fix(j-s): Defender Subpoena #16229
fix(j-s): Defender Subpoena #16229
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/limitedAccessSubpoena.controller.ts (1)
Issues Found: Removed parameters are still in use elsewhere
The
arraignmentDate,location, andsubpoenaTypeparameters have remaining usages in multiple files across the codebase:
Subpoena.tsxOverview.tsxsubpoenaPdf.tssubpoena.controller.tsfile.controller.tssubpoena.response.tsRemoving these parameters from the
getSubpoenaPdfmethod may impact these areas. Please review and address these dependencies to ensure functionality is not broken.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
60-85: Simplified method signature and loggingThe
getSubpoenaPdfmethod has been refactored:
- Removed query parameters:
arraignmentDate,location, andsubpoenaType.- Simplified the logging statement.
These changes suggest that the subpoena data is now fully determined by the
subpoenaId, which is a more robust approach. The code maintains type safety and improves readability.However, please verify that this change doesn't break any existing functionality that might have relied on the removed query parameters.
Let's check for any usages of the removed parameters in other parts of the codebase:
The previous script encountered syntax errors. Please find below a corrected shell script to verify the usages of the removed parameters:
The previous script encountered an issue with the file type recognition. Please find below a corrected shell script that searches within
.tsand.tsxfiles for the removed parameters:🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usages of removed parameters # Test: Search for usages of arraignmentDate, location, and subpoenaType in relation to subpoena rg -t typescript 'subpoena.*arraignmentDate|subpoena.*location|subpoena.*subpoenaType'Length of output: 378
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usages of removed parameters: arraignmentDate, location, subpoenaType in relation to subpoena rg -t typescript '(subpoena.*arraignmentDate|subpoena.*location|subpoena.*subpoenaType)'Length of output: 125
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usages of removed parameters: arraignmentDate, location, subpoenaType in relation to subpoena rg '(subpoena.*arraignmentDate|subpoena.*location|subpoena.*subpoenaType)' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx'Length of output: 1657
apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/file/file.controller.ts (1)
188-196: Approved: Improved flexibility and adherence to best practicesThe changes to the
getSubpoenaPdfmethod are well-implemented and provide several benefits:
- Making
subpoenaIdoptional allows the method to handle both draft and finalized subpoenas.- The addition of optional query parameters (
arraignmentDate,location,subpoenaType) provides more context for subpoena generation.- The updated logging statement correctly handles the optional
subpoenaId.- The URL construction has been appropriately modified to accommodate the optional
subpoenaIdand new query parameters.These changes adhere to TypeScript and NextJS API route best practices, improving the overall flexibility and functionality of the method.
Consider extracting the URL construction logic into a separate private method to improve readability:
private constructSubpoenaUrl( defendantId: string, subpoenaId?: string, arraignmentDate?: string, location?: string, subpoenaType?: SubpoenaType ): string { const subpoenaIdInjection = subpoenaId ? `/${subpoenaId}` : '' const queryInjection = arraignmentDate ? `?arraignmentDate=${arraignmentDate}&location=${location}&subpoenaType=${subpoenaType}` : '' return `defendant/${defendantId}/subpoena${subpoenaIdInjection}${queryInjection}` }Then, you can use it in the
getSubpoenaPdfmethod:return this.fileService.tryGetFile( user.id, AuditedAction.GET_SUBPOENA_PDF, id, this.constructSubpoenaUrl(defendantId, subpoenaId, arraignmentDate, location, subpoenaType), req, res, 'pdf', )This refactoring would improve code organization and make the
getSubpoenaPdfmethod more concise.Also applies to: 199-203
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/file/file.controller.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/file/limitedAccessFile.controller.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/limitedAccessSubpoena.controller.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/limitedAccessSubpoenaController/getSubpoenaPdf.spec.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/limitedAccessSubpoenaController/getSubpoenaPdf.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/file/file.controller.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/file/limitedAccessFile.controller.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/limitedAccessSubpoena.controller.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/limitedAccessSubpoena.controller.ts (3)
Line range hint
1-85: Summary of changes and their impactThe changes in this file improve the
LimitedAccessSubpoenaController:
- Simplified the
getSubpoenaPdfmethod signature by removing unnecessary query parameters.- Improved logging for better clarity.
- Maintained adherence to NestJS best practices and effective use of TypeScript.
These changes should lead to more maintainable and robust code. However, ensure that:
- The removal of query parameters doesn't break existing functionality elsewhere in the application.
- Adequate error handling is implemented.
- The changes are reflected in the API documentation, if any exists.
Overall, the modifications appear to be a positive step towards a more streamlined API.
Line range hint
1-85: Overall structure and best practicesThe controller is well-structured and follows NestJS best practices:
- Effective use of decorators and guards.
- Clear separation of concerns.
- Proper use of dependency injection.
Suggestions for improvement:
- Consider adding explicit error handling in the
getSubpoenaPdfmethod.- Add input validation for the
caseId,defendantId, andsubpoenaIdparameters.- Consider adding unit tests for this controller if not already present.
Here's a suggestion for adding error handling:
async getSubpoenaPdf( // ... existing parameters ): Promise<void> { try { this.logger.debug( `Getting subpoena ${subpoenaId} for defendant ${defendantId} of case ${caseId} as a pdf document`, ) const pdf = await this.pdfService.getSubpoenaPdf( theCase, defendant, subpoena, ) res.end(pdf) } catch (error) { this.logger.error(`Error getting subpoena PDF: ${error.message}`, error) res.status(500).json({ message: 'Error generating subpoena PDF' }) } }Let's check for existing error handling patterns in the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for error handling patterns # Test: Search for try-catch blocks in controller files rg -t typescript 'try\s*{.*}\s*catch' --glob '*controller.ts'
Line range hint
1-42: Clarification on framework usageThis file uses NestJS, a backend framework, rather than NextJS as mentioned in the coding guidelines. The TypeScript usage and overall structure are appropriate for a NestJS backend controller. However, the NextJS-specific best practices mentioned in the guidelines are not directly applicable to this backend code.
To confirm this is indeed a NestJS backend file, let's check for other NestJS-related files:
✅ Verification successful
Confirmation of NestJS Framework Usage
The shell script results confirm that the project extensively uses NestJS, as evidenced by the presence of multiple
app.module.tsandmain.tsfiles across various applications and the inclusion of@nestjs/*dependencies inpackage.json. The initial review comment accurately identified the framework, and no issues were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify NestJS usage in the project # Test: Search for NestJS-specific files fd -e ts 'main.ts|app.module.ts' # Test: Check for NestJS dependencies in package.json rg '"@nestjs/' package.jsonLength of output: 4285
apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/file/limitedAccessFile.controller.ts (1)
Line range hint
179-201: Improved subpoena retrieval specificity. LGTM!The changes to the
getSubpoenaPdfmethod enhance the specificity of subpoena retrieval by including thesubpoenaIdin the route and file path. This aligns well with RESTful design principles and should address the issue mentioned in the PR objectives.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose and format of the
subpoenaIdfor future maintainers.Please ensure that any related API documentation or specifications are updated to reflect this change in the endpoint structure.
If the script returns any results, it indicates that there might be client code still using the old endpoint structure, which would need to be updated.
✅ Verification successful
Subpoena retrieval endpoint changes verified: No impact on existing client code.
The updated
getSubpoenaPdfmethod and endpoint structure do not affect any existing client code, as no usages of the old subpoena endpoint were found. The changes enhance the API's specificity and align with RESTful principles.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential impacts on existing client code # Test: Search for calls to the old subpoena endpoint rg --type typescript --type javascript 'GET.*subpoena/[^/]+$' --glob '!**/limitedAccessFile.controller.ts'Length of output: 143
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential impacts on existing client code by searching old subpoena endpoint usage # Search within .ts and .js files for GET requests to the old subpoena endpoint, excluding the specified controller rg --glob '**/*.ts' --glob '**/*.js' 'GET.*subpoena/[^/]+$' --glob '!apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/file/limitedAccessFile.controller.ts'Length of output: 149
Datadog ReportAll test runs ❌ 74 Total Test Services: 1 Failed, 71 Passed Test ServicesThis report shows up to 10 services
❌ Failed Tests (1)
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (2) |
Defender Subpoena
Verjandi sér fyrirkall en getur ekki opnað það
What
Why
Screenshots / Gifs
Screen.Recording.2024-10-02.at.10.26.03.mov
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
getSubpoenaPdfmethod now accepts an optionalsubpoenaId, allowing for more flexible subpoena retrieval.Bug Fixes
Tests
getSubpoenaPdfmethod, ensuring accurate PDF generation verification.