Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(transfer-of-vehicle-ownership): removing age validation of operators #16092

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 19, 2024

Conversation

berglindoma13
Copy link
Member

@berglindoma13 berglindoma13 commented Sep 19, 2024

...

Attach a link to issue if relevant

What

Specify what you're trying to achieve

Why

Specify why you need to achieve this

Screenshots / Gifs

Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new age validation feature that differentiates requirements based on user type (co-owner or operator).
    • Added an optional needsAgeValidation property to enhance flexibility in age validation for national ID inputs.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved validation logic to ensure age checks are only enforced when necessary, based on the new property.

@berglindoma13 berglindoma13 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 19, 2024 15:06
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@berglindoma13 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 54 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a8eaeef and a4e5484.

Walkthrough

The changes introduced in this pull request focus on implementing a new needsAgeValidation property across various components related to vehicle ownership transfer. This property determines whether age validation is necessary based on user type, specifically distinguishing between operators and co-owners. The updates involve modifications to state initialization, prop interfaces, and validation logic, enhancing the overall functionality of the components by allowing for conditional age validation.

Changes

File Change Summary
libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/fields/CoOwnerAndOperatorRepeater/CoOwnerAndOperatorRepeaterItem.tsx Added needsAgeValidation field derived from userMessageId, affecting state initialization and passed to NationalIdWithName component.
libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/fields/CoOwnerAndOperatorRepeater/index.tsx Introduced needsAgeValidation property in state initialization, conditionally set based on type.
libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/fields/NationalIdWithName/index.tsx Added optional needsAgeValidation prop to Props interface, modifying age validation logic based on this property.
libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/fields/ReviewCoOwnerAndOperatorRepeater/ReviewCoOwnerAndOperatorRepeaterItem.tsx Added needsAgeValidation property to the component's data structure to track age validation necessity.
libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/lib/dataSchema.ts Introduced needsAgeValidation property to RemovableUserSchemaBase, altering validation logic to conditionally enforce age checks based on this property.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

automerge, high priority

Suggested reviewers

  • thorkellmani
  • sigruntg
  • Toti91
  • disaerna

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.66%. Comparing base (e9ebcaf) to head (a4e5484).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ransfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/lib/dataSchema.ts 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...y/change-operator-of-vehicle/src/lib/dataSchema.ts 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #16092   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   36.66%   36.66%           
=======================================
  Files        6748     6748           
  Lines      138733   138729    -4     
  Branches    39407    39403    -4     
=======================================
  Hits        50862    50862           
+ Misses      87871    87867    -4     
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.39% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-auth-admin 49.89% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-communications 39.98% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 41.51% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
application-template-api-modules 23.45% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
application-ui-shell 21.29% <ø> (ø)
cms 0.43% <ø> (ø)
cms-translations 39.12% <ø> (ø)
content-search-toolkit 8.50% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-api 18.61% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-backend 54.71% <ø> (ø)
services-user-notification 47.16% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...y/change-operator-of-vehicle/src/lib/dataSchema.ts 25.00% <0.00%> (+2.27%) ⬆️
...ransfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/lib/dataSchema.ts 20.93% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e9ebcaf...a4e5484. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/fields/CoOwnerAndOperatorRepeater/index.tsx (1)

105-105: Simplify the conditional assignment.

The ternary operator used to assign the needsAgeValidation property based on the type value is unnecessary and can be simplified for better readability.

Apply this diff to simplify the code:

-needsAgeValidation: type === 'operator' ? false : true,
+needsAgeValidation: type !== 'operator',

This directly assigns the negated result of the equality check, eliminating the need for the ternary operator.

Tools
Biome

[error] 105-105: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.

Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with

(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e9ebcaf and a8eaeef.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/fields/CoOwnerAndOperatorRepeater/CoOwnerAndOperatorRepeaterItem.tsx (3 hunks)
  • libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/fields/CoOwnerAndOperatorRepeater/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/fields/NationalIdWithName/index.tsx (4 hunks)
  • libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/fields/ReviewCoOwnerAndOperatorRepeater/ReviewCoOwnerAndOperatorRepeaterItem.tsx (1 hunks)
  • libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (5)
libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/fields/CoOwnerAndOperatorRepeater/CoOwnerAndOperatorRepeaterItem.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/fields/CoOwnerAndOperatorRepeater/index.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/fields/NationalIdWithName/index.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/fields/ReviewCoOwnerAndOperatorRepeater/ReviewCoOwnerAndOperatorRepeaterItem.tsx (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Biome
libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/fields/CoOwnerAndOperatorRepeater/CoOwnerAndOperatorRepeaterItem.tsx

[error] 56-56: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.

Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with

(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)


[error] 78-78: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.

Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with

(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)

libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/fields/CoOwnerAndOperatorRepeater/index.tsx

[error] 105-105: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.

Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with

(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)

Additional comments not posted (7)
libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (2)

29-29: LGTM!

The new optional boolean property needsAgeValidation is a clear and appropriate addition to the RemovableUserSchemaBase schema. It allows for more flexible age validation scenarios without breaking existing code.


32-39: Verify the impact of the conditional age validation.

The changes to the refine method correctly implement the conditional age validation based on the needsAgeValidation property. This enhances the schema's functionality by allowing more flexible validation scenarios.

However, it's important to verify that this change aligns with the business requirements and doesn't introduce unintended side effects in the existing codebase.

Please run the following script to analyze the impact of this change:

Verification successful

Conditional age validation is correctly implemented and localized.

The changes to the RemovableUserSchemaBase schema in the transfer-of-vehicle-ownership template are correctly implemented and localized. The conditional age validation based on the needsAgeValidation property is specific to this template and does not affect other templates using the RemovableUserSchemaBase schema.

However, to ensure the change functions as intended:

  • Thoroughly test the transfer-of-vehicle-ownership template with various scenarios, including cases where needsAgeValidation is true and false.
  • Verify that the age validation behaves correctly in both cases.
  • Confirm that other templates using RemovableUserSchemaBase continue to function as expected without being affected by this change.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of the conditional age validation change.

# Test 1: Search for usages of the `RemovableUserSchemaBase` schema.
# Expect: Review the usage to ensure the conditional age validation is handled correctly.
rg --type typescript -A 5 $'RemovableUserSchemaBase'

# Test 2: Search for potential side effects related to the `nationalId` and age validation.
# Expect: No unintended side effects or inconsistencies in the validation logic.
rg --type typescript -A 5 $'nationalId.+age'

Length of output: 165


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of the conditional age validation change.

# Test 1: Search for usages of the RemovableUserSchemaBase schema.
echo "Searching for RemovableUserSchemaBase usage:"
fd -e ts -e tsx | xargs grep -n -A 5 "RemovableUserSchemaBase"

# Test 2: Search for potential side effects related to the nationalId and age validation.
echo "Searching for nationalId and age validation patterns:"
fd -e ts -e tsx | xargs grep -n -A 5 "nationalId.*age"

Length of output: 74911

libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/fields/CoOwnerAndOperatorRepeater/CoOwnerAndOperatorRepeaterItem.tsx (1)

47-47: LGTM!

The new constant needsAgeValidation is declared correctly using the fieldIndex variable. The naming is clear and follows the existing conventions.

libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/fields/NationalIdWithName/index.tsx (3)

19-19: LGTM!

The new optional prop needsAgeValidation is well-defined and the default value ensures backward compatibility.


34-34: LGTM!

The destructuring assignment correctly sets the default value for needsAgeValidation.


67-67: LGTM!

The age validation logic is correctly modified to conditionally check the age based on the needsAgeValidation prop. This enhances the component's flexibility by allowing consumers to opt-out of age validation when needed.

libs/application/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/src/fields/ReviewCoOwnerAndOperatorRepeater/ReviewCoOwnerAndOperatorRepeaterItem.tsx (1)

72-72: Verify the impact on age validation logic.

The addition of the needsAgeValidation property aligns with the PR objective of removing the age validation requirement for operators. This change suggests that the age validation logic will be conditionally applied based on the value of needsAgeValidation.

Please verify that the age validation logic has been updated accordingly in other parts of the codebase to honor the needsAgeValidation flag for operators.

Verification successful

Age validation requirement successfully removed for operators

The codebase changes confirm that the age validation requirement has been removed for operators in the transfer of vehicle ownership process. Key evidence includes:

  1. In the CoOwnerAndOperatorRepeater component, needsAgeValidation is set to false for operators and true for co-owners.
  2. The dataSchema.ts file contains logic that conditionally applies age validation based on the needsAgeValidation flag.
  3. The ReviewCoOwnerAndOperatorRepeaterItem component passes the needsAgeValidation flag from the repeaterField, ensuring consistency throughout the form.

These changes effectively implement the removal of age validation for operators while maintaining it for co-owners, aligning with the PR objective.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the age validation logic has been updated to honor the `needsAgeValidation` flag for operators.

# Test 1: Search for the usage of `needsAgeValidation` in the codebase. 
# Expect: The flag should be used to conditionally apply age validation for operators.
rg --type typescript $'needsAgeValidation'

# Test 2: Search for the age validation logic in the codebase.
# Expect: The logic should check the `needsAgeValidation` flag before validating age for operators.
rg --type typescript $'ageValidation|validateAge'

Length of output: 162


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of needsAgeValidation and age validation logic in the codebase

# Search for needsAgeValidation in .ts and .tsx files
echo "Searching for needsAgeValidation:"
rg 'needsAgeValidation' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx'

# Search for age validation related terms in .ts and .tsx files
echo "Searching for age validation logic:"
rg 'ageValidation|validateAge|age.*validation' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx'

# Search for operator-related age checks
echo "Searching for operator-related age checks:"
rg 'operator.*age|age.*operator' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx'

Length of output: 27547

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

Datadog Report

All test runs 06c401d 🔗

12 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 11 Passed
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 32 no change

Test Services
This report shows up to 10 services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 3.12s 1 no change Link
api-domains-auth-admin 0 0 0 18 0 13.68s 1 no change Link
api-domains-communications 0 0 0 5 0 33.41s 1 no change Link
api-domains-license-service 0 0 0 0 0 549.49ms 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 111 2 3m 40.91s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 109 0 1m 51.65s 1 no change Link
application-ui-shell 0 0 0 74 0 34.48s 1 no change Link
cms-translations 0 0 0 3 0 29.08s 1 no change Link
content-search-toolkit 0 0 0 4 0 11.47s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-api 0 0 0 57 0 6.23s 1 no change Link

@berglindoma13 berglindoma13 added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Sep 19, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit cab33e1 into main Sep 19, 2024
68 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the fix/eigendaskipti-validation-fix branch September 19, 2024 15:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants