Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(j-s): National Id Lookup Check #16190

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024
Merged

fix(j-s): National Id Lookup Check #16190

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

gudjong
Copy link
Member

@gudjong gudjong commented Sep 27, 2024

National Id Lookup Check

Ekki hægt að komast áfram af málsmeðferðarskjá nema setja inn kröfuhafa og hafa aðgang að þjóðskráruppflettingu

What

  • Removes national id lookup check as it was hampering navigation.

Why

  • Verified bug.

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Simplified the logic for determining the validity of processing steps, enhancing reliability and performance.

@gudjong gudjong requested a review from a team as a code owner September 27, 2024 12:39
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the Processing component in the Processing.tsx file by simplifying the logic for determining the validity of a processing step. The previous implementation involved a dual condition check, which has been streamlined to a single check that only evaluates the validity of the processing step using the isProcessingStepValidIndictments(workingCase) function.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx Simplified the logic for determining the validity of a processing step by removing the condition checking nationalIdNotFound. Now, stepIsValid depends solely on the validity check function.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

automerge

Suggested reviewers

  • oddsson

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-724: Suggestions for optimization and maintainability

While the overall structure of the component follows good practices, here are some suggestions for further improvement:

  1. Consider breaking down this large component into smaller, more manageable sub-components. This will improve readability and maintainability.

  2. Some of the useCallback hooks, like handleUpdateDefendant and handleUpdateCivilClaimant, have dependencies that change on every render (e.g., updateDefendantState, setWorkingCase). Consider memoizing these dependencies or moving the functions outside of the component if possible.

  3. The useEffect hook that depends on personData has a commented-out eslint-disable rule. Instead of disabling the rule, consider including all necessary dependencies or refactoring the effect to avoid the lint warning.

  4. The component uses multiple state updates in functions like handleHasCivilClaimsChange. Consider combining these updates into a single state update to reduce re-renders.

Here's an example of how you could optimize the handleHasCivilClaimsChange function:

const handleHasCivilClaimsChange = useCallback(async (hasCivilClaims: boolean) => {
  setWorkingCase((prevCase) => {
    const updatedCase = {
      ...prevCase,
      hasCivilClaims,
      civilClaimants: hasCivilClaims ? [...(prevCase.civilClaimants || []), { id: 'temp-id', name: '', nationalId: '' }] : [],
    };
    
    setAndSendCaseToServer([{ hasCivilClaims, force: true }], updatedCase, setWorkingCase);
    
    return updatedCase;
  });

  if (hasCivilClaims) {
    const civilClaimantId = await createCivilClaimant({ caseId: workingCase.id });
    setWorkingCase((prevCase) => ({
      ...prevCase,
      civilClaimants: prevCase.civilClaimants?.map(claimant => 
        claimant.id === 'temp-id' ? { ...claimant, id: civilClaimantId } : claimant
      ),
    }));
  }
}, [createCivilClaimant, setAndSendCaseToServer, setWorkingCase, workingCase.id]);

This optimization combines multiple state updates and reduces the number of re-renders.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a8b2817 and f9548c4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: gudjong
PR: island-is/island.is#15421
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx:55-61
Timestamp: 2024-07-03T15:43:13.884Z
Learning: The `updateCase` method in the `apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx` file has its own error handling, and additional error handling in the `initialize` function is not necessary.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx (1)
Learnt from: gudjong
PR: island-is/island.is#15421
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx:55-61
Timestamp: 2024-07-03T15:43:13.884Z
Learning: The `updateCase` method in the `apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx` file has its own error handling, and additional error handling in the `initialize` function is not necessary.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx (1)

115-115: Approval with verification request: Simplified step validation

The removal of the nationalIdNotFound check from the stepIsValid condition aligns with the PR objective of removing the national ID lookup check that was obstructing user navigation. This change should improve the user experience by allowing users to proceed even if a national ID is not found.

Please verify that removing this check doesn't introduce any security or data integrity issues in the following areas:

  1. Downstream processes that might depend on the national ID.
  2. Any reporting or analytics that might be affected by potentially missing national IDs.

Run the following script to check for any other usages of nationalIdNotFound in the codebase:

This will help ensure that we haven't missed any other places where this check might be important.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 27, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.70%. Comparing base (eac1952) to head (9f33e2c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...s/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #16190   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   36.70%   36.70%           
=======================================
  Files        6776     6776           
  Lines      139609   139603    -6     
  Branches    39693    39687    -6     
=======================================
  Hits        51243    51243           
+ Misses      88366    88360    -6     
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.39% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 41.62% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules 23.70% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
application-templates-driving-license 18.70% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-shell 21.29% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-web 28.16% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...s/Prosecutor/Indictments/Processing/Processing.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update eac1952...9f33e2c. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Sep 27, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: j-s/fix-navigation
Commit report: c25c35f
Test service: api

✅ 0 Failed, 4 Passed, 0 Skipped, 3.06s Total Time
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 no change

@gudjong gudjong added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Sep 27, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 775256a into main Sep 27, 2024
39 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the j-s/fix-navigation branch September 27, 2024 16:49
thoreyjona pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants