Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(j-s): Civil claimant view for courts #16171

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

unakb
Copy link
Member

@unakb unakb commented Sep 26, 2024

Bótakröfur - bæta við réttargæslumanni / lögmanni kröfuhafa á verjenda skjá í dómaraflæði.

What

Added civil claimant advocate input information for court screen where the judge can edit the chosen civil claimant advocates if they have been registered, as well as choose to share documents with them.

Why

The court should be able to edit and change this as needed.

Screenshots / Gifs

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced role-based access control for civil claimant actions.
    • Introduced a new component for selecting civil claimant advocates.
    • Added internationalized strings for the advocates section.
  • Changes

    • Updated existing components to reflect the new advocates functionality.
    • Renamed components and updated imports accordingly.
    • Removed outdated internationalization strings related to defenders.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Ensured consistent text references across components.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces multiple changes across several files in the judicial system application. Key modifications include the expansion of role-based access control in the CivilClaimantController, updates to component imports and exports, and the introduction of new components and internationalization strings for managing civil claimant advocates. The HearingArrangements component has been renamed to Advocates, reflecting a broader functionality. Additionally, the deletion of the Defender.strings.ts file consolidates string resources under a new structure, enhancing localization capabilities.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/defendant/civilClaimant.controller.ts Expanded role-based access control for create and update methods with new roles; updated imports.
apps/judicial-system/web/pages/domur/akaera/malflytjendur/[id].ts Renamed import and default export from HearingArrangements to Advocates.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.strings.ts Introduced new file for internationalized string messages for advocates section.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.tsx Renamed component from HearingArrangements to Advocates; updated imports and internal logic for advocates.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/SelectCivilClaimantAdvocate.tsx Added new component for managing civil claimant advocates with relevant props and state management.
`apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/SelectDefender.tsx Updated import for strings module from defender to Advocates.strings; label formatting change.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Defender/Defender.strings.ts Deleted file containing internationalized messages for the defender section.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • oddsson: Suggested for review based on expertise in the relevant components and changes.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 32 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.91%. Comparing base (1482e07) to head (3fd81cc).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ictments/Advocates/SelectCivilClaimantAdvocate.tsx 0.00% 24 Missing ⚠️
...c/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.tsx 0.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
.../app/modules/defendant/civilClaimant.controller.ts 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...s/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.strings.ts 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16171      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.91%   36.91%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        6781     6782       +1     
  Lines      140053   140082      +29     
  Branches    39834    39849      +15     
==========================================
  Hits        51705    51705              
- Misses      88348    88377      +29     
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.37% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-auth-admin 48.77% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-communications 39.92% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 41.63% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules 24.40% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
cms 0.43% <ø> (ø)
cms-translations 39.04% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-api 18.30% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-backend 55.24% <0.00%> (ø)
judicial-system-web 28.04% <0.00%> (-0.06%) ⬇️
services-user-notification 47.07% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️
web 1.83% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...tes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/SelectDefender.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
.../app/modules/defendant/civilClaimant.controller.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...s/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.strings.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...c/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ictments/Advocates/SelectCivilClaimantAdvocate.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1482e07...3fd81cc. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs 64c0008 🔗

5 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 5 Passed
🔻 Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 decreased (-0.05%), 8 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 2.83s 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 120 2 3m 40.27s 1 no change Link
application-ui-shell 0 0 0 74 0 35.34s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-backend 0 0 0 21274 0 18m 42.8s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-web 0 0 0 338 0 1m 16.39s 1 decreased (-0.05%) Link

🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)

  • judicial-system-web - jest 32.3% (-0.05%) - Details

@unakb unakb marked this pull request as ready for review September 26, 2024 15:18
@unakb unakb requested a review from a team as a code owner September 26, 2024 15:18
Copy link
Member

@oddsson oddsson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, just one key issue.

@unakb unakb added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Oct 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/SelectDefender.tsx (2)

19-19: Approved: Import statement updated for better organization.

The change from import { defender as m } from './Defender.strings' to import { strings } from './Advocates.strings' improves the organization of the strings and aligns with the PR objectives. This change maintains clear and organized imports, which is a NextJS best practice.

Consider adding a comment above the import statement to explain the purpose of these strings, enhancing code readability. For example:

// Import localized strings for advocate-related UI elements
import { strings } from './Advocates.strings'

Line range hint 1-110: Overall: File adheres to NextJS and TypeScript best practices.

The changes in this file are minimal and focused, aligning well with the PR objectives. The SelectDefender component maintains good TypeScript usage for type safety and follows NextJS best practices in its structure. The modifications to string imports and usage are implemented correctly without introducing any issues related to state management or server-side rendering.

