feat(j-s): Store Subpoena PDF and HASH #16235
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces changes to the management of subpoenas in the judicial system application. A new migration file is added to update the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241002084126-update-subpoena.js (2)
1-1: Remove redundant 'use strict' directiveThe 'use strict' directive is unnecessary in this context as JavaScript modules are automatically in strict mode.
Apply this change to remove the redundant directive:
-'use strict'🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 1-1: Redundant use strict directive.
The entire contents of JavaScript modules are automatically in strict mode, with no statement needed to initiate it.
Safe fix: Remove the redundant use strict directive.(lint/suspicious/noRedundantUseStrict)
1-22: Overall implementation aligns well with PR objectivesThis migration file successfully implements the database changes required for storing subpoena hashes:
- Adds a 'hash' column to the 'subpoena' table
- Provides a method to revert the changes if needed
- Uses transactions to ensure data integrity
The implementation aligns perfectly with the PR objective of "storing generated subpoenas in Amazon S3 and saving their corresponding MD5 hashes in the database."
Consider adding an index to the 'hash' column if you plan to perform frequent lookups using this field. This can be done in a separate migration if needed.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 1-1: Redundant use strict directive.
The entire contents of JavaScript modules are automatically in strict mode, with no statement needed to initiate it.
Safe fix: Remove the redundant use strict directive.(lint/suspicious/noRedundantUseStrict)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/guards/subpoenaExists.guard.ts (2)
27-30: Approved with a suggestion for error handlingThe changes improve the guard's functionality by handling the case when
defendantis not present. The added comment enhances code readability.However, consider adding error handling for the case where
findBySubpoenaIddoesn't find a subpoena:const subpoena = await this.subpoenaService.findBySubpoenaId(subpoenaId); if (!subpoena) { throw new NotFoundException(`Subpoena with ID ${subpoenaId} not found`); } request.subpoena = subpoena;This ensures consistent error handling across different scenarios.
Line range hint
33-43: Approved with a suggestion for type safetyThe changes improve the guard's functionality and error handling. The added comment and more specific error message enhance code readability and debugging.
To further improve type safety, consider adding a type guard for the
subpoena:const subpoena = defendant.subpoenas?.find( (s): s is NonNullable<typeof s> => s.id === subpoenaId );This ensures that
subpoenais correctly typed as non-null when found, which aligns with TypeScript best practices.apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/models/subpoena.model.ts (1)
80-82: LGTM! Consider a more specific property name.The addition of the
hashproperty aligns well with the PR objective of storing MD5 hashes for subpoenas. The implementation is consistent with the rest of the file and follows TypeScript best practices.Consider using a more specific name for the property, such as
md5HashorsubpoenaHash, to improve clarity and maintainability.- hash?: string + md5Hash?: stringapps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/subpoenaPdf.ts (1)
159-161: LGTM: Confirmation details added correctly.The addition of the
addConfirmationfunction call whenconfirmationis provided is correct and aligns with the PR objective. To improve clarity, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this block:// Add confirmation details to the PDF if provided if (confirmation) { addConfirmation(doc, confirmation) }apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts (2)
60-74: LGTM: NewsetHashmethod implemented correctlyThe new
setHashmethod aligns well with the PR objective of storing subpoena hashes. The error handling is comprehensive, covering cases of unexpected number of affected rows.A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider using a custom error message for the case when more than one row is affected, similar to how you're handling the case of no affected rows. This would provide more specific information about the nature of the error.
if (numberOfAffectedRows > 1) { - // Tolerate failure, but log error - this.logger.error( - `Unexpected number of rows (${numberOfAffectedRows}) affected when updating subpoena hash for subpoena ${id}`, - ) + throw new InternalServerErrorException(`Unexpected number of rows (${numberOfAffectedRows}) affected when updating subpoena hash for subpoena ${id}`) } else if (numberOfAffectedRows < 1) { throw new InternalServerErrorException(`Could not update subpoena ${id}`) }This change would make the error handling more consistent and provide more detailed information in case of an unexpected state.
Line range hint
1-185: Overall assessment: Changes align with PR objectives and improve code qualityThe implementation of storing subpoena hashes has been successfully added, aligning with the PR objectives. Error handling and messaging have been improved, enhancing the overall robustness of the code.
To further improve consistency in error handling:
Consider adopting a uniform approach to error handling across the service. For instance, you might want to create custom exception classes for different types of errors (e.g.,
SubpoenaNotFoundException,SubpoenaUpdateException) and use them consistently throughout the service. This would make error handling more standardized and easier to manage as the codebase grows.Example:
export class SubpoenaNotFoundException extends NotFoundException { constructor(subpoenaId: string) { super(`Subpoena with subpoena id ${subpoenaId} not found`); } } export class SubpoenaUpdateException extends InternalServerErrorException { constructor(subpoenaId: string, affectedRows: number) { super(`Unexpected number of rows (${affectedRows}) affected when updating subpoena ${subpoenaId}`); } }These custom exceptions could then be used in your methods, providing a more consistent and maintainable approach to error handling.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/pdf.service.ts (1)
304-304: Redundant assignment toundefinedThe variable
confirmationis explicitly initialized toundefined, which is unnecessary since variables declared withletareundefinedby default.Consider simplifying the declaration:
-let confirmation: Confirmation | undefined = undefined +let confirmation: Confirmation | undefined
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241002084126-update-subpoena.js (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/subpoenaPdf.ts (4 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/pdf.service.ts (4 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/guards/subpoenaExists.guard.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/models/subpoena.model.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (6)
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241002084126-update-subpoena.js (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/subpoenaPdf.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/pdf.service.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/guards/subpoenaExists.guard.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/models/subpoena.model.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🪛 Biome
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241002084126-update-subpoena.js
[error] 1-1: Redundant use strict directive.
