function declaration look good.The imports are appropriate, and the function name is descriptive and follows the correct naming convention. The function is correctly exported for use in other modules.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/pension-supplement.spec.ts (1)
190-203: Duplicate assertion detectedAn assertion to check that the conclusion screen header is visible after submitting the application is already included in similar e2e tests (as noted in the retrieved learnings). Ensure this duplication is intentional or consider reusing existing test components to avoid redundancy.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/pension-supplement.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/pension-supplement.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/pension-supplement.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…thub.com/island-is/island.is into feat/social-insurance-administration-e2e
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (3)
6-37: Consider adding a comment for the currency list.The mock setup for the currency list endpoint looks good. However, it might be helpful to add a brief comment explaining the source or purpose of this specific list of currencies. This would improve the maintainability and understanding of the code for future developers.
38-52: LGTM: Applicant information mock is well-structured.The mock for the applicant information endpoint is set up correctly and consistently. The use of
nullfor the phone number is noted and assumed to be intentional.Consider adding a type definition for the response object to improve type safety and documentation. For example:
interface ApplicantInfo { emailAddress: string; phoneNumber: string | null; bankAccount: { bank: string; ledger: string; accountNumber: string; }; }This would make the structure of the mock data more explicit and easier to maintain.
1-146: Overall, well-structured mocks with room for minor improvements.The
loadSocialInsuranceAdministrationXroadMocksfunction successfully sets up mocks for various Social Insurance Administration API endpoints. The consistency in structure throughout the file is commendable and makes it easy to understand and maintain.To further improve the file:
- Implement the suggested refactoring to reduce duplication in the support type mocks.
- Add type definitions for the response objects to improve type safety and documentation.
- Consider adding brief comments explaining the purpose or source of specific data, such as the currency list.
These improvements will enhance the maintainability and readability of the code, making it easier for future developers to work with and extend these mocks.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/household-supplement.spec.ts (2)
76-77: Usefill()instead oftype()for consistency and performanceIn line 77, you're using
phoneNumber.type('6555555')to enter the phone number. For consistency with other input fields (e.g., line 91) and improved performance, consider usingfill()instead oftype().Apply this diff to make the change:
- await phoneNumber.type('6555555') + await phoneNumber.fill('6555555')
141-145: Address the TODO regarding month selection to prevent flaky testsThe TODO comment indicates a potential issue with selecting an invalid month, which could lead to flaky tests. Consider implementing logic to ensure that only valid months are selected based on the current date or application constraints.
Would you like assistance in refining the test to handle invalid month scenarios, or should I open a GitHub issue to track this task?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/household-supplement.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/pension-supplement.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/pension-supplement.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/household-supplement.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (2)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/household-supplement.spec.ts (1)
Learnt from: veronikasif PR: island-is/island.is#16397 File: apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts:175-193 Timestamp: 2024-10-15T12:30:02.921Z Learning: In 'apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts', the e2e test already includes an assertion to verify successful application submission in the 'Check that conclusion screen header is visible' step after 'Submit application'.apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts (1)
Learnt from: veronikasif PR: island-is/island.is#16397 File: apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts:151-161 Timestamp: 2024-10-15T12:28:32.908Z Learning: In tests involving marital status code mocks, additional status codes beyond '1' are not required unless specifically needed.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (2)
1-5: LGTM: Imports and function declaration look good.The imports are appropriate, and the function declaration follows good naming conventions. The async nature of the function is suitable for setting up multiple mocks.
54-75: LGTM: Old-age pension mocks are well-implemented.The mocks for old-age pension (eligibility check and application submission) are correctly implemented. They follow the established pattern and use appropriate HTTP methods. The response structures are suitable for their intended purposes.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/household-supplement.spec.ts (2)
15-35: Test setup is correctly initializedThe
applicationPagefixture is properly configured, setting up the testing environment with session management, disabling unnecessary features, and navigating to the correct URL. Mocks are set up appropriately, and resources are cleanly closed after use.
205-219: Confirmation step correctly verifies application submissionThe test includes a step to check that the conclusion screen header is visible after submitting the application, ensuring that the application process completes successfully. This aligns with best practices for end-to-end testing by verifying the final state.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (2)
6-37: Consider adding a comment for the currency list.The mock for the currency list is well-implemented. However, it would be beneficial to add a comment explaining the source or purpose of this specific list of currencies. This would help other developers understand why these particular currencies are included and whether they need to be updated in the future.
38-52: Consider using more realistic test data for applicant information.The mock for applicant information is implemented correctly. However, the use of placeholder values like "mail@mail.is" for email and "2222" for bank code might not represent real-world scenarios accurately. Consider using more realistic test data to ensure your tests cover a wider range of potential inputs.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts (2)
15-35: LGTM: Well-structured test setup with room for minor improvement.The
applicationTestextension is well-implemented, providing a robust setup for the application tests. It correctly handles page creation, navigation, and cleanup.Consider adding a try-catch block around the test execution to ensure proper cleanup even if an error occurs during the test:
applicationTest: async ({ browser }, use) => { const applicationContext = await session({ // ... existing setup ... }) const applicationPage = await applicationContext.newPage() // ... existing setup ... + try { await use(applicationPage) + } finally { await applicationPage.close() await applicationContext.close() + } },
115-119: Use a constant for mock bank account number.The bank account number '051226054678' is hardcoded. For clarity and to avoid any confusion with real data, use a clearly identifiable mock account number.