To further improve the component's reusability and maintainability, consider:

  1. Extracting the toggleDefendantWaivesRightToCounsel function to a custom hook or utility function if it's used in multiple components.
  2. Using React.memo() to optimize performance if this component is rendered frequently with the same props.

Example of using React.memo():

import React from 'react'

const SelectDefender: FC<Props> = React.memo(({ defendant }) => {
  // ... component logic ...
})

export default SelectDefender

These suggestions can enhance the overall architecture of your application, making it more scalable and easier to maintain.

apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/SelectCivilClaimantAdvocate.tsx (2)

29-29: Consider omitting the use of FC from the component type declaration.

Using FC<Props> is optional and may introduce the children prop unnecessarily. You can define the component without FC for simplicity.

Apply this diff:

-const SelectCivilClaimantAdvocate: FC<Props> = ({ civilClaimant }) => {
+const SelectCivilClaimantAdvocate = ({ civilClaimant }: Props) => {

1-162: Organize component files according to NextJS best practices.

According to NextJS conventions, component files are typically placed in a components directory rather than within the routes or pages directories. This helps keep the project structure clear and maintainable.

Consider moving SelectCivilClaimantAdvocate.tsx to a components directory.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60a4187 and a4d7153.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/defendant/civilClaimant.controller.ts (3 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/pages/domur/akaera/malflytjendur/[id].ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.strings.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.tsx (4 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/SelectCivilClaimantAdvocate.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/SelectDefender.tsx (2 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Defender/Defender.strings.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Defender/Defender.strings.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/pages/domur/akaera/malflytjendur/[id].ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/defendant/civilClaimant.controller.ts (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.strings.ts (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/SelectCivilClaimantAdvocate.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/SelectDefender.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (22)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/defendant/civilClaimant.controller.ts (3)

22-28: LGTM: New role guards imported correctly

The new role guards (districtCourtAssistantRule, districtCourtJudgeRule, and districtCourtRegistrarRule) have been imported correctly. These additions align with the PR objectives to allow judges to edit and manage civil claimant advocate information.


45-51: LGTM: Role guards expanded for create method

The @RolesRules decorator for the create method has been updated to include districtCourtJudgeRule, districtCourtRegistrarRule, and districtCourtAssistantRule. This change aligns with the PR objectives to allow judges to edit and manage civil claimant advocate information.

However, as this expands access to sensitive operations:

Please ensure that a security review has been conducted to validate the appropriateness of these new access levels. Consider running the following script to check for any security-related comments or TODOs:

✅ Verification successful

Verification Complete: No Security-Related Comments Found

The executed script did not find any security-related comments such as TODOs or FIXMEs in the codebase. This indicates that there are no known security concerns related to the recent changes.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for security-related comments in the codebase

# Test: Search for security-related comments
rg --type typescript -i "TODO.*security|FIXME.*security|security.*review"

Length of output: 1995


67-73: LGTM: Role guards expanded for update method

The @RolesRules decorator for the update method has been updated consistently with the create method, including districtCourtJudgeRule, districtCourtRegistrarRule, and districtCourtAssistantRule. This change aligns with the PR objectives and maintains consistency within the controller.

To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script to check if similar controllers have been updated with the same role guards:

If inconsistencies are found, consider updating other relevant controllers or documenting the reason for the difference.

✅ Verification successful

Verified: Role guards properly assigned per controller functionality

The @RolesRules decorators across different controllers use role guards tailored to each controller's specific responsibilities. The addition of districtCourtJudgeRule, districtCourtRegistrarRule, and districtCourtAssistantRule in the update method of civilClaimant.controller.ts aligns with its intended access requirements. No inconsistencies were found that would necessitate changes to other controllers.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency in role guards across similar controllers

# Test: Search for other controllers with RolesRules decorators
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern '@RolesRules($_)'

Length of output: 1995

apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/SelectDefender.tsx (1)

83-85: Approved: String usage updated correctly.

The change from m.defendantWaivesRightToCounsel to strings.defendantWaivesRightToCounsel correctly reflects the updated import statement. This modification maintains the existing functionality while adapting to the new import structure, adhering to TypeScript best practices.

To ensure this change is consistent throughout the file, please run the following command:

If this command returns no results, it confirms that all instances have been updated correctly.

apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.strings.ts (3)

1-3: LGTM: Import and structure are correct

The import statement and overall structure of the file adhere to best practices for internationalization using react-intl. The use of defineMessages is appropriate for defining localized messages.


4-76: LGTM: Message definitions are well-structured and complete

The message definitions follow a consistent and appropriate structure:

  • Each message has a unique id following a consistent naming convention.
  • The defaultMessage is provided in Icelandic, which is suitable for the project context.
  • The description field offers valuable context for translators.

This approach ensures clear and maintainable internationalization.


1-77: Overall: Well-implemented internationalization with room for minor enhancement

This file demonstrates a strong implementation of internationalization using react-intl:

  • Consistent and clear message structure
  • Appropriate use of Icelandic for default messages
  • Helpful descriptions for translators

The suggested type safety improvement would further enhance the code quality, but the current implementation is already solid and meets the requirements for the advocates section of the court indictments module.

apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.tsx (10)

23-25: Imports are correctly added

The new imports for SelectCivilClaimantAdvocate and strings are appropriately added to support the new functionality related to civil claimant advocates.


27-27: Component renamed to 'Advocates'

Renaming the component to Advocates aligns with its updated focus on managing advocates, improving code readability and clarity.


43-43: Properly checking for civil claimants

The hasCivilClaimants variable correctly determines the presence of civil claimants, ensuring that the UI updates accordingly.


55-55: PageTitle utilizes the correct string resource

The PageTitle component correctly references strings.title, ensuring consistent messaging in the application.


59-59: AlertMessage displays the appropriate message

The AlertMessage component uses strings.alertBannerText for its message, providing users with relevant information.


63-63: Dynamic margin adjustment enhances layout

Adjusting the marginBottom based on hasCivilClaimants improves the layout by ensuring appropriate spacing whether civil claimants are present or not.


65-65: SectionHeading for defenders includes 'required' prop

Including the required prop in the SectionHeading for defenders emphasizes the necessity of this information.


72-81: Conditional rendering of civil claimant advocates

The component correctly conditionally renders the civil claimants' advocates section when applicable, enhancing functionality as per the PR objectives.


76-76: Proper use of 'key' prop in list rendering

Adding the key prop with civilClaimant.id to the Box component ensures unique keys for each item, addressing any potential React key warnings.


100-100: Export default updated to 'Advocates'

Exporting the component as Advocates aligns with the component's new name, maintaining consistency across the codebase.

apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/SelectCivilClaimantAdvocate.tsx (5)

78-81: Avoid unnecessary type assertions with 'as UpdateCivilClaimantInput'.

Similar to the previous comment, you can remove the type assertion here as well.


111-114: Avoid unnecessary type assertions with 'as UpdateCivilClaimantInput'.

Again, consider removing the unnecessary type assertion for clarity.


140-148: Avoid unnecessary type assertions with 'as UpdateCivilClaimantInput'.

This instance also contains an unnecessary type assertion that can be safely removed.


107-109: Simplify the 'disabled' condition for better readability.

Same as the previous comment, you can simplify this condition as well.


88-92: Verify the correctness of 'advocateType' values.

Ensure that the values 'defender' and 'legal_rights_protector' provided to the advocateType prop match the expected values in the InputAdvocate component. This helps prevent runtime errors due to mismatched strings.

If these strings are used in multiple places, consider defining them as constants or an enumeration for consistency and type safety.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/defendant/civilClaimant.controller.ts (3)

45-51: LGTM: Role rules updated for create method

The @RolesRules decorator has been correctly updated to include the new district court roles (judge, registrar, and assistant). This change aligns with the PR objective of allowing judges to input civil claimant advocate information.

Consider updating the API documentation or comments to reflect these new role permissions.


67-73: LGTM: Role rules updated for update method

The @RolesRules decorator has been correctly updated to include the new district court roles (judge, registrar, and assistant) for the update method. This change aligns with the PR objective of allowing judges to edit civil claimant advocate information.

Consider updating the API documentation or comments to reflect these new role permissions.


Line range hint 1-112: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectives

The modifications to the CivilClaimantController successfully implement the PR objective of allowing judges to input and edit civil claimant advocate information. The addition of district court roles (judge, registrar, and assistant) to the create and update methods enhances the court's ability to manage civil claimant information efficiently.

The code changes adhere to TypeScript and NextJS best practices, maintaining good structure and type safety. The role-based access control has been appropriately expanded, improving the authorization logic of the system.

To further improve the system:

  1. Ensure that the API documentation is updated to reflect the new role permissions.
  2. Consider implementing a more flexible role-based access control system that allows for easier management of permissions across different methods and controllers.
  3. Evaluate the need for additional unit tests to cover the new role permissions and ensure the system behaves correctly for all authorized roles.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/SelectDefender.tsx (2)

19-19: Approved: Import statement updated for better clarity.