The entire contents of JavaScript modules are automatically in strict mode, with no statement needed to initiate it.
Safe fix: Remove the redundant use strict directive.(lint/suspicious/noRedundantUseStrict)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241002084126-update-subpoena.js (2)
4-13: LGTM:upmethod implementationThe
upmethod is well-implemented:
- Uses a transaction for atomicity
- Adds the 'hash' column as described in the PR objectives
- Allows null values, which is appropriate for existing records
- Follows Sequelize migration best practices
15-21: LGTM:downmethod implementationThe
downmethod is correctly implemented:
- Uses a transaction for atomicity
- Properly reverses the action of the
upmethod by removing the 'hash' column- Follows Sequelize migration best practices
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/guards/subpoenaExists.guard.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-63: Overall assessment: Improvements in guard functionality and error handlingThe changes to the
SubpoenaExistsGuardclass enhance its functionality by:
- Handling cases where the defendant is not present.
- Improving error messages for better debugging and user feedback.
- Adding clarifying comments to explain the context of
subpoenaId.These modifications adhere to NextJS and TypeScript best practices, improving the overall code quality and maintainability. The guard now provides more robust checking for subpoena existence across different scenarios.
Consider implementing the suggested improvements for error handling and type safety to further enhance the code.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/subpoenaPdf.ts (4)
25-25: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The
Confirmationtype has been added to the import statement frompdfHelpers. This addition is necessary for the newconfirmationparameter in thecreateSubpoenafunction.
37-37: LGTM: Function signature updated correctly.The
createSubpoenafunction signature has been updated to include the new optional parameterconfirmationof typeConfirmation. This change maintains backward compatibility while allowing for the new functionality.
56-58: Please clarify the purpose of adding empty lines.A new conditional block has been added to insert 5 empty lines when
confirmationis provided. Could you please explain the reasoning behind this layout adjustment? It might be helpful to add a comment explaining why these empty lines are necessary when a confirmation is present.
Line range hint
37-167: LGTM: Changes align with PR objective and maintain code integrity.The modifications to the
createSubpoenafunction successfully implement the new confirmation functionality while maintaining the integrity of the existing code. The changes are minimal and focused, aligning well with the PR objective.To ensure the changes don't introduce any regressions:
Please review the output to ensure all calls to
createSubpoenaare updated correctly if needed, or confirm that existing calls don't need modification due to the optional nature of the new parameter.apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts (2)
5-10: LGTM: Import statements updated correctlyThe addition of
InternalServerErrorExceptionto the import statement is appropriate for the new error handling in thesetHashmethod.
138-138: LGTM: Improved error message clarityThe update to the error message in the
findBySubpoenaIdmethod enhances clarity by specifying "subpoena id" instead of just "id". This change improves the readability and specificity of error messages, which is a good practice.apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/pdf.service.ts (3)
5-5: Correctly importingforwardRefThe addition of
forwardReffrom@nestjs/commonis appropriate for handling circular dependencies during dependency injection.
37-37: Properly importingSubpoenaandSubpoenaServiceImporting
SubpoenaandSubpoenaServicefrom'../subpoena'is necessary for the added functionality related to subpoenas.
49-50: UsingforwardRefforSubpoenaServiceinjectionUtilizing
@Inject(forwardRef(() => SubpoenaService))ensures that circular dependencies are correctly managed when injectingSubpoenaServiceintoPdfService.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/pdf.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/pdf.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16235 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 36.93% 36.76% -0.17%
==========================================
Files 6781 6787 +6
Lines 139980 139935 -45
Branches 39802 39800 -2
==========================================
- Hits 51699 51449 -250
- Misses 88281 88486 +205
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 49 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ 0 Failed, 21238 Passed, 0 Skipped, 18m 54.73s Total Time 🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)
|
oddsson
added
automerge
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/pdf.service.ts (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/pdf.service.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/pdf.service.ts (3)
5-5: LGTM: Import statements updated correctlyThe import statements have been updated to include the necessary dependencies for the new subpoena functionality. The addition of
forwardRefsuggests proper handling of potential circular dependencies, which is a good practice in NextJS applications.Also applies to: 37-37
49-50: LGTM: Proper dependency injection for SubpoenaServiceThe
SubpoenaServiceis correctly injected usingforwardRef, which is the recommended approach for handling circular dependencies in NextJS applications. This addresses the previous question about whyforwardRefis used here and not for other services likeUserService. It's likely that there's a circular dependency betweenPdfServiceandSubpoenaService.
301-306: LGTM: Method signature updated for flexibilityThe
getSubpoenaPdfmethod signature has been updated to include optional parameters, allowing for more flexible use. This change supports both new subpoena creation and existing subpoena retrieval, which aligns well with the PR objectives. The use of optional parameters is a good TypeScript practice, enhancing type safety.
Store Subpoena PDF and HASH
Vista fyrirkall í S3 og MD5 fyrir fyrirkallið
What
Why
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
hashcolumn to thesubpoenatable for better data integrity.Bug Fixes
Documentation
hashproperty in theSubpoenamodel.