Apply this diff:
+ const MOCK_BANK_ACCOUNT = '0000000000000' // Mock 13-digit bank account number ... await paymentBank.selectText() - await paymentBank.fill('051226054678') + await paymentBank.fill(MOCK_BANK_ACCOUNT)This change improves code readability and makes it clear that this is a mock value used for testing purposes.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (1)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts (1)
Learnt from: veronikasif PR: island-is/island.is#16397 File: apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts:175-193 Timestamp: 2024-10-15T12:30:02.921Z Learning: In 'apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts', the e2e test already includes an assertion to verify successful application submission in the 'Check that conclusion screen header is visible' step after 'Submit application'.
🔇 Additional comments (7)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (2)
1-5: LGTM: Imports and function declaration are well-structured.The import statements are appropriate, and the exported async function is well-named, following the camelCase convention. This structure sets up the file nicely for the mock implementations that follow.
1-169: Overall assessment: Well-implemented mocks with room for refactoring.The
loadSocialInsuranceAdministrationXroadMocksfunction successfully sets up mocks for various Social Insurance Administration API endpoints. The implementation adheres to NextJS best practices and makes good use of TypeScript. The mocks cover a wide range of scenarios, including currency lists, applicant information, and various support types.Key strengths:
- Correct use of
addXroadMockfor setting up mocks.- Comprehensive coverage of different API endpoints.
- Consistent structure across different mock types.
Areas for improvement:
- Reduce code duplication through refactoring, as suggested in previous comments.
- Consider using more realistic test data for applicant information.
- Make
applicationLineIddynamic or parameterizable for more flexible testing scenarios.By addressing these points, the file will become more maintainable, flexible, and aligned with best practices for test mock implementations.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts (5)
1-13: LGTM: Imports and setup are well-structured.The imports and initial setup are appropriate for an end-to-end test file. The use of helper functions like
disableI18nanddisablePreviousApplicationsindicates a thoughtful approach to creating a controlled test environment.
37-279: LGTM: Comprehensive test suite for Old Age Pension application.The test suite thoroughly covers the entire application process for Old Age Pension, using a clear step-by-step approach. This structure ensures that each part of the application flow is properly tested.
280-574: LGTM: Comprehensive test suite for Half Old Age Pension application.The test suite thoroughly covers the entire application process for Half Old Age Pension, including additional steps specific to this type of application. The structure is clear and easy to follow.
1-574: Overall: Well-structured and comprehensive e2e tests with room for improvement.This test file provides thorough end-to-end testing for both Old Age Pension and Half Old Age Pension application processes. The step-by-step approach ensures comprehensive coverage of user interactions and form submissions.
Key strengths:
- Clear structure and readability
- Comprehensive coverage of application flows
- Use of helper functions and mocks for a controlled test environment
Areas for improvement:
- Address the TODO comments regarding month selection to prevent potential test flakiness
- Reduce code duplication between the two test suites by extracting common steps into shared functions
- Use constants for mock data (e.g., bank account numbers) to improve clarity and maintainability
Implementing these improvements will enhance the overall quality, maintainability, and reliability of the test suite.
481-485:⚠️ Potential issueAddress the repeated TODO regarding month selection.
The same TODO comment about potential invalid month selection is present in this suite. This issue should be addressed in both test suites to ensure test stability.
Please refer to the previous comment about addressing the month selection issue. The same solution should be applied here to ensure consistency and prevent potential test failures.
...src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts (4)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The import statements are concise and relevant to the file's purpose, importing necessary types and functions from both external libraries and internal modules.
5-28: Great job on implementing a generic mock setup function!The
setupApplicationMocksfunction effectively addresses the duplication concerns raised in previous reviews. It provides a reusable way to set up mocks for different application types, improving maintainability and reducing the risk of inconsistencies.Some notable improvements:
- The function is parameterized, allowing easy addition of new application types.
- It sets up both eligibility check and application submission mocks in one call.
- The structure is consistent across different application types.
30-84: Well-structured mock setup for Social Insurance Administration APIThe
loadSocialInsuranceAdministrationXroadMocksfunction effectively sets up all necessary mocks for the API. Great job on using thesetupApplicationMocksfunction to reduce duplication for different application types.
1-84: Excellent implementation of Social Insurance Administration API mocksThe overall structure and implementation of this file are well done. Here are the key strengths:
- Effective use of TypeScript for type safety.
- Good separation of concerns with separate functions for setting up application mocks and loading all mocks.
- Reduction of code duplication through the use of the
setupApplicationMocksfunction.- Alignment with NextJS best practices and efficient state management techniques.
- Clear and consistent naming conventions.
The implementation successfully addresses the concerns raised in previous reviews about code duplication. Great job on improving the maintainability and readability of the code!
...src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
… SIA tests - coderabbit
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts (4)
21-43: LGTM: Test setup is comprehensive and follows best practices.The test configuration extends the base test with a custom
applicationPagefixture, which sets up the testing environment efficiently. It includes session management, feature disabling, and mock setup, which are all crucial for isolated and reliable e2e tests.Consider adding error handling to the setup process:
try { // Existing setup code } catch (error) { console.error('Error during test setup:', error); throw error; } finally { await applicationPage.close(); await applicationContext.close(); }This will ensure proper cleanup even if an error occurs during setup.
45-48: LGTM: Test suite structure is clear and follows conventions.The test suite is well-described and the main test case "Should be able to create application" is appropriately named to reflect its purpose.
Consider adding more test cases to cover different scenarios:
applicationTest('Should handle validation errors', async ({ applicationPage }) => { // Test invalid inputs and error messages }); applicationTest('Should allow saving draft application', async ({ applicationPage }) => { // Test saving and resuming a draft application });This will improve the overall test coverage of the application process.
49-104: LGTM: Test steps are well-structured and comprehensive.The test is broken down into clear, logical steps using
applicationTest.step(), which enhances readability and maintainability. Each step corresponds to a specific action in the application process, making it easier to debug and maintain.Consider the following improvements:
- Add more specific assertions within each step to verify the state after each action:
await applicationTest.step('Fill in applicant info', async () => { await fillApplicantInfo(page); await expect(page.getByTestId('applicant-info-summary')).toBeVisible(); });
- Implement a custom expect function for common checks:
const expectFieldToBeValid = async (page: Page, fieldTestId: string) => { await expect(page.getByTestId(`${fieldTestId}-error`)).not.toBeVisible(); await expect(page.getByTestId(fieldTestId)).toHaveClass(/valid/); }; // Usage in test await expectFieldToBeValid(page, 'applicant-name');These changes will make the tests more robust and easier to maintain.
90-107: LGTM: Final assertion effectively verifies successful application submission.The test concludes by checking for the visibility of the conclusion screen header, which is a good indicator of successful application submission. The use of the
labelfunction for locating elements supports internationalization.Consider adding more assertions to thoroughly verify the conclusion state:
await applicationTest.step('Verify conclusion screen', async () => { await expect(page.getByTestId('application-id')).toBeVisible(); await expect(page.getByTestId('submission-date')).toBeVisible(); await expect(page.getByRole('link', { name: /view submitted application/i })).toBeVisible(); });These additional checks will ensure that all expected elements are present on the conclusion screen, providing a more comprehensive verification of the application process.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts (1)
81-81: Address the TODO about potential invalid month selectionThe TODO comment indicates that the month selected may sometimes not be valid. Investigate this issue to ensure the test consistently selects a valid month, enhancing reliability.
Would you like assistance in resolving this issue or creating a GitHub issue to track it?
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement.spec.ts (1)
78-97: Use consistent async handling in test stepsIn the 'Select application reason' step, an asynchronous function is used with
async () => {}, which is appropriate. For consistency and clarity, ensure that all test steps that involve asynchronous operations use theasynckeyword andawaitas needed.This improves readability and ensures that anyone reading the test knows that asynchronous operations are handled properly.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/household-supplement.spec.ts (1)
28-28: Translate comment to English for consistencyThe comment
// Gervimaður Afríkais in Icelandic. To maintain consistency across the codebase, consider translating it to English.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/household-supplement.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/household-supplement.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (1)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts (1)
Learnt from: veronikasif PR: island-is/island.is#16397 File: apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts:175-193 Timestamp: 2024-10-15T12:30:02.921Z Learning: In 'apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts', the e2e test already includes an assertion to verify successful application submission in the 'Check that conclusion screen header is visible' step after 'Submit application'.
🔇 Additional comments (7)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts (1)
1-19: LGTM: Imports and constants are well-organized.The imports are appropriate for the test file's purpose, including necessary functions from Playwright and custom support modules. The
homeUrlconstant is correctly defined for the application URL.apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts (4)
6-23: FunctionfillApplicantInfois implemented correctlyThe function properly fills in the applicant's phone number and navigates to the next step.
25-67: FunctionfillPaymentInfohandles payment and tax information effectivelyThe function accurately fills in payment details and conditionally handles tax information based on the
includeTaxparameter.
88-99: FunctionadditionalAttachmentsproceeds correctly without actionThe function checks for the visibility of the heading and proceeds without requiring any input, as intended.
101-121: FunctionwriteCommentcorrectly fills the comment sectionThe function inputs a placeholder comment and moves to the next step appropriately.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement.spec.ts (1)
70-72:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure asynchronous helper functions are properly awaited within test steps
The helper functions
fillApplicantInfo,fillPaymentInfo,selectPeriod,additionalAttachments,writeComment, andsubmitApplicationmight be asynchronous. When passing them toapplicationTest.step, these functions should be properly awaited to ensure that each step executes in the correct order and potential asynchronous operations are completed before moving on.Apply the following changes to await the asynchronous functions within the test steps:
- await applicationTest.step('Fill in applicant info', () => fillApplicantInfo(page)) + await applicationTest.step('Fill in applicant info', async () => await fillApplicantInfo(page)) - await applicationTest.step('Fill in payment information', () => fillPaymentInfo(page, false)) + await applicationTest.step('Fill in payment information', async () => await fillPaymentInfo(page, false)) - await applicationTest.step('Select period', () => selectPeriod(page)) + await applicationTest.step('Select period', async () => await selectPeriod(page)) - await applicationTest.step('Check that additional documents header is visible', () => additionalAttachments(page)) + await applicationTest.step('Check that additional documents header is visible', async () => await additionalAttachments(page)) - await applicationTest.step('Write comment', () => writeComment(page)) + await applicationTest.step('Write comment', async () => await writeComment(page)) - await applicationTest.step('Submit application', () => submitApplication(page)) + await applicationTest.step('Submit application', async () => await submitApplication(page))Also applies to: 74-76, 99-100, 101-104, 106-107, 108-110
⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: veronikasif PR: island-is/island.is#16397 File: apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts:175-193 Timestamp: 2024-10-15T12:30:02.921Z Learning: In 'apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts', the e2e test already includes an assertion to verify successful application submission in the 'Check that conclusion screen header is visible' step after 'Submit application'.apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/household-supplement.spec.ts (1)
1-145: Well-structured end-to-end test suite adhering to best practicesThe test suite is well-organized and follows Playwright and TypeScript best practices. It effectively utilizes modular functions for repetitive tasks, enhancing readability and maintainability. The use of TypeScript's typing for
applicationPageand other components ensures type safety throughout the test.
...e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...landis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...landis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...landis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
… ISO 8601 strings - coderabbit
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts (1)
205-244: Labor service mock setup looks goodThe mock setup for the Labor service endpoints is well-structured and covers different HTTP methods and scenarios. This will be helpful for comprehensive testing of parental leave functionalities.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts (3)
21-43: LGTM: Well-structured test context setup with a minor suggestion.The custom
applicationTestcontext is well-defined and follows best practices for creating isolated test environments. The setup and teardown processes are properly implemented.Consider adding a try-catch block around the
use(applicationPage)call to ensure proper cleanup even if an error occurs during the test:try { await use(applicationPage) } finally { await applicationPage.close() await applicationContext.close() }This ensures that resources are always properly released, even in case of test failures.
49-88: LGTM: Well-structured test steps with a minor suggestion for consistency.The test steps are well-organized using
applicationTest.step(), which improves readability and maintainability. Each step focuses on a specific part of the application process, following a logical flow that mimics a real user's journey.For consistency, consider using arrow functions for all steps. For example, change:
await applicationTest.step('Fill in applicant info', () => fillApplicantInfo(page), )to:
await applicationTest.step('Fill in applicant info', async () => { await fillApplicantInfo(page) })This makes all steps consistent in their use of async/await and provides better error stack traces.
90-107: LGTM: Appropriate final assertion with a suggestion for improved robustness.The final assertion correctly verifies the successful completion of the application process by checking for the visibility of the conclusion screen header. The use of the
label()function ensures that the correct localized string is used for the assertion.To improve the robustness of the test, consider adding a timeout to the expectation:
await expect( page .getByRole('heading', { name: label( socialInsuranceAdministrationMessage.conclusionScreen .receivedAwaitingIncomePlanTitle, ), }) .first() ).toBeVisible({ timeout: 10000 }) // 10 seconds timeoutThis ensures that the test doesn't fail prematurely if there's a slight delay in rendering the conclusion screen.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts (2)
78-85: Address the TODO regarding invalid month selectionThere's a TODO comment indicating potential issues with month selection in the
selectPeriodfunction. Investigating and resolving this will enhance the reliability of the test by ensuring valid months are always selected.Would you like assistance in implementing logic to handle scenarios where a month may not be valid?
21-21: Consider using constants for hardcoded input valuesIn both the
fillApplicantInfoandfillPaymentInfofunctions, hardcoded values like'6555555'for the phone number and'051226054678'for the bank account are used. For better maintainability and clarity, consider defining these values as constants or configuration parameters.Also applies to: 37-37
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/household-supplement.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/household-supplement.spec.ts
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension.spec.ts
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (2)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts (1)
Learnt from: veronikasif PR: island-is/island.is#16397 File: apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts:151-161 Timestamp: 2024-10-15T12:28:32.908Z Learning: In tests involving marital status code mocks, additional status codes beyond '1' are not required unless specifically needed.apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts (1)
Learnt from: veronikasif PR: island-is/island.is#16397 File: apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts:175-193 Timestamp: 2024-10-15T12:30:02.921Z Learning: In 'apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts', the e2e test already includes an assertion to verify successful application submission in the 'Check that conclusion screen header is visible' step after 'Submit application'.
🔇 Additional comments (11)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts (2)
1-19: LGTM: Imports and constants are well-organized.The imports and constants are appropriately defined for the test file's purpose. The use of a
homeUrlconstant aligns with NextJS best practices for managing routes.
45-48: LGTM: Clear and descriptive test suite structure.The test suite description and test case name are well-defined, providing a clear understanding of the test's purpose and expected outcome.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts (4)
5-5: LGTM: Function declaration is well-structuredThe
loadNationalRegistryXroadMocksfunction is correctly declared as an async arrow function. This approach is suitable for setting up mock data asynchronously.
6-92: LGTM: Comprehensive mock data structureThe mock data for "Gervimaður Afríka" is well-structured and covers multiple API endpoints, providing a thorough representation of the National Registry data. This comprehensive approach will be beneficial for thorough testing.
158-168: LGTM: Marital status code mock is sufficientThe mock for the marital status code (1 - Ógiftur) is correctly implemented. Based on the past learning that additional status codes are not required unless specifically needed, this implementation is sufficient for the current testing requirements.
1-169: Overall assessment: Well-structured mock data with room for improvementThe
nationalRegistry.mock.tsfile successfully sets up comprehensive mock data for National Registry API endpoints, which is crucial for thorough end-to-end testing. The structure is consistent and covers various scenarios, including personal details, marital status, nationality, and residence information for multiple individuals.While the functionality is sound, there are opportunities to enhance the code organization and maintainability:
- Using path aliases for cleaner imports
- Refactoring repeated configuration into helper functions
- Creating reusable structures for common individual data
These improvements would make the code more maintainable and easier to update in the future, without affecting the current functionality.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts (5)
6-23: Well-structured implementation offillApplicantInfoThe
fillApplicantInfofunction is implemented correctly, utilizing Playwright's API effectively to interact with page elements and ensuring they are visible before proceeding.
25-67: Effective conditional handling infillPaymentInfoThe
fillPaymentInfofunction correctly handles conditional logic based on theincludeTaxparameter, ensuring that tax-related inputs are filled appropriately when required.
88-100:additionalAttachmentsfunction operates as expectedThe
additionalAttachmentsfunction correctly navigates through the page, proceeding without requiring additional inputs, which is appropriate for this step.
101-121: Proper handling of the comment section inwriteCommentThe
writeCommentfunction effectively fills the comment field with placeholder text, ensuring this section is completed as part of the application process.
123-136: Accurate submission process insubmitApplicationThe
submitApplicationfunction correctly verifies the visibility of the confirmation overview and performs the submission action, finalizing the application flow.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/household-supplement/src/lib/householdSupplementUtils.ts (1)
58-62: Approved: New hidden input for selected yearThe addition of
selectedYearHiddenInputextends the data extracted from the answers object without altering existing logic. This change maintains type safety and doesn't affect bundling.For consistency, consider adding a type annotation to the
selectedYearHiddenInputvariable:const selectedYearHiddenInput = getValueViaPath( answers, 'period.hiddenInput', ) as stringAlso applies to: 110-110
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement/src/lib/pensionSupplementUtils.ts (1)
3-5: LGTM! Consider grouping related imports.The import reorganization improves code structure and maintainability. The use of date-fns for date manipulation is a good practice.
Consider grouping related imports together for better readability. For example:
import { Application, ExternalData, Option } from '@island.is/application/types' import { getValueViaPath } from '@island.is/application/core' import { BankAccountType, MONTHS, } from '@island.is/application/templates/social-insurance-administration-core/lib/constants' import { Attachments, BankInfo, FileType, } from '@island.is/application/templates/social-insurance-administration-core/types' import { PensionSupplementAttachments } from '../types' import { ApplicationReason, AttachmentLabel, AttachmentTypes, } from './constants' import { pensionSupplementFormMessage } from './messages' import addMonths from 'date-fns/addMonths' import subYears from 'date-fns/subYears'Also applies to: 11-13, 15-20
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly/src/forms/AdditionalSupportForTheElderlyForm.ts (2)
356-369: LGTM: Improved dynamic month selectionThe dynamic generation of month options based on the selected year enhances the form's interactivity and user experience. The use of TypeScript for prop definitions improves type safety.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the condition's purpose for better maintainability:
condition: (answers) => { const { selectedYear, selectedYearHiddenInput } = getApplicationAnswers(answers) // Ensure month field is only shown when a year is selected return selectedYear === selectedYearHiddenInput },
370-373: LGTM: Clever use of hidden input for reactivityThe addition of
buildHiddenInputWithWatchedValueis a smart way to trigger updates on the month select options without affecting the user interface. This approach enhances the form's reactivity and can be reused in similar scenarios across different forms.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this hidden input for better maintainability:
buildHiddenInputWithWatchedValue({ // Hidden input to trigger updates on month options when year changes id: 'period.hiddenInput', watchValue: 'period.year', }),libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly/src/lib/additionalSupportForTheElderlyUtils.ts (1)
28-32: Consider Renaming 'selectedYearHiddenInput' for ClarityThe variable name
selectedYearHiddenInputmay not clearly convey its purpose or how it differs fromselectedYear. Consider renaming it to something more descriptive, such ashiddenSelectedYearorpreviousSelectedYear, to improve code readability and maintainability.libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/oldAgePensionUtils.ts (2)
Line range hint
54-162: Consider refactoringgetApplicationAnswersfor better maintainabilityThe
getApplicationAnswersfunction has grown significantly with numerous variables extracted fromanswers. To enhance readability and maintainability, consider refactoring by grouping related variables into objects or using helper functions.
Line range hint
373-389: RefactorgetAttachmentsto reduce code duplicationThe repeated calls to
getAttachmentDetailsfor different attachment types could be refactored to eliminate duplication. Consider iterating over an array of conditions and attachment types to streamline the logic.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly/src/forms/AdditionalSupportForTheElderlyForm.ts (3 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly/src/lib/additionalSupportForTheElderlyUtils.ts (4 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/household-supplement/src/forms/HouseholdSupplementForm.ts (3 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/household-supplement/src/lib/householdSupplementUtils.ts (3 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/forms/OldAgePensionForm.ts (5 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/oldAgePensionUtils.ts (3 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement/src/forms/PensionSupplementForm.ts (2 hunks)
- libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement/src/lib/pensionSupplementUtils.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (8)
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly/src/forms/AdditionalSupportForTheElderlyForm.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly/src/lib/additionalSupportForTheElderlyUtils.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/household-supplement/src/forms/HouseholdSupplementForm.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/household-supplement/src/lib/householdSupplementUtils.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/forms/OldAgePensionForm.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/oldAgePensionUtils.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement/src/forms/PensionSupplementForm.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement/src/lib/pensionSupplementUtils.ts (1)
Pattern
libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (27)
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/household-supplement/src/lib/householdSupplementUtils.ts (2)
3-26: Improved reusability with core library importsThe changes to the import statements enhance the reusability of components and types across different NextJS apps by leveraging a shared core library. This aligns well with our coding guidelines for libs/**/* files.
Line range hint
1-359: Summary: Improved reusability and maintained compliance with coding guidelinesThe changes in this file primarily focus on enhancing reusability by leveraging a shared core library for imports. The addition of the
selectedYearHiddenInputin thegetApplicationAnswersfunction extends the functionality without compromising existing logic.These modifications align well with our coding guidelines for libs/**/* files:
- Reusability across different NextJS apps is improved through the use of shared core library imports.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types is maintained.
- There's no apparent negative impact on tree-shaking and bundling practices.
Overall, these changes represent a positive step towards better code organization and reusability.
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement/src/lib/pensionSupplementUtils.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-359: LGTM! Code structure and typing adhere to guidelines.The overall structure of the file adheres to the coding guidelines:
- It uses TypeScript for defining types and exporting functions.
- The utility functions appear to be reusable across different NextJS apps.
- The code structure supports effective tree-shaking and bundling practices.
The changes made don't negatively impact the existing functionality or structure of the file.
37-41: LGTM! Please clarify the purpose ofselectedYearHiddenInput.The addition of
selectedYearHiddenInputis consistent with the existing code structure. However, the purpose of this hidden input is not clear from the context.Could you please clarify the purpose of
selectedYearHiddenInputand how it differs fromselectedYear? This information would be helpful for maintaining the code in the future.To verify the usage of this new variable, you can run the following script:
Also applies to: 114-114
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! The
selectedYearHiddenInputis utilized across multiple TypeScript files as intended.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of selectedYearHiddenInput in other files # Search for selectedYearHiddenInput in TypeScript files echo "Files using selectedYearHiddenInput:" rg --type typescript 'selectedYearHiddenInput' # Check if selectedYearHiddenInput is used in any React components echo "\nReact components potentially using selectedYearHiddenInput:" rg --type typescript 'selectedYearHiddenInput.*\bprops\b'Length of output: 392
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of selectedYearHiddenInput in TypeScript files # Search for selectedYearHiddenInput in TypeScript files echo "Files using selectedYearHiddenInput:" rg -g "*.ts" 'selectedYearHiddenInput' # Check if selectedYearHiddenInput is used in any React components echo "\nReact components potentially using selectedYearHiddenInput:" rg -g "*.tsx" 'selectedYearHiddenInput.*\bprops\b'Length of output: 3051
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive search for usage of selectedYearHiddenInput in React components # Search for selectedYearHiddenInput in all TypeScript files echo "Files using selectedYearHiddenInput:" rg -g "*.ts" 'selectedYearHiddenInput' # Search for selectedYearHiddenInput in React component files (*.tsx) without restricting to props echo "\nOccurrences of selectedYearHiddenInput in React components:" rg -g "*.tsx" 'selectedYearHiddenInput'Length of output: 3038
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly/src/forms/AdditionalSupportForTheElderlyForm.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-50: LGTM: Improved imports enhance reusabilityThe new imports, especially the utility functions, improve code reusability across different NextJS apps. The addition of
buildHiddenInputWithWatchedValueand reintroduction ofbuildSubSectionalign well with the form's enhanced functionality.
Line range hint
314-320: LGTM: Improved spouse allowance alert conditionThe updated condition for displaying the spouse allowance alert enhances the accuracy of the alert's visibility. It effectively utilizes external data, demonstrating good integration with the application's data flow. The condition is concise and readable, which promotes maintainability.
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/forms/OldAgePensionForm.ts (5)
Line range hint
1-46: LGTM: Import statements updated appropriatelyThe changes to the import statements align well with the modifications made to the form structure and functionality. The additions and reorganizations contribute to better code organization and potentially improved tree-shaking.
296-296: LGTM: Added dataTestId for improved testabilityThe addition of the
dataTestIdproperty to thepaymentInfo.personalAllowanceUsagefield enhances the testability of the component. This change facilitates easier and more reliable automated testing.
590-602: LGTM: Improved dynamic behavior for month selectionThe updates to the
period.monthfield enhance the form's interactivity and efficiency:
- Dynamic options based on the selected year improve user experience.
- The added condition ensures that month options are updated only when necessary, potentially optimizing performance.
These changes align well with best practices for creating responsive and efficient forms.
604-608: LGTM: Clever use of hidden input for optimized updatesThe addition of a hidden input field using
buildHiddenInputWithWatchedValueis an excellent approach to trigger updates in the month select field. This method optimizes form performance by avoiding unnecessary re-renders while maintaining reactive behavior. It's a smart solution that aligns well with best practices for efficient form state management.
Line range hint
1-808: Overall: Excellent improvements to form interactivity and testabilityThe changes in this file demonstrate a thoughtful approach to enhancing the Old Age Pension application form:
- Import statements have been optimized for better tree-shaking.
- The addition of
dataTestIdimproves component testability.- Dynamic behavior for month selection based on the selected year enhances user experience.
- The clever use of a hidden input field optimizes form updates.
These modifications align well with best practices for creating maintainable, efficient, and testable forms in TypeScript. The changes contribute to the overall quality and robustness of the application.
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension/src/lib/oldAgePensionUtils.ts (12)
3-6: Imports from core constants are appropriateThe addition of
BankAccountType,MONTHS, andTaxLevelOptionsimports from the core constants module improves code modularity and maintainability.
7-12: Properly importing additional typesImporting
Attachments,BankInfo,FileType, andPaymentInfofrom the core types module ensures consistent type usage across the application.
19-20: New utility imports enhance functionalityAdding
addYearsfromdate-fnsandkennitalaimproves date calculations and national identification number handling.
24-24: Including new employment-related typesThe import of
FileUpload,IncompleteEmployer, andSelfEmployedtypes supports handling different employment statuses effectively.
29-36: Importing application-specific constants improves consistencyIncluding constants like
ApplicationType,AttachmentLabel,AttachmentTypes,earlyRetirementMaxAge,earlyRetirementMinAge,Employment, andoldAgePensionAgeensures consistent usage throughout the application.
54-57: AddingselectedYearHiddenInputto application answersThe new variable
selectedYearHiddenInputis correctly retrieved fromanswersand included in the return object. This enhances the application's ability to access hidden input values when needed.Also applies to: 162-162
Line range hint
144-161: Correctly adding new payment information variablesIntroducing variables such as
bankAccountType,bank,iban,swift,bankName,bankAddress,currency, andpaymentInfoallows for comprehensive handling of bank account details and international payments.
162-162: Extending the return object ingetApplicationAnswersIncluding the new payment-related variables in the return object ensures all necessary data is available for processing downstream.
Line range hint
219-219: RetrievingbankInfofrom external data appropriatelyFetching
bankInfofromsocialInsuranceAdministrationApplicant.data.bankAccountenhances the application's ability to utilize existing bank account information.
Line range hint
291-298: Early retirement eligibility logic is correctly implementedThe
isEarlyRetirementfunction accurately determines eligibility based on age and application type, aligning with business rules.
Line range hint
352-362: Helper functiongetAttachmentDetailsimproves code clarityDefining
getAttachmentDetailswithingetAttachmentsstreamlines the addition of attachments and enhances readability.
Line range hint
373-389:getAttachmentsfunction handles additional scenarios effectivelyThe updated logic in
getAttachmentsaccommodates early retirement and self-employed attachment scenarios, improving the application's robustness.libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/household-supplement/src/forms/HouseholdSupplementForm.ts (4)
2-5: New imports are appropriate and necessaryThe added imports for
buildAlertMessageField,buildCustomField,buildDescriptionField,buildFileUploadField,buildHiddenInputWithWatchedValue,buildRadioField, andbuildSelectFieldare essential for the enhanced functionalities implemented in the form.Also applies to: 7-7, 10-10, 12-12
17-30: Utility imports enhance form functionalityThe imports from
social-insurance-administration-coreand the local utility files introduce necessary constants and helper functions likegetAvailableMonthsandgetAvailableYears, which support the dynamic features of the form.
40-42: Imports for conclusion section and utilities are correctThe imports of
buildFormConclusionSection,kennitala, andisEmptyare correctly included for form conclusion functionality and utility purposes.
47-51: Utility functions support dynamic behaviorThe addition of utility functions such as
getApplicationAnswers,getApplicationExternalData,getAvailableMonths,getAvailableYears, andisExistsCohabitantOlderThan25effectively supports the dynamic behavior and conditional logic within the form.
...istration/additional-support-for-the-elderly/src/forms/AdditionalSupportForTheElderlyForm.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...nistration/additional-support-for-the-elderly/src/lib/additionalSupportForTheElderlyUtils.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...plates/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement/src/forms/PensionSupplementForm.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...plates/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement/src/forms/PensionSupplementForm.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...es/social-insurance-administration/household-supplement/src/forms/HouseholdSupplementForm.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/old-age-pension.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/pension-supplement.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...landis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/socialInsuranceAdministration.mock.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/parentalLeave.mock.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/mocks/nationalRegistry.mock.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
...e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts (2)
22-44: LGTM: Well-structured test context setup with a minor suggestion.The
applicationTestcontext is well-defined and follows Playwright best practices. It correctly sets up a new page with specific configurations, applies necessary mocks, and disables features that could interfere with testing.Consider extracting the hardcoded phone number '0103019' into a constant at the top of the file for better maintainability. For example:
const TEST_PHONE_NUMBER = '0103019' // Gervimaður AfríkaThen use
TEST_PHONE_NUMBERin thesessioncall.
50-86: LGTM: Well-structured test steps with a suggestion for improvement.The test is excellently organized into clear, logical steps using
applicationTest.step. This structure enhances readability and makes it easy to understand the flow of the application process. The use of shared utility functions for common actions promotes code reuse and maintainability.Consider adding a brief comment before each step to explain its purpose or expected outcome. This can further improve the test's readability and maintainability. For example:
// Verify that the user can agree to data providers and start the application await applicationTest.step('Agree to data providers', async () => { // ... existing code ... }) // Ensure that the applicant information can be filled correctly await applicationTest.step('Fill in applicant info', () => fillApplicantInfo(page), ) // ... continue for other steps ...
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/household-supplement.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/household-supplement.spec.ts
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/old-age-pension.spec.ts
- apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/pension-supplement.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (2)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts (1)
Learnt from: veronikasif PR: island-is/island.is#16397 File: apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts:175-193 Timestamp: 2024-10-15T12:30:02.921Z Learning: In 'apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts', the e2e test already includes an assertion to verify successful application submission in the 'Check that conclusion screen header is visible' step after 'Submit application'.apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts (2)
Learnt from: veronikasif PR: island-is/island.is#16397 File: apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts:21-21 Timestamp: 2024-10-17T10:22:55.894Z Learning: In `apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts`, it's acceptable to hardcode test data such as phone numbers in the `fillApplicantInfo` function.Learnt from: veronikasif PR: island-is/island.is#16397 File: apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts:78-84 Timestamp: 2024-10-17T09:42:55.766Z Learning: In `apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts`, dropdown elements may not be `<select>` elements, so using `page.selectOption` in Playwright may not be applicable. Alternative methods, such as keyboard events, might be necessary when interacting with these elements.
🔇 Additional comments (7)
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/additional-support-for-the-elderly.spec.ts (4)
1-20: LGTM: Imports and constants are well-organized.The imports cover all necessary modules and utilities for the test suite. The
homeUrlconstant is correctly defined, which will be used throughout the test for navigation.
46-49: LGTM: Clear and descriptive test suite setup.The test suite is well-described, and the test case title clearly indicates its purpose. The use of
applicationTestensures that the correct testing context is applied.
88-103: LGTM: Appropriate final assertion for successful application submission.The final step correctly verifies that the application submission process is successful by checking for the visibility of the conclusion screen header. The use of the
labelfunction ensures that the correct localized text is used for the assertion.As per the retrieved learning, this assertion aligns with the existing practice of verifying successful application submission in the 'Check that conclusion screen header is visible' step after 'Submit application'.
1-105: Overall: Excellent implementation of end-to-end test for additional support for the elderly application.This test file demonstrates a well-structured, comprehensive approach to end-to-end testing for the additional support for the elderly application process. Key strengths include:
- Clear organization using
applicationTest.stepfor improved readability.- Effective use of shared utility functions for common actions.
- Proper setup of test context and environment.
- Adherence to NextJS best practices and efficient use of TypeScript.
The test covers all major steps of the application process and includes necessary assertions to verify successful completion. The minor suggestions provided earlier (extracting the phone number constant and adding brief comments for each step) would further enhance the already high-quality implementation.
apps/system-e2e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts (3)
7-16: Well-structured helper function for heading visibilityThe
expectHeadingToBeVisiblefunction effectively abstracts heading visibility checks, promoting code reuse and improving maintainability.
34-75: Conditional logic infillPaymentInfois correctly implementedThe
fillPaymentInfofunction correctly handles the optional tax information based on theincludeTaxparameter, ensuring that necessary inputs are provided when required.
77-92: Dropdown interactions inselectPeriodare appropriately handledThe
selectPeriodfunction correctly handles the selection of year and month using keyboard events, which is suitable given that dropdown elements may not be standard<select>elements.
...e/src/tests/islandis/application-system/acceptance/social-insurance-administration/shared.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
[TS-106] e2e tests (Old-age-pension)
[TS-319] e2e tests (Additional-support-for-the-elderly)
[TS-156] e2e tests (Pension-supplement)
[TS-155] e2e tests (Household-supplement)
[TS-324] e2e test for 1/2 old age pension
What
Added e2e tests for TR applications
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
dataTestIdproperties in various forms.Bug Fixes