The change from import { defender as m } from './Defender.strings' to import { strings } from './Advocates.strings' improves clarity and aligns better with the component's purpose. This update simplifies the usage of imported strings throughout the component.

Consider using a more descriptive name for the imported object, such as advocateStrings, to make it immediately clear what type of strings are being imported:

import { strings as advocateStrings } from './Advocates.strings'

Line range hint 1-112: Suggestions for improved type safety and readability.

The component generally follows React best practices and uses hooks effectively. However, there are a few areas where we can improve type safety and readability:

  1. Add explicit return type for the component:
const SelectDefender: FC<Props> = ({ defendant }): JSX.Element => {
  1. Simplify the ternary operations in updateDefendantInput:
const updateDefendantInput = {
  caseId,
  defendantId: defendant.id,
  defenderNationalId: defendantWaivesRightToCounsel ? '' : defendant.defenderNationalId,
  defenderName: defendantWaivesRightToCounsel ? '' : defendant.defenderName,
  defenderEmail: defendantWaivesRightToCounsel ? '' : defendant.defenderEmail,
  defenderPhoneNumber: defendantWaivesRightToCounsel ? '' : defendant.defenderPhoneNumber,
  defenderChoice: defendantWaivesRightToCounsel ? DefenderChoice.WAIVE : undefined,
};
  1. Consider using a custom type for the gender variable to improve type safety:
type Gender = 'MALE' | 'FEMALE' | 'NONE';
const gender: Gender = defendant.gender as Gender || 'NONE';
  1. Add a type for the event parameter in the Checkbox onChange handler:
onChange={(event: React.ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => {
  // ...
}}

These changes will enhance the overall type safety and readability of the component.

Would you like me to provide a more detailed refactoring suggestion for any specific part of the component?

apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.strings.ts (5)

3-77: LGTM: Well-structured internationalization constant.

The strings constant is well-organized and follows react-intl best practices. Good job on providing descriptive id fields and helpful description fields for translators.

Suggestions for further improvement:

  1. Consider adding a prefix to the id fields to ensure global uniqueness across the entire application, e.g., judicial.system.court.indictments.advocates.title.
  2. For messages with variables (like defendantWaivesRightToCounsel and shareFilesWithCivilClaimantAdvocate), consider adding comments in the description field explaining the expected values for these variables.

22-27: Enhance description for defendantWaivesRightToCounsel message.

The message structure and content are good. However, the description field could be more informative about the {accused} variable.

Consider updating the description to something like:

description:
  'Used as button text when the accused does not wish to have a defender appointed in the judge flow for indictments. The {accused} variable will be replaced with the name or identifier of the accused.',

This provides clearer context for translators about the variable usage.


34-39: Enhance description for shareFilesWithCivilClaimantAdvocate message.

The message structure and content are well-implemented, especially the use of ICU MessageFormat. However, the description field could be more informative about the defenderIsLawyer variable.

Consider updating the description to something like:

description: 'Used as text on a button for sharing claims with a claimant\'s advocate. The {defenderIsLawyer} variable is a boolean that determines whether to use "lögmanni" (lawyer) or "réttargæslumanni" (legal rights protector) in the message.',

This provides clearer context for translators about the variable usage and its impact on the message.


40-46: Enhance description for shareFilesWithCivilClaimantAdvocateTooltip message.

The message structure and content are well-implemented, especially the use of ICU MessageFormat. However, the description field could be more informative about the defenderIsLawyer variable.

Consider updating the description to something like:

description: 'Used as tooltip text for the share claims button. The {defenderIsLawyer} variable is a boolean that determines whether to use "lögmaður" (lawyer) or "réttargæslumaður" (legal rights protector) in the message.',

This provides clearer context for translators about the variable usage and its impact on the message.


58-64: Enhance description for removeCivilClaimantAdvocate message.

The message structure and content are well-implemented, especially the use of ICU MessageFormat. However, the description field could be more informative about the defenderIsLawyer variable.

Consider updating the description to something like:

description: 'Used as text for removing a claimant\'s advocate in the judge flow for indictments. The {defenderIsLawyer} variable is a boolean that determines whether to use "lögmann" (lawyer) or "réttargæslumann" (legal rights protector) in the message.',

This provides clearer context for translators about the variable usage and its impact on the message.

apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.tsx (1)

27-27: Specify the component's return type for better type safety.

Consider adding an explicit return type to the Advocates component to enhance type safety and code readability.

Apply this change:

-const Advocates = () => {
+const Advocates: React.FC = () => {
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/SelectCivilClaimantAdvocate.tsx (1)

94-96: Simplify null and undefined checks

You can simplify the null and undefined checks by using civilClaimant.spokespersonIsLawyer == null. This checks for both null and undefined values, reducing code verbosity.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60a4187 and a4d7153.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/defendant/civilClaimant.controller.ts (3 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/pages/domur/akaera/malflytjendur/[id].ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.strings.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.tsx (4 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/SelectCivilClaimantAdvocate.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/SelectDefender.tsx (2 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Defender/Defender.strings.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Defender/Defender.strings.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/pages/domur/akaera/malflytjendur/[id].ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/defendant/civilClaimant.controller.ts (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.strings.ts (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/SelectCivilClaimantAdvocate.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/SelectDefender.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (11)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/defendant/civilClaimant.controller.ts (2)

22-28: LGTM: Import changes align with PR objectives

The new imports for district court roles (judge, registrar, and assistant) are correctly added and organized. This change aligns with the PR objective of allowing judges to manage civil claimant advocate information.


Line range hint 92-93: Verify: Intentional exclusion of new roles from delete method

The delete method's @RolesRules decorator hasn't been updated to include the new district court roles. Please confirm if this is intentional, as it differs from the create and update methods.

If this is intentional, consider adding a comment explaining why these roles are excluded from the delete operation. If not, update the roles to match the other methods.

apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/SelectDefender.tsx (2)

Line range hint 1-112: Overall assessment: Component is well-structured with minor improvements suggested.

The SelectDefender component is well-implemented, following React best practices and effectively using hooks and context. The changes made to string imports improve clarity and maintainability. The component's logic for handling defender selection and waiving the right to counsel is sound.

To further enhance the component:

  1. Consider implementing the suggested type safety improvements.
  2. Evaluate the proposed simplification of ternary operations for better readability.
  3. Ensure that the Advocates.strings file contains all necessary string constants.

These minor adjustments will contribute to a more robust and maintainable codebase.


83-86: Approved: Consistent usage of imported strings.

The change from m.defendantWaivesRightToCounsel to strings.defendantWaivesRightToCounsel is consistent with the updated import statement. The string is correctly formatted using the formatMessage function, and it includes a dynamic value for the 'accused' parameter, which is good for localization.

To ensure that the string key is correct and exists in the Advocates.strings file, please run the following command:

✅ Verification successful

Verified: String key exists in Advocates.strings.ts.

The defendantWaivesRightToCounsel key exists in Advocates.strings.ts as confirmed by the grep command. The usage in SelectDefender.tsx is correct and consistent.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence of the 'defendantWaivesRightToCounsel' key in Advocates.strings
grep -n 'defendantWaivesRightToCounsel' apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.strings.ts

Length of output: 162

apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.strings.ts (2)

1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.

The import of defineMessages from 'react-intl' is appropriate for internationalization purposes.


1-77: Overall: Well-structured and implemented internationalization file.

This file adheres to NextJS and TypeScript best practices for internationalization:

  1. Proper use of react-intl library and defineMessages function.
  2. Consistent naming conventions for message IDs.
  3. Descriptive defaultMessage and description fields for each message.
  4. Effective use of ICU MessageFormat for handling dynamic content.

The structure promotes maintainability and ease of translation. Minor improvements to some description fields have been suggested to provide more context for translators.

Great job on implementing a robust internationalization setup for the advocates section of the court indictments module!

apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.tsx (5)

23-23: New imports are correctly added.

The imports for SelectCivilClaimantAdvocate and { strings } from ./Advocates.strings are appropriately included to support the updated functionality.

Also applies to: 25-25


43-43: Proper calculation of hasCivilClaimants.

The use of optional chaining and nullish coalescing ensures that hasCivilClaimants accurately reflects the presence of civil claimants in workingCase.


55-55: Appropriate use of localized strings.

The component correctly utilizes formatMessage with the strings resource for localization, enhancing internationalization support.

Also applies to: 59-59


63-63: Conditional margin enhances layout responsiveness.

Adjusting marginBottom based on hasCivilClaimants ensures consistent spacing and improves the UI layout dynamically.


72-81: Conditional rendering of civil claimants is correctly implemented.

The code effectively checks hasCivilClaimants and maps over workingCase.civilClaimants to render each advocate. The key prop is appropriately set to civilClaimant.id on the Box component to prevent unique key warnings.

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit fa8f276 into main Oct 4, 2024
60 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the j-s/civil-claimant-courts branch October 4, 2024 17:